Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nirapad Vishwas Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Nirapad Vishwas vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 02, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046583

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nirapad Vishwas

Advocate Shri. K.K.Pandey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.10026 o”02. 11.2012 shri k.k.pandey, counsel for the petitioner. shri amit kumar sharma, pl for respondents no.1 to 3. he is heard on the question of admission. without challenging any specific order, the petitioner has filed this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuing appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the authorities of the respondents no.1 to 3 to issue him the patta with respect of the disputed land by holding him to be the displaced person. such prayer is made by the petitioner on the basis of the circular dated 20.12.99 annex.p/2 promulgated and circulated by the rehabilitation department of madhya pradesh. besides this, such prayer is also made on the basis of the provision of the madhya pradesh nagariya kshetro ke bhoomihin vyakti (pattadhriti adhikaron ka pradan kiya jana) adhiniyam,1984. petitioner's counsel instead to make any submission on merits of the matter has made his limited submission for issuing the appropriate direction to the respondent no.2 collector to consider and decide his pending representation annex.p/1 in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the law on some early date with time bound schedule. the state counsel did not have any objection in disposing of this petition on the aforesaid limited prayer. in view of the aforesaid, instead to admit or issue any notice to the other side, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 collector to decide the aforesaid representation annex.p/1 in accordance with the prescribed procedure of law by speaking order within 90 days from the date of filing the certified copy of this order along with the copy of the petition with annexures in his office by the petitioner. petitioner's counsel is directed to submit such papers in the office of the collector within 15 days from today. c.c as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge mkl

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.10026 o”

02. 11.2012 Shri K.K.Pandey, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, PL for respondents No.1 to 3.

He is heard on the question of admission.

Without challenging any specific order, the petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the authorities of the respondents No.1 to 3 to issue him the Patta with respect of the disputed land by holding him to be the displaced person.

Such prayer is made by the petitioner on the basis of the circular dated 20.12.99 Annex.P/2 promulgated and circulated by the Rehabilitation Department of Madhya Pradesh.

Besides this, such prayer is also made on the basis of the provision of The Madhya Pradesh Nagariya Kshetro Ke Bhoomihin Vyakti (Pattadhriti Adhikaron Ka Pradan Kiya Jana) Adhiniyam,1984.

Petitioner's counsel instead to make any submission on merits of the matter has made his limited submission for issuing the appropriate direction to the respondent No.2 Collector to consider and decide his pending representation Annex.P/1 in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the law on some early date with time bound schedule.

The State counsel did not have any objection in disposing of this petition on the aforesaid limited prayer.

In view of the aforesaid, instead to admit or issue any notice to the other side, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 Collector to decide the aforesaid representation Annex.P/1 in accordance with the prescribed procedure of law by speaking order within 90 days from the date of filing the certified copy of this order along with the copy of the petition with annexures in his office by the petitioner.

Petitioner's counsel is directed to submit such papers in the office of the Collector within 15 days from today.

C.C as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge MKL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial