Kolkata Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
SHEET GA2804of 2013 With TS3of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF : PROFULLA CHURN LAW (DEC) BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE ARIJIT BAJERJEE Date: 19th August, 2014 Appearance : Mr.Utpal Bose, Sr.Adv.Ms.Koeliya Banerjee, Adv..for the plaintiff/respondent. Mr.Ritobroto Mitra, Adv.Mr.Deb Kumar Sen, Adv.Ms.Taniya Mitra, Adv..for the petitioneRs.The Court: This litigation stems from the Will of late Profulla Churn Law. It is the contention of Mr.Boses client that Profulla Churn Law died having published his last Will and Testament dated 24th September, 1976. Atin Law , Mr.Boses client and the son of the testator has applied for the probate of the said Will. Special citation was issued to Mr.Mitras client being the daughter of the testator. Mr.Mitras client Shelly Roy Chowdhury, has filed her affidavit in support of her caveat and the matter is at the stage of being declared as a contentious cause. GA No.2804 of 2013 is taken out...
Embee Software Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Samir Kumar Shaw and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.2171 of 2012 CS No.77 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE EMBEE SOFTWARE PVT.LTD.Versus SAMIR KUMAR SHAW & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date: 19th August, 2014 Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.with Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.Suddhasatva Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Sarvapriya Mukherjee, Adv.Ms.Radhika Singh, Adv.Mr.Soumabho Ghose, Adv.Ms.S.Nandy, Adv..for the petitioner Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr.Adv.with Mr.Rajat Dutta, Adv.Mr.Sangita Roy, Adv..for the respondents This is an application for amendment of the plaint. The plaintiff while seeking amendment of the existing pleadings has also sought to add the defendant no.5. The petitioner states that after filing of the suit, the plaintiff could ascertain further acts of misdeeds of the defendants. This act of misdeeds has necessitated incorporation of further facts and to make further claim from the same transaction and/or series of transactions against the defendant nos.1 ...
Rajesh Pawar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
ORDER SHEET WP NO.209 OF2003IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE RAJESH PAWAR Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 19th August, 2014. Mr.S.Bandopadhyay, Mr.N.M. Mukherjee, Mr.A.Chakrabortyfor petitioner. The Court : None appears for the respondent authorities even at the second call. No accommodation is sought. The respondents have filed their affidavit in opposition. I do not think the order of the tribunal dated 29th August, 2002 can be sustained. There are several reasons for this. Mr.Bandopadhyay, learned advocate for the petitioner points out that at that point of time import of gold was free. There is no contradiction of the statement. When the situation is that importation of gold was free, a higher onus was on the Revenue to prove that the gold baRs.which were seized from the possession of the appellant, were illegally imported or smuggled. More so, when there was no dispute that the petitioner was ca...
Maheshwary Ispat Limited Vs. Nawn Estates Pvt Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
1 ORDER SHEET APO No.119 of 2014 CS No.132 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MAHESHWARY ISPAT LIMITED Versus NAWN ESTATES PVT LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE Date : 19th August, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Mr.R.Roychowdhury And Mr.S.Sengupta, ld. Advocates For the appellant. Mr.Ajoy Krishna Chatterjee, Sr.Advocate For the respondent. The Court :- The respondent filed a suit, inter-alia, claiming Rs.67.7 lac on the strength of two dishonoured cheques, one for Rs.35 lac dated October 19, 2013 and the other for Rs.32.7 lac issued on November 22, 2013. Needless to mention, both got dishonoured for nonpayment. Previously, the respondent approached the winding up Court by serving statutory notice of demand. The learned Judge relegated the parties to suit by an order dated August 28, 2012 appearing at pages 92-94 of the paper book. The dispute that would surface in the winding up p...
