Kolkata Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Poddar Point Owners and Occupiers Assn. and ors. Vs. Anandilal Poddar ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET GA453of 2014 with CS842of 1989 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PODDAR POINT OWNERS & OCCUPIERS ASSN. & ORS.Versus ANANDILAL PODDAR & SONS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date : 18th February, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Joy Saha, Adv.Mr.Rajdeep Bhattacharya, Adv.Mr.Sukumar Pal, Adv..for the petitioner Mr.D.Mitra, Adv.Mrs.Debjani Mitra, Adv..for the Administrator The Court: Affidavit of service filed in connection with the instant matter indicates service of notice upon all concerned. In spite of service none appears on behalf of the defendants / respondents. This is an application taken out by the plaintiff / petitioner no.1 seeking discharge of the Administrator appointed in CS No.842 of 1989. In this application, the applicant has also prayed for management, maintenance and control of the building, known as Poddar Point, situated at 113, Park Street, Kolkata-700016 to be vested with the plaintiff / petitioner no.1 ...
Shyama Enclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sanjib Kr. Roy and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET CS No.262 of 2001 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SHYAMA ENCLAVE PVT.LTD.Versus SANJIB KR. ROY & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 18th February, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Joy Saha, Adv.The Court: The affidavit of service shows that the defendant no.2(i) could not be served as the rooms were found to be locked. In view thereof, leave is given to the plaintiff to cause substituted service. The draft notice shall be placed before the learned Registrar, Original Side within a week for settlement. The notice shall be published once in The Statesman and once in Bishwamitra. The plaintiff shall file the affidavit of service on the next date of hearing. The notice must specify the returnable date of the suit. The suit shall appear eight weeks hence. An oral prayer is made on behalf of the defendant no.2(b) for extension of time to file written statement. The written statement shall be filed within three weeks from date up...
M/S. Sarvopari Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise, ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.122 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.SARVOPARI IMPEX PVT.LTD.Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HALDIA COMMISSIONERATE & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 18th February, 2014. Appearance : Mr.V.N.Dwiyedi, Adv.Mr.Sourav Bagaria, Adv. for the petitioners Mr.S.B. Saraf, Adv.Mr.K.K. Maity, Adv. for the Central Excise The Court : The petitioner submits that his remission application has been disposed of by the authority without affording an opportunity of hearing. It is further submitted that the proceeding initiated on the basis of the show-cause notices were taken up together and were disposed of by an original order dated 30.03.2012 wherein recording is also made that the remission application is also decided. The petitioner says that the remission application is an independent proceeding and was not connected with the aforesaid proceedings initiated on the basis of the show-cause notic...
Rabindra Prasad Kharwar Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Debasish Kar Gupta February 18, 2014 WP120of 2014 Rabindra Prasad Kharwar versus State of West Bengal & ORS.Mr.Saktipada Jana, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Amitesh Banerjee, Advocate with MRS.Reshmi Ghosh, Advocate for the State The Court :- This application is directed against an order passed by the respondent no.3 under Memo No.298/1(Law) dated August 20, 2013. By virtue of the impugned order the respondent no.3 rejected the claim of the petitioner for approval in the appointment to the post of non-teaching staff of Vishuddhananda Saraswati Vidyalaya (H.S.).District Kolkata. According to the petitioner the above order was passed reiterating the grounds for rejection of the above claim of the petitioner on earlier occasions which had been set aside by the order passed in connection with the writ applications filed by the petitioner on previous occasions as also without giving an...
Dassani Electra Private Limited and anr. Vs. the Director General,
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.90 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE DASSANI ELECTRA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. Versus THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, WEST BENGAL FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Date : 18th February, 2014 Mr.Pratap Chatterjee,, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Atish Ghosh, Advocate Mr.A.Chandra, Advocate ..for the petitioners Mr.Bilwadal Bhattacharya, Advocate ..for the respondent This writ petition is directed against an order dated 1st November, 2013 passed by the Director General, West Bengal Fire & Emergency Services. The said order, based on a prior inspection, proceeds to revoke the fire safety certificate issued vide memo no.WBFES/5003/13/KOL/AB/560/13 dated 18.09.13 with immediate effect on the ground that fire safety recommendations are not complied with properly in the premises in question. Heard Mr.Chatterjee, learned senior advocate for the petitioners and Mr.Bhattacharya, learned advocate for the respo...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET CP No.547 of 2013 CA No.289 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction IN THE MATTER OF : TULIP MACHINERIES PVT.LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 18th February, 2014. Mr.A.Mitra, Advocate with Mr.D.N.Sharma, Advocate..for petitioneRs.Ms.Shanta Mitra, Advocate..for Central Government. The Court :-Three objections have been raised by the Central Government to the scheme sought to be approved. The fiRs.objection relates to an inspection of the transferor company no.3 in which case the inspection is completed and the RoC, West Bengal has been directed to file proceedings against the Director of the company. Therefore, no further inspection needs to be undertaken in respect of the transferor company no.3. As regards transferor company no.2 an order for inspection has been made but inspection has not been initiated. Inspection in no way against the transferor company no.2 will be hindered and the transferee company may be called upon to produc...
Govind V. Patel and anr. Vs. C.E.S.C. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET WP NO.197 OF2005IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GOVIND V. PATEL & ANR. Versus C.E.S.C.LTD. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 18th February, 2014. Mr.S.Dasfor petitioner. MRS.R.Mukherjeefor CESC LTD.The Court : This writ petition is at the instance of a consumer of electricity whose supply was disconnected by the licensee on the allegation of pilferage. The writ petitioner upon suffering disconnection for the second time had come up by way of this writ petition and prayed that the bill dated 10th January, 2005 for Rs.7,95,408/- raised by the licensee be quashed and the supply restored. On 7th February, 2005 an interim order was made by which conditions for restoration were directed. In addition directions were made to remove the existing meter in presence of representative of the writ petitioner no.1, to keep the same in a sealed bag and thereafter send it for necessary examination to ascertain whether the allegatio...
M/S. Purbanchal Estates Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. K. M. C.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET WP NO.768 OF2005IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.PURBANCHAL ESTATES PVT.LTD.& ANR. Versus K.M.C. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 18th February, 2014. Mr.A.Mitra, Ms.P.Sengupta, Mr.P.Naskar, Mr.R.Sarkarfor petitioneRs.Mr.A.K. Baanerjee, Mr.R.Chakrabortyfor KMC. The Court : The writ petitioner no.1 claims to be a co-owner of the property being premises no.3, Alipore Park Place, Kolkata-27. By reason of disputes regarding the assessment of valuation of the said property an order in appeal being order dated 15th December, 2003 was made by the Division Bench of this Court. By that order the parties were directed to appear on 5th January, 2004 at 11:30 a.m.before the Municipal Commissioner, lead necessary evidence if they chose and the Commissioner was to decide the question and pass a speaking order to that effect. It appears that on 5th January, 2004 the parties were before the Municipal Commissioner but, accordi...
Prasanta Kumar Mitra and ors. Vs. India Steam Laundry (P) Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE C.A.C.P.C.A.C.A.No.No.No.No.755 611 485 493 of of of of 2011 1988 2011 2011 Prasanta Kumar Mitra & ORS.Versus India Steam Laundry (P) LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 18th February, 2014. For Petitioner No.3 : Mr.P.C.Sen with Mr.Sudipto Sarkar, Sr.Adversus with Mr.R.R.Sen & Mr.G.Roy, Adversus For Indrajit Roy & Jayati Roy : Mr.Joydeep Kar with Mr.S.Bandopadhyay, Adversus For Srila Mitra & Binota Basu : Mr.Joy Saha with Mr.D.Mukherjee & Mr.R.K.Mitra, Adversus For Respondent No.3 : Mr.S.B.Mookherjee, Sr.Adv.with Mr.D.N.Sharma, Adv.For Respondent No.4 : Mr.S.N.Mukherjee, Sr.Adv.This matter is listed under the heading To be Mentioned at the instance of the petitioner no.3 for correction of typographical errors which crept up in the order dated 6th February, 2014. Accordingly, the corrections are made as follows : 1)(a) In the appearance for the petitioner no.3 at page 1 of the said order, the ...
Atul Gupta and ors Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.98 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ATUL GUPTA AND ORS Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 18th February, 2014. Appearance : Mr.Sukrit Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.S.B. Saraf, Adv.The Court : Affidavit of service filed today be kept on record. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that despite the order of the assessing authority relating to the seized jewelleries and articles in favour of the petitioner the authorities have unreasonably withheld the said jwelleries and articles despite the repeated request for release thereof. The learned advocate appearing for the respondent authorities on instruction submits that the authorities have never denied the release of those seized articles belonging to each of the petitioners but have asked them to submit the succession certificate in support of their claiMs.I am amazed whether such a stand can at all be said to be co...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »