Madhya Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramchandra Mourya Vs. Awadesh Ozha
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
W.P.No.13528 o08. 11.2012 Shri Ashok Lalwani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 7. At his request the case is taken out of its turn from the list of not reached cases. The petitioner's counsel submits that it is already 4.30 PM and, therefore, hearing of this petition on such count and also in the absence of the counsel of private respondents is not possible. In continuation, he submits that due to some personal reason he is not available tomorrow and prayed to adjourn the matter by fixing a date under the discretion of this court. Let this matter be listed in the week commencing 26.11.2012, as prayed. Shri Lalwani is also directed to inform in this regard to the counsel of private respondents. ( U.C.Maheshwari ) Judge bks...
Balram Dixit Vs. Santan Singh Lodhi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
(1) M.A. No.4647/2011 HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava Misc. Appeal No.4647 / 2011 Appellant : Balram Dixit, S/o. Tikaram Dixit, R/o. Village Plaintiff Shri Rajendra Gupta, Advocate for appellants. Versus Respondents :1. Santan Singh Lodhi Defendants S/o. Sadhuram Lodhi, R/o. Village Murachh, P.O. Dhamna Tehsil & District Narsinghpur.2. Smt. Ashabai Naroliya W/o. Rajkishore Naroliya, R/o. Sanjay Ward, Narsinghpur, Tehsil and District Narsinghpur 3. State of Madhya Pradesh through Collector Narsinghpur. ________________________________________________________ Shri G.S. Baghel and Shri B.S. Sahu, Advocates for appellant. Shri Saurabh Bhusan Shrivastava, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2. Shri Ashok Chourasiya, Government Advocate for respondent no.3/State. ________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Delivered on this 8th day of November, 2012) (2) M.A. No.4647/2011 This appeal has been preferred under...
Dr.R.K.Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
1 W.P.No.15427/2012 8/11/2012 Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for the respondents. From the record it is seen that petitioner's case for promotion was not being considered because in the communication made to the Departmental Promotion Committee, petitioner was shown to be under suspension w.e.f.30th June, 2012. The suspension of the petitioner was however recovered as is evident from Annexure P/6 dated 7.9.2012 and if the petitioner's suspension was revoked on 7.9.2012, it is not known as to how the Departmental Promotion Committee proceeded in the matter and considering the petitioner to be under suspension, even though petitioner's case was considered for promotion in accordance to the interim order passed but on the ground that petitioner is suspended, matter is kept in a sealed cover. There is nothing on record to show that petitioner is under suspension. That being so, respondents' action for considering the case of the p...
Laxmi Swasahayata Samooh Middle School Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
W.P.No.18793/2012 Laxmi Narayan Samooh versus State of M.P.& ORS.08.11.2012 Heard Shri Ashish Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 22.10.2012 by which the work of supply of mid-day meals awarded to the petitioner for Middle School Kandela has been withdrawn and the same has been given to the Gram Panchayat Kandela. Admittedly the appeal filed by the petitioner against the aforesaid order before the Collector on 30.10.2012 is pending and the petitioner without awaiting for a decision thereon has immediately filed the present petition after two days. In such circumstances, as the petitioner cannot be permitted to prosecute two parallel proceedings at the same time and as the Collector is already ceased with the matter, therefore, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the pending matter before the Collector in a...
Swati Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
1....W.P.No.18392 of 2012 Swati Soni State of M.P.& ors 08.11.2012 Shri Atulanand Awasthy, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, G.A.for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has received an undertaking of the petitioner by Fax from Delhi that she is ready to serve in rural areas after completion of her Post Graduation, if she is admitted in the P.G.course. It is submitted that as the undertaking has been received by Fax, he may be allowed a short time to file an undertaking by the petitioner herself before this Court in this regard. In the interest of justice, the contention of the petitioner is accepted. Shri Awasthy is directed to file an undertaking of the petitioner which he has received by Fax with duly certified by him that the undertaking is of the petitioner herself. On filing such an undertaking in the Registry, petitioner the shall be permitted to participate in the counsellings conducted by the National Board Examination for the ...
Sanjeev Kumar Gokhale Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
1 W.P.No.940/2011 Sanjeev Kumar Gokhale versus S.B.I & ORS.08.11.2012 Shri N.K.Salunke learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashish Shroti learned counsel for the respondent Bank. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of the documents filed by them alongwith an application, I.A No.13425/2012, for final disposal of the petition whereby a sum of Rs.3.50 Lakhs as ex-gratia amount has been released to the petitioner by order dated 29.6.2012, the petition filed by the petitioner be disposed of. The aforesaid aspect is not opposed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the respondents, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition in case any cause of action arises or survives. C.C as per rules. ( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-...
Murlidhar Budhwani Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
W.P.No.8022 o08. 11.2012 Shri Ashok Lalwani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3. At his request the case is taken out of its turn from the list of not reached cases. The petitioner's counsel submits that it is already 4.30 PM and, therefore, hearing of this petition on such count and also in the absence of the counsel of private respondents is not possible. In continuation, he submits that due to some personal reason he is not available tomorrow and prayed to adjourn the matter by fixing a date under the discretion of this court. Let this matter be listed in the week commencing 26.11.2012, as prayed. Shri Lalwani is also directed to inform in this regard to the counsel of private respondents. ( U.C.Maheshwari ) Judge bks...
Sarvar HussaIn Vs. the General Manager
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
Sarvar Hussain versus GM, J.Cement and two otheRs.08.11.2012. Shri A.K.Gupta for the petitioner. Petitioner is working as a Heavy Vehicle Driver in the J.Cement Company Limited. Grievance of the petitioner is that his services have been terminated in an illegal manner. Respondent is a Private Limited Company. It is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution not is a statutory authority amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court. A writ petition against a Private Limited Company, which is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court, is not maintainable. Accordingly, finding the petition against the respondents a Private Limited Company, to be not maintainable, this writ petition is dismissed. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-...
Sikandar Hafiz Alias Nawab Mia Vs. Anwar Mohammad Khan
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
Writ Petition No.12588/2012 08.11.2012 Shri Naman Nagrath, learned Sr.Adv assisted by Shri H. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Service report of the notice issued to respondent No.1 is still awaited as such issued notice has not been received back either served or unserved. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Govt Adv for respondent no.2-State. In the available circumstances, on payment of fresh PF alongwith requisites of registered post within seven days, the notice as directed earlier, returnable by fixing a date in the month of January 2013 be issued to the respondent no.1, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench. Let this matter be listed alongwith W.P.No.12587/2012 on the date which is so mentioned in the aforesaid notice. Interim order passed earlier is hereby continued till next hearing. (U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks W.P No.13371 o10. 09.2012 Shri A.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.He is heard on t...
Ku. Rajani Ahirwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
Ku. Rajani Ahirwar versus State of Madhya Pradesh and otheRs.08.11.2012. Smt. Smita Arora for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance notice. Considering the fact that an appeal/representation filed by the petitioner is pending before the Chief Executive Officer as is evident from Annexure P/13, for the present without entering into the controveRs.on merits, respondent No.3 the Chief Executive Officer of Janpad Panchayat, is directed to take note of the objections of the petitioner and take steps for appointment to the post in question after considering and deciding the objections. With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »