Madhya Pradesh Court November 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raja Ram Singh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)MPHT84; 2003(3)MPLJ501
ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 21-9-2000 passed by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (in short 'the Tribunal') in O.A. No. 5054/2000 dismissing his original application, summarily, being premature.2. The petitioner was serving as Assistant Treasury Officer, Balaghat. Earlier a charge-sheet was issued against him on 26-2-1980 and a departmental enquiry was conducted. In the said enquiry, the enquiry officer found that the charges were not proved. However, the disciplinary authority, differing with the findings recorded by the enquiry officer, passed the order on 19-12-1986 directing the petitioner to retire compulsorily. This order which is annexed as Annexure P-5 to this petition, was assailed before this Court by filing a writ petition which was subsequently transferred to the Tribunal and the same was registered as T.A. No. 1150/88 in the Tribunal. The ...
Virendra Singh Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2002
Reported in: 2004ACJ1638
Deepak Verma and N.K. Jain, JJ.1. Mr.Ajay Bagdiya, the learned counsel for the legal representatives of the deceased appellant Virendra Singh; Mr. S.S. Swami, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 and Mr. S.V. Dandvate, learned counsel for respondent No. 5. None appears for other respondents.2. Heard on I.A. No. 2459 of 2002 and M(C)P No. 2222 of 2002 made by the legal representatives of the deceased appellant for their substitution and condonation of delay.3. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by the deceased Virendra Singh for enhancement of the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal below. The Tribunal below has awarded Rs. 7,47,630 for the permanent disability suffered by the deceased in a motor accident. The question now involved is whether the legal representatives of the deceased appellant can prosecute this appeal, which is for enhancement of the amount of compensation. The question has to be answered in the negative.4. This court in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›