Madhya Pradesh Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nirapad Vishwas Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2012
1 W.P.No.10026 o02. 11.2012 Shri K.K.Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, PL for respondents No.1 to 3. He is heard on the question of admission. Without challenging any specific order, the petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the authorities of the respondents No.1 to 3 to issue him the Patta with respect of the disputed land by holding him to be the displaced person. Such prayer is made by the petitioner on the basis of the circular dated 20.12.99 Annex.P/2 promulgated and circulated by the Rehabilitation Department of Madhya Pradesh. Besides this, such prayer is also made on the basis of the provision of The Madhya Pradesh Nagariya Kshetro Ke Bhoomihin Vyakti (Pattadhriti Adhikaron Ka Pradan Kiya Jana) Adhiniyam,1984. Petitioner's counsel instead to make any submission on merits of the matter has made his limited submission for issuing the appropriate ...
Ganesh Prasad Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2012
1 W.P.No.18510/2011 (S) Ganesh Prasad Tiwari versus State of M.P.& Ors 01.12.2011 Heard Shri Mahendra Patariya, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 30.7.2010 issued by the respondent no.2 as well as the order dated 7.9.2011 by which a charge sheet has been issued to the petitioner by the respondent no.4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner on account of a direction issued by the Human Rights Commission which is not permissible in law. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the documents filed by the petitioner specifically the charge sheet issued to him on 7.9.2011, it is clear that the charges levelled against the petitioner relate to 2 W.P.No.18510/2011 (S) Ganesh Prasad Tiwari versus State of M.P.& Ors acceptance of bribe from c...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›