Dadan Singh and anr. Vs. Coal India Limited and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE WP759OF2014DADAN SINGH & ANR. Versus COAL INDIA LIMITED & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 19th August, 2014. Mr.Partha Ghosh, Advocate for petitioners Mr.Alok Kumar Banerjee, Advocate Ms.Sanchita Barman Roy, Advocate .for respondents The Court :- The writ petitioner No.1 became a land loser. His land measuring about 2.01 acres was allegedly damaged by Eastern Coalfields Limited. The respondent company has a scheme. It inter alia provides for compensation and service to those deprived of their lands, subject to conditions. The writ petitioner No.1 has chosen the option of compensation with a claim for employment for his son, the writ petitioner No.2. After going through the decision of the respondent company dated 10th February 2014 it appears that although initially the respondent company was not so minded, but subsequently they had decided to consider the case of the second writ petitioner f...
Vs. Mr. Anindya Dutta
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT No.90 of 2014 G.A.No.2067 of 2014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & TRANSFER PRICING),KOLKATA Versus Mr.ANINDYA DUTTA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 19th August, 2014. Mr.P.Dudhoria, Advocate The Court : Let the appeal be admitted. Let the appeal be heard on the following questions : (a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law in not considering the fact that the right to acquire a property and the acquisition of the property are two different assets within the meaning of Section 2(14) and Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?. (b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law in holding that the CBDT Circular No.471 dated October 15, 1986 was applicable in the instant case in order to decide the ho...
M/S Mmtc Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE G.A.No.1847 of 2014 CEXA No.6 of 2014 M/S MMTC LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 19th August, 2014. Mr.Asok Banerjee, Sr.Adv.Mr.A.Shukla, Adv.Mr.R.Bharadwaj, Adv.The Court : Heard Mr.Asok Banerjee, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant-petitioner and Mr.R.Bharadwaj, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent. Mr.Banerjee relying on a judgment of the Supreme Court in Shyam Sundar Sarma versus Pannalal Jaiswal & ORS.reported in AIR2005SC276 particularly paragraph-10 thereof, submits that at this stage questions should be formulated and the appeal be admitted. Mr.Bharadwaj, learned Advocate for the respondent formulates an additional question which we consider to be a substantial question of law and the case involves such question. Therefore, the appeal is admitted and be heard on the following questions : (a) ...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Kol1 Vs. M/S Caledonion Jute and Industrie ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.2217 of 2014 ITAT No.92 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOL-1 Versus M/S CALEDONION JUTE & INDUSTRIES LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 19th August, 2014. Appearance: Md.Nizamuddin, Adv.The Court : This application and appeal have been filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 31st January, 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench Kolkata, in I.T.A No.52/Kol/2011, relating to assessment year 2004-05. Md.Nizamuddin, learned Advocate for the Revenue, suggests two questions as reframed in place of the questions as evident from paragraph 4 of the application. We find that the reframed questions are the substantial questions and we are satisfied that the case involves such questions. Therefore, let the appeal be admitted and the same will be heard on the following reframed qu...
Kolkata Vs. United Bank of India
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.1495 of 2014 ITAT No.43 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOL-II, KOLKATA Versus UNITED BANK OF INDIA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 19th August, 2014. Appearance: Ms.Smita Das De, Adv.For the Appellant. Mr.Abhratosh Majumder, Adv.For the Respondent. Mr.Soumitra Choudhury, Adv.Mr.Avra Majumder, Adv.The Court : This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 21st November, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A.Nos.199 & 181/Kol/2011 for the assessment year 200708 on the following questions: i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the provisions of Section 115J.is not applicable in the case of the Banking Companies by relying upon the decision of the Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in assessees own case witho...
Zigma Commodities Pvt. Ltd and anr. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward5(3), ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.1911 of 2014 APO No.212 of 2014 WP No.281 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ZIGMA COMMODITIES PVT.LTD & ANR. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3).KOLKATA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 19th August, 2014. Appearance: Mr.R.Bharadwaj, Adv.Mr.P.Dhuduria, Adv.The Court : This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 8th May, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in writ petition, being WP no.281 of 2014 (Zigma Commodities PVT.LTD.& Anr. versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(3).Kolkata & Ors.) whereby the same was dismissed. The petitioner had prayed for cancellation of the show cause notice dated 3rd February, 2014 issued under section 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for short the 1961 Act) and also, inter alia, prayed for a writ in the nature of 2 mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to supply the satisfaction recorded before issuance of the said sho...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »