Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vs. Mr. Anindya Dutta

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Aug 19, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1162968

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Respondent

Mr. Anindya Dutta

Excerpt

order sheet in the high court at calcutta special jurisdiction (income tax) original side itat no.90 of 2014 g.a.no.2067 of 2014 director of income tax (international taxation & transfer pricing),kolkata versus mr.anindya dutta before: the hon'ble justice soumitra pal the hon'ble justice arindam sinha date : 19th august, 2014. mr.p.dudhoria, advocate the court : let the appeal be admitted. let the appeal be heard on the following questions : “(a) whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income tax appellate tribunal erred in law in not considering the fact that the right to acquire a property and the acquisition of the property are two different assets within the meaning of section 2(14) and section 2(47) of the income tax act, 1961?. (b) whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income tax appellate tribunal erred in law in holding that the cbdt circular no.471 dated october 15, 1986 was applicable in the instant case in order to decide the holding period of the two flats for the purpose of computing capital gains ?. (c) whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the income tax appellate tribunal erred in law in holding that the assessee was eligible for exemption under section 54 of the income tax act, 1961 ?.” let requisite number of paper books be prepared containing all relevant papers within eight weeks from the date of service of the signed copy of the order. let copies of paper books be served upon the respondent within a fortnight from the date of preparation of the paper book. in default, the appeal will stand dismissed. g.a.no.2067 of 2014 is thus disposed of. let the appeal appear in the monthly list of january, 2015. (soumitra pal, j.) (arindam sinha, j.) km ar(cr)

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT No.90 of 2014 G.A.No.2067 of 2014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & TRANSFER PRICING),KOLKATA Versus Mr.ANINDYA DUTTA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 19th August, 2014.

Mr.P.Dudhoria, Advocate The Court : Let the appeal be admitted.

Let the appeal be heard on the following questions : “(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law in not considering the fact that the right to acquire a property and the acquisition of the property are two different assets within the meaning of Section 2(14) and Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?.

(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law in holding that the CBDT Circular No.471 dated October 15, 1986 was applicable in the instant case in order to decide the holding period of the two flats for the purpose of computing capital gains ?.

(c) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law in holding that the assessee was eligible for exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?.” Let requisite number of paper books be prepared containing all relevant papers within eight weeks from the date of service of the signed copy of the order.

Let copies of paper books be served upon the respondent within a fortnight from the date of preparation of the paper book.

In default, the appeal will stand dismissed.

G.A.No.2067 of 2014 is thus disposed of.

Let the appeal appear in the Monthly list of January, 2015.

(SOUMITRA PAL, J.) (ARINDAM SINHA, J.) km AR(CR)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial