P.B. Singh Vs. the Director General

P.B. Singh vs The Director General

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 19, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1030641

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1030641
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jun 19, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.B. Singh

Advocate Shri. K.P. Singh

Respondent

The Director General

Excerpt

w.p.no.8348/2012 19.06.2012 shri k.p. singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. heard on the question of admission. it is contended that in similar circumstances, in other writ petitions this court has granted interim relief while entertaining the writ petition. it is contended that since the petitioner has not been allotted any quarter at mumbai at present, it will not be possible for the petitioner to vacate the quarter at bhopal to shift his family to mumbai where he has been posted. considering the aforesaid, issue notice of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven days by registered a.d. the notices be made returnable in four weeks. till next consideration of interim prayer, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner for eviction of his family from the quarter in dispute at bhopal. list along with w.p.no.14094/2011 and w.p.no.3603/2010 immediately after four weeks. certified copy as per rules. (k.k.trivedi) judge. a.praj.

Full Judgment

W.P.No.8348/2012 19.06.2012 Shri K.P.

Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Heard on the question of admission.

It is contended that in similar circumstances, in other writ petitions this Court has granted interim relief while entertaining the writ petition.

It is contended that since the petitioner has not been allotted any quarter at Mumbai at present, it will not be possible for the petitioner to vacate the quarter at Bhopal to shift his family to Mumbai where he has been posted.

Considering the aforesaid, issue notice of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of Process Fee within seven days by registered A.D.

The notices be made returnable in four weeks.

Till next consideration of interim prayer, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner for eviction of his family from the quarter in dispute at Bhopal.

List along with W.P.No.14094/2011 and W.P.No.3603/2010 immediately after four weeks.

Certified copy as per rules.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge.

A.Praj.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties P.B. Singh vs The Director General Same Subject Education