Madhya Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.L. Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
Writ Appeal No.1208/2012 (M.L.Yadav ..Vs..State of M.P.and otheRs.18-10-2012 Heard Shri Ishan Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner on the question of admission. The appellant has filed this appeal assailing the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.16777/2012, dated 3-10-2012, whereby the petition filed by the petitioner against the order of his transfer dated 19-7-2012 by which he has been transferred as head clerk from Government College, Budhar to the Government Girls College, Shahdol has been dismissed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the aforesaid order of transfer has been passed by the authorities to accommodate the respondent No.2 who had filed a representation seeking modification of his transfer order and that the impugned order has been passed by the authorities stating that the petitioner is being transferred on his own request. It is submitted that the petitioner has not made any request for his transfer from Budhar to Shahdol a...
Ku. Preeti JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
1 ku. preeti jain versus state W.P.No.17785/2012 18/10/2012: Shri Manot Chansoriya, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Issue notice to the respondents on payment of P.F.within one week returnable in four weeks. From the record it transpires that the Special Leave Petition pending before the Supreme Court at the instance of Education Institute have been decided and the appeals have been allowed and institutes have been directed to issue mark sheets to the petitioneRs.This seems to be the position as is borne out from Annexure P/6. It is a case of the petitioners that the original mark sheets have not been handed over to them by the Board of Secondary Education. Prima facie contention of the petitioners seems to be correct. Records do indicate that the original mark sheets are yet to be handed over by the Board of Secondary Education. That being so, respondents are directed to permit the petitioners herein to participate in the process of counseling on the basis of the duplicate mark sh...
Sanjay Kumar Sonkawde Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
1 W.P.No.17285 o18. 10.2012 Shri Sanjay Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Smt Sheetal Dubey, GA for the respondents. Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashment of the order dated 9.8.12 and 4.9.12 (Annex.P/17 and P/18).In addition to it the prayer for appropriate direction to the respondents/ authorities to renew the lease with respect of the disputed place of restaurant of the petitioner and pursuant to that, the direction to the respondents not to dispossess him from the disputed place of respondent is also made. Having heard the petitioner's counsel, in the available scenario of the matter, instead to admit or issue any notice to the respondents/authorities so also without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities of the respondents No.1 and 2 to consider and decide the pending applications/representations Annex.P/15 and P/16 of the petitioner within 60 ...
Shanker Lodhi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K.Gupta,J CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3420 OF 199.Shanker. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3421 OF 199.Kirat and others. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Siddharth Datt, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 17th day of October, 2012) This judgment passed by me shall govern the disposal of above mentioned Criminal Appeals, since both the appeals arise out of the common impugned judgment dated 17.12.1999 passed by the Third Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar Camp Rehli in ST No.78/1999.2. These criminal appeals are preferred by the appellants being aggrieved by the judgment and order of sentence dated 17/12/1999 passed by the Third Additio...
Sheikh Ayub Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.451/1999 Sheikh Ayub and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellant : Shri Abhinav Dubey, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 17th day of October, 2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 12.2.1999 passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, East Nimar Khandwa in ST. No.203/1998 whereby the appellants were convicted for offence punishable under Section 325 of I.P.C and sentenced for three years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.250/ and in default of payment of fine six months rigorous imprisonment was also directed.2. The prosecution's case, i...
Aarif Khan Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2012
1 Cr. A. No.2083/1996 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.2083/1996 Aarif Khan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Siddharth Datt, counsel for the appellant. Shri G.S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on 17th day of October, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 19.11.1996 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge Raisen, Camp Begumganj in S.T. No.41/94, whereby the appellant was convicted and sentenced for the offences as under:- Section Act Sentence Fine amount Sentence in default of payment of fine 363 I.P.C. Three year's R.I. `1,000/- Three month's S...
Dwarika Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K.Gupta,J CRIMINAL APPEAL No.838 OF 201.Dwarika Singh. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.K.Patel, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Punit Shroti, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 17th day of October, 2012) This criminal appeal is preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment and order of sentence dated 30/3/2012 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Satna in ST No.157/2010, whereby the appellant was convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC and sentenced for five years' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine amount, he was to undergo for one month's RI in addition.2. The prosecutions story, in short,...
Pyare Lal Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.368/1997 Ashok Kumar & another VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.564/1997 Pyarelal VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.Usmani, counsel for the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.368/1997. Smt. Durgesh Gupta, counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.564/1997. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 17th day of October, 2012) Since both the appeals are arising out of the common judgment dated 31.1.1997 passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Katni in S.T.No.267/ 1988, therefore, both the appeals are disposed off by this common judgment. -:- 2 -:- Criminal Appeal No.368 of 1997 Criminal Appeal No...
Bhan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2012
M.Cr.C.No.15051/2011 17.10.2012 On account of some resolution of the M.P.High Court Bar Association the Advocates are abstained from work. Perused the PUD. The same is a memo dated 27.8.2012 received from the Court of IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh seeking extension of time to conclude the trial. On earlier occasion such court was directed to conclude the trial of S.T.No.01/2010 till 30.9.2012. For the reason stated in the aforesaid memo further three months time is extended and the trial court is directed to conclude the trial in compliance of the earlier order on or before 31.12.2012 under intimation to this court. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial court immediately. (U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks...
Ashok Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.368/1997 Ashok Kumar & another VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.564/1997 Pyarelal VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.Usmani, counsel for the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.368/1997. Smt. Durgesh Gupta, counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.564/1997. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 17th day of October, 2012) Since both the appeals are arising out of the common judgment dated 31.1.1997 passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Katni in S.T.No.267/ 1988, therefore, both the appeals are disposed off by this common judgment. -:- 2 -:- Criminal Appeal No.368 of 1997 Criminal Appeal No...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »