Madhya Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dalpat Raikwar Vs. Shri D.N. Ahirwar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
Dalpat Raikwar versus Shri D.N.Ahirwar. 20.11.2012. Shri Arvind Pathak for the applicant. Smt. Gulab Patel for the non-applicant. In view of the reply filed by the non-applicant and the compliance reported as is evident from Annexure R/1 and the payment made in accordance to the cheque, available as Annexure R/2, not no further action is required to be taken in the matter. Non-applicant is discharged from the proceedings and the application disposed of. In case applicant has any grievance still subsisting with regard to the compliance report, he is granted liberty to challenge the same afresh in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty to the applicant, this application stands disposed of. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-...
G.S.Namdeo Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
1 W.P.No.4868/2003 20/11/2012 Shri S.R.Tamrakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Dy. Govt. Adv.for the respondents. The case is of a senior citizen. Petitioner is more than 70 years of age and this petition is pending since 2003. Return has not been filed till date. Taking note of all these factors on 28.9.2012 the case was directed to be listed for final hearing and it was clearly indicated that in case return is not filed matter shall be heard. Case is listed today for final hearing but return has not been filed and hearing in the matter is not possible. Even though this Court has directed that if return is not filed matter shall be heard but learned counsel for the State prays for a short adjournment to file the reply. Considering the totality of circumstances as a matter of last indulgence time upto 10.12.2012 is granted to the respondents to file reply subject to payment of cost of Rs.5000/-. The amount of Rs.5000/- shall be deposited on the next date ...
Shri Sant Singh Ji Seed Manufacturing Co-operative Society Mydt. Prabh ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
1 W.P No.3847/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3847/2012 PETITIONER : SANT SINGH J.SEED MANUFACTURING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY MARYADIT Vs. RESPONDENTS : STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the petitioner : Shri Anil Lala, Advocate. For the respondents : Shri S. S. Bisen, Govt. Advocate. Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice R.S. Jha. ORDER (20/11/2012) The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 11.7.2011 passed by the Dy. Director/Licensing Officer (Seed), Kisan Kalyan & Krishi Vikas Department, Betul and order dated 4.2.2012 passed by the appellate authority whereby the order of the competent authority cancelling the petitioner's license granted under the provisions of the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 has been affirmed.2. The brief facts, leading to the filing of the present petition, are that the petitioner is a registered co- operative society and is involve...
Rajkumar Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
1....W.A.No.1118 of 12 Rajkumar Sharma State of M.P.20.11.2012 Shri Mahendra Pateria, Counsel for the appellant. Shri Vivek Agrawal, G.A.for the respondents. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in view of the specific order issued by the State Government Annexure P-4 dated 30.8.1997, it was decided not to transfer class III clerical employees normally out of the district. It was submitted by Shri Pateria that there was no extra ordinary circumstances in the matter of the appellant who was transferred from Hata district Damoh to district Panna. It was further submitted by Shri Pateria that the appellant and one more employee namely Harish Chandra Ahirwar were the only clerks in tahsil Hata and both have been transferred from district Damoh to District Panna and in their place no other persons have been posted at Hata. On raising such contention, learned counsel appearing for the State submitted that he may be allowed a short time to produce the relevant record in which beca...
Sopanrao Pawar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.5003/2011 Sopanrao Pawar Vs. State of M.P. & others __________________________________________________________ None for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents. __________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi __________________________________________________________ ORDER (20.11.2012) The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner ventilating his grievance that an amount of Rs.1,20,291/- has been recovered from his GPF and other retiral dues allegedly on account of erroneous fixation of his pay. It is contended that petitioner was rightly given the benefit of posting in the pay scale of Rs. 4000-6000/- which was subsequently upgraded in the pay scale of Rs.5200-20200 + 2400 grade pay. It is contended that since the petitioner was promoted on the post of Head Clerk by an Order date...
Govardhan Das Vs. Ashok Kumar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
F.A. No.286/2002 -1- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava F.A. No.286/2002 APPELLANT Govardhan Das s/o Banamal DEFENDANT Badhwani, Proprietor Gopal Garrage, Occupation: Transport Business, Resident of Mission Chowk, KATNI (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENT Ashok Kumar s/o Radhika Prasad PLAINTIFF Katare, R/o Mission Chowk, Subhash Ward, Katni (M.P.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.K. Jain, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel for the respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT { 20 - 11 - 2012 } This first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed at the instance of defendant against the judgment and decree dated 28.6.2002 passed by learned First Additional District Judge, Katni in Civil Suit No.9-A/1994 decreeing the suit of plaintiff/respondent for eviction....
Bhagwandas Vs. Ashok Kumar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
F.A. No.285/2002 -1- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava F.A. No.285/2002 APPELLANTS Bhagwandas (since deceased) not DEFENDANT by LRs:1. Smt. Meera Bai w/o Bhagwan Das 2 Aswani Kumar s/o Bhagwan Das 3 Vijay Kumar s/o Bhagwan Das All R/o 82, Shanti Nagar, Katni 4 Asha Devi d/o Bhagwan Das, w/o Inderlal R/o Keralnin, Near Purani Pani Ki Tanki, Madhav Nagar, Katni. Versus RESPONDENT Ashok Kumar s/o Radhika Prasad PLAINTIFF Katare, R/o Mission Chowk, Subhash Ward, Katni (M.P.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.K. Jain, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel for the respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT { 20 - 11 - 2012 } Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 28.6.2002 passed by learned First Additional District Judge, Katni in Civil Suit No.8-A/1994 decreeing the su...
Priyanka Prathmi Upbhokta, Sahkari Bhandar Mydt. Nagar, Panchayat Bari ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
W.P.No.18503/2012 (Priyanka Prathmik Upbhokta Sahkari Bhandar Mydt. versus State of M.P.& ors.) 20.11.2012 Heard Shri Anil Lala, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 19.10.2012, by which the Sub-Divisional Officer, Lavkush Nagar, Gourihar, District Chhatarpur has directed the Assistant Food Officer, Lavkush Nagar, Chhatarpur to lodge an FIR against the petitioner and in the meanwhile has handed over the functioning of the fair price shop to Sewa Sahakari Samiti, Barigarh. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that admittedly the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal against the impugned order, however he is constrained to file the present petition in view of the fact that the impugned order has been passed pursuant to the letter issued by the Collector, Chhatarpur dated 18.10.2012, who is the appellate authority. Having heard the learned counsel...
Bhagwat Singh Chouhan Vs. Vinod Choudhary
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
Bhagwat Singh Chouhan versus Vinot Choudhary & ORS.Contempt Petition No.843 20. 11.2012: None for the petitioner. Shri Pradeep Gupta, learned counsel for respondents. Keeping in view compliance reported by respondents and from the documents available on record, for the present, no action is required to be taken in the matter. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed, respondents are discharged from the proceedings and liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the action or file a separate petition in case he has any grievance still subsisting in the matter. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-...
Mahendra Singh Sikarwar Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.1591/1999) Mahendra Singh Sikarwar Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1592/1999) Manohar Singh Verma Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1593/1999) Prem Babu Sharma Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1594/1999) R.C. Burra Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1595/1999) Rameshwar Dayal Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1463/1998) Dharmendra Chaudhary Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1686/1998) Prem Singh Bisht 2 W.P. No.1591/1999 and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and others PRESENT : HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV Counsel for petitioner Shri , A.K. Pathak, Advocate and Shri K.C. Ghildayal Counsel for Respondents Shri, Rahul Jain, Deputy Advocate General O R D E R (20/11/2012) The following order of the Court was delivered by Sanjay Yadav, J : Whether a Deputy Superintendent of Police, belonging to Madhya Pradesh Police...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »