Madhya Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rameshwar Dayal Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.1591/1999) Mahendra Singh Sikarwar Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1592/1999) Manohar Singh Verma Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1593/1999) Prem Babu Sharma Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1594/1999) R.C. Burra Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1595/1999) Rameshwar Dayal Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1463/1998) Dharmendra Chaudhary Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1686/1998) Prem Singh Bisht 2 W.P. No.1591/1999 and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and others PRESENT : HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV Counsel for petitioner Shri , A.K. Pathak, Advocate and Shri K.C. Ghildayal Counsel for Respondents Shri, Rahul Jain, Deputy Advocate General O R D E R (20/11/2012) The following order of the Court was delivered by Sanjay Yadav, J : Whether a Deputy Superintendent of Police, belonging to Madhya Pradesh Police...
Swapnil Kumar Tamrakar Vs. the President Dental Council of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
W.P.No.13411/2012 20.11.2012 Shri Shyam Yadav, counsel for petitioner. Shri Mohan Sausarkar, counsel for respondent no.1. Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy.A.G., for respondent nos.2 & 3. Shri Kamlesh Dwivedi, counsel for respondent no.4. I.A.No.14880/2012. A copy of this application is supplied to Shri Mohan Sausarkar. Shri Sausarkar prays for a short time to ascertain the factual position from respondent no.1, in the light of the document filed by the petitioner today, copy of which is supplied to respondent no.1. Learned counsel for State prays one more opportunity to answer the query raised by this Court. Prayer is allowed. Be listed for hearing on 12.12.2012. C.C.as per rules. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) M. Judge Judge...
Prembabu Sharma Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.1591/1999) Mahendra Singh Sikarwar Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1592/1999) Manohar Singh Verma Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1593/1999) Prem Babu Sharma Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1594/1999) R.C. Burra Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1595/1999) Rameshwar Dayal Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1463/1998) Dharmendra Chaudhary Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1686/1998) Prem Singh Bisht 2 W.P. No.1591/1999 and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and others PRESENT : HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV Counsel for petitioner Shri , A.K. Pathak, Advocate and Shri K.C. Ghildayal Counsel for Respondents Shri, Rahul Jain, Deputy Advocate General O R D E R (20/11/2012) The following order of the Court was delivered by Sanjay Yadav, J : Whether a Deputy Superintendent of Police, belonging to Madhya Pradesh Police...
Punjab National Bank Vs. Ganesh Pd. Dubey and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
(1) F.A. No.150/1996 HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava First Appeal No.150 / 1996 Appellant Punjab National Bank, a Nationalised Bank constituted under the Banking Companys (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and Branches inter alia at Mehgaon, Tehsil Vijay Raghavgarh, District Jabalpur (M.P.) Vs. Respondents:1. Ganesh Pd. Dubey, S/o. Keshav Prasad Dubey, Prop. M/s. Sudhanand Lime Workers, Civil Lines, Behind MPEB Office, Katni, District Jabalpur.2. Keshav Prasad Dubey, S/o. Ram Sevak Dubey, Prop. GAnesh Stone Lime, Civil Lines Behind MPEB Office, Katni. ______________________________________________ Shri J.P. Sanghi, Senior Advocate with Shri Mohd. Firoz, Advocate for appellant. Shri Sharad Pandey, Advocate for respondents. ______________________________________________ (2) F.A. No.150/1996 JUDGMENT (Delivered on this 20th day of November, 2012) This first appeal has been filed by the plaintiff/Bank against t...
Bhartendu Singh Bundela Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
Writ Appeal No.1281 o20. 11/2012 Shri Dharmendra Soni, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General for the State. This appeal is admitted for final hearing. Notice on behalf of respondents is accepted by Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General and prays 4 weeks time to file reply in the matter. Prayer is allowed. Ad-interim writ:- It is submitted by Shri Soni that till decision of this appeal, respondent may be restrained to sell minerals for recovery of the fine amount as imposed by the Sub- Divisional Officer. Though the prayer is opposed by Shri Pandey, but considering the Section 5 or Section 18 of the Madhya Pradesh Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2006, we direct, till further ordeRs.no coercive action shall be taken for recovery of the penalty imposed in the matter. CC as per rules. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) JUDGE JUDGE manju Writ Appeal No.1226 o20. 11/2012 Parties present. Be listed for hearing in t...
Shobhnath Singh Kawnar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
Shobhnath Singh Kawnar versus State of M.P.& ORS.Review Petition No.882 20. 11.2012: Shri V.D.S.Chouhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for respondents/State. While disposing of the Writ Petition No.18035/2012 on 31.10.2012 it has been indicated that petitioner has been suspended due to lodging of FIR. It is the case of petitioner that suspension was not due to lodging of FIR but it is because of certain directions of the Collector and, therefore, seeking correction of this factual error, this application is filed. Considering the averments made in the application, the order passed on 31.10.2012 in W.P.No.18035/2012 is corrected to the extent that suspension of petitioner shown to be for lodging of FIR. be deleted and it be indicated that petitioner has been suspended due to orders passed by the Collector.With the aforesaid modification to the order dated 31.10.2012 in W.P.No.18035/2012 this application is allowed. Certified copy as ...
Sandeep Jaiswal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
W.P.No.3307/2012 (Sandeep Jaiswal versus State of MP and otheRs.20.11.2012 Heard Shri Ajay Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.S.Bisen, learned G.A.for the State on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondents/authorities to stop the surveillance initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of M.P.Police Regulations. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents/authorities have placed the petitioner under surveillance on account of the fact that 15 criminal cases were registered against him without taking into consideration the fact that most of the cases are relating to petty offences in which the petitioner has been acquitted and only two cases, one registered against the petitioner in the year 2001 and on the other registered against the petitioner in the year 2009 that are pending against him. It is submitted that the authorities had al...
Manohar Singh Verma Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.1591/1999) Mahendra Singh Sikarwar Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1592/1999) Manohar Singh Verma Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1593/1999) Prem Babu Sharma Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1594/1999) R.C. Burra Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1595/1999) Rameshwar Dayal Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1463/1998) Dharmendra Chaudhary Vs. State of M.P. and others (Writ Petition No.1686/1998) Prem Singh Bisht 2 W.P. No.1591/1999 and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and others PRESENT : HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV Counsel for petitioner Shri , A.K. Pathak, Advocate and Shri K.C. Ghildayal Counsel for Respondents Shri, Rahul Jain, Deputy Advocate General O R D E R (20/11/2012) The following order of the Court was delivered by Sanjay Yadav, J : Whether a Deputy Superintendent of Police, belonging to Madhya Pradesh Police...
Pramod Kumar Mishra Vs. Mp Power Generating Co.Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. W.P.No.7462/2007 Pramod Kumar Mishra. -Versus- Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Co.LTD.and otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. Shri K.C.Ghildiyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respondents. ORDER (20.11.2012) 1: This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of termination from service issued after a departmental enquiry by the disciplinary authority on 18.12.2006 as also the order dated 16.5.2007, by which the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the appellate authority. It is contended that a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner and a departmental enquiry was conducted after obtaining his reply. A second show cause notice was issued to the petitioner after the receipt of the enquiry report by the disciplinary authority of which a reply was filed by the petitioner. However, the reply submitted by the petitioner was not taken into consideratio...
Satish Narayan Datar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
1 W.A.No.1258/2012 Satish Narayan Datar State of M.P.& another 20.11.2012 Shri Praveen Verma, Counsel for appellant. Shri Vivek Agrawal, GA for respondents. This appeal is directed against an order dated 1.10.2012 in Writ Petition No.16363/2012 by which a writ petition preferred by the appellant against his transfer order was dismissed. It was submitted by Shri Verma that the appellant is due to retire on 31.8.2013 and as per policy of the State Government, he can be accommodated at a nearby place to Satna where appellant has to ultimately settle. It was submitted that the place where appellant has been transferred is a distant place and the appellant may be adjusted at a nearby place. On raising such contention, Shri Agrawal, learned counsel for State submitted that appellant may submit a fresh representation for the aforesaid relief and in case any nearby place is vacant, respondents would consider to adjust the appellant at a nearby place. Shri Verma submitted that at Government Mad...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »