Kolkata Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramesh Kumar Singhania Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(4), Purulia and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
ORDER SHEET GA No.1835 of 2013 ITAT No.122 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE RAMESH KUMAR SINGHANIA Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3 4).PURULIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANINDITA ROY SARASWATI Date :27. h August, 2013. Appearance: Mr.R.Bharadwaj, Adv.Mr.S.B.Saraf, Adv.The Court: This appeal is directed against an order dated 15th February, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Kolkata, allowing the appeal of the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 23rd March, 2010 in Appeal No.157/CIT(A) Asl/W- 3(4)/Purulia/2009-10, whereby the Commissioner of Income Tax had confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer of Rs.17,77,975/- on account of alleged difference in value of stock. It appears that there is a discrepancy in the figures as contained in the balance-sheet prepared on 31st March, 2006 and in accounts submitted to the bank...
Dutta Agro Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sayan International Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
ORDER SHEET C.P.354 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE DUTTA AGRO MILLS PVT.LTD.Versus SAYAN INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date:26. h August, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Debjani Chatterjee, Adv.Mr.S.Dutt Majumdar, Adv.Mr.Uttiya Ray, Adv.Mr.Kuldip Mullick, Adv.The Court: The winding up petition was admitted on 9th April, 2013 directing the company to pay the principal sum of Rs.42 lac together with the interest @ 10% per annum from the date of the statutory notice still payment. The Court further directed the payment of the costs assessed at 1500 GMs.The entire amount was directed to be paid by six instalments beginning from April 30, 2013. Admittedly, four instalments have been paid. The fifth instalment is due on 31st August, 2013. The company mentions the matter for extension of time to pay the balance two instalments. The company says that because of some financial stringency those instalments cannot be paid within ti...
infoserive Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Official Liquidator
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
CA No.392 of 2013 CP No.539 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION In the matter of: Eastern Indian Institute of Medical Science and Research Hospital (In Liqn.) And Infoserive PVT.LTD.Versus The Official Liquidator Before: The Hon'ble Justice Harish Tandon Date:26. h August 2013 Appearance: Mr.Jishnu Choudhury, Advocate for the petitioner Ms.Smita Das Dey, Advocate for the official liquidator The Court: This is an application at the instance of the company who claims to be the unsecured creditor of Eastern India Institute of Medical Science and Research Hospital Limited. The applicant says that the said company was wound up by an order of this Court and the official liquidator was appointed to take the possession and custody of the assets of the company. The official liquidator hands over the copy of the order dated 21st May 2009 passed by the Division Bench in APO No.297 of 2008 by which the official liquidator who could not take possession of the company (in liq...
Rupen Basu Mallick Vs. Prabir Basu Mallick
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
ORDER SHEET GA No.2023 of 2013 PLA No.46 of 2006 TS No.12 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF : MADHABENDRA BASU MALLICK (DEC) AND RUPEN BASU MALLICK versus PRABIR BASU MALLICK BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :26. h August, 2013. Mr.Siddhartha Mitra, Sr.Adv.Ms.Pooja Das Choudhury, Adv.for Rupen Basu Mallick Mr.Hirak Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Dipayan Choudhury, Adv.for the applicant The Court : The petitioner seeks correction of order dated 12th August, 2013.13. and 13B. be corrected to 14A, Radhanath Mallick Lane and locked door is at the entrance in the 4 ft. passage leading to lot B. The staircase is the main bone of contention between the two parties. Admittedly the owner of lot A has not constructed his staircase which he was entitled to do and the only explanation given is that once mutation and separation is effected can such application for construction of staircase be filed with the Kolkata Municipal Corpo...
Hasan Kamaal Vs. Asha Audio Co. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.2306 of 2013 APOT No.363 of 2013 CS No.202 of 2013 HASAN KAMAAL Versus ASHA AUDIO Co.AND ORS.For Appellant : Mr.Anindya Mitra Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury Mr.Ayan Banerjee Mr.Satadeep Bhattacharyya Mr.Nibedita Sarkar Mr.Amitava Ganguly. For Anand Shrivasthava : Mr.Pratap Chatterjee Mr.Ranjan Bachawat Mr.Debnath Ghosh Mr.Soumay Ray Chowdhury Ms.Soma Rahman. For Respondent No.2 : Mr.Ravi kapur Mr.Chayan Gupta Mr.Dwipraj Basu. For Respondent No.4 : Mr.Shaktinath Mukherjee Mr.Abhrajit Mitra Mr.Ritabrata Mitra Mr.Soumabho Ghose Mr.A.K. Chwdhury. For Union of India : Mr.Kausik Chanda For Respondent No.6 : Mr.Anirban Roy Mr.Debabrata Das. For Sameer Pandey : Mr.Sayan Roy Chowdhury Ms.Sanchari Chakraborty. For S.S.Sodhi : Mr.Rupak Ghosh Mr.Sunil Singhania. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASIM KUMAR MONDAL Date :26. h August, 2013. The Court : This is an appeal by the respond...
L and T Finance Limited Vs. Ramneek Singh and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
AP No.272 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE L & T FINANCE LIMITED Versus RAMNEEK SINGH & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :26. h August, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Samrat Sen, Adv.Mr.P.Sinha Mr.K.C. Garg, Adv.The Court : GA No.2490 of 2013 is an application for substitution of the deceased respondent no.1 to the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The mother of the deceased respondent no.1 who died unmarried is substituted in place and stead of the deceased respondent no.1. Let the amendment be carried out in the presence of an officer of Court and a copy of the amended petition served on the substituted fiRs.respondent. GA No.2490 of 2013 is allowed as above without any order as to costs. AP No.272 of 2013 is the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner says that possession of the asset was taken prior to the matter coming to Court and...
Union of India Vs. Pawan Construction Company
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
ORDER SHEET GA NO.2512 OF 201.APOT NO.403 OF 201.AP NO.509 OF 201.GA NO.2511 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE UNION OF INDIA Versus PAWAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE Dr. SAMBUDDHA CHAKRABARTI Date :26. h August, 2013. Appearance : Mr.Moloy Kumar Das, Advocate Mr.Anirban Dutta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Amitava Ghosh, Advocate Mr.Sourav Chatterjee, Advocate for the respondent. The Court : This appeal is barred by 37 days. Causes being sufficient, delay is condoned. The appeal is taken on record. Since the question of maintainability is urged, by consent of parties, we take up the hearing of the appeal itself. We have heard Mr.Moloy Kumar Das, learned Counsel appearing for the railway being assisted by Mr.Anirban Dutta and Mr.Amitava Ghosh, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent. As per the agreement, two Arbitrators were to be appointed. Two Arbitrators were conducting...
Shree Shree Iswar Satyanarayanjee and ors Vs. Amstar Investment Pvt Lt ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
1 ORDER SHEET APO No.242 of 2013 AP No.630 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SHREE SHREE ISWAR SATYANARAYANJEE & ORS Versus AMSTAR INVESTMENT PVT LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE Dr. SAMBUDDHA CHAKRABARTI Date :26. h August, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Malay Ghosh with Mr.S.K. Dutt, Mr.Prasanta Baskar and Mr.S.S.Bhutoria Ld. Advocates for the appellant. Mr.Joy Saha with Mr.Reetobroto Mitra Ld. Advocates for the respondent. The chequered Court :- This appeal has a career. No one would disagree with us if we call the backdrop unfortunate, even we cannot extend any relief for want of appropriate legal support. Yet our conscience would prick and we would be failing in our duty if we do not record the relevant facts. The appellant would claim, the deity was the owner of the subject property let out to the respondent. The respondent would, however, dispute the ownership, at least to a substantial extent, which they claim the...
Arindam Biswas Vs. Idbi Bank Limited and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
CS 29.of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE ARINDAM BISWAS Versus IDBI BANK LIMITED & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :26. h August, 2013. Mr.Joy Saha,Advocate appeaRs.Mr.Amitava Das,Advocate appeaRs.Mr.Dhruba Ghosh,Advocate appeaRs.Ms.Ahana Sikdar,Advocate appeaRs.The Court :- It appears that due to inadvertence in the deposition recorded on 22nd July,2013, there are mistakes in the numbering and question No.270 in cross examination should have been question No.384. Accordingly, the numbering as recorded in the deposition dated 22nd July,2013 shall be corrected and question No.270 should be read as question No.384. The subsequent question numbers as recorded in the said order also need be corrected accordingly. The department is directed to carry out such corrections and supply the corrected copies of depositions to the parties without any requisition to be filed by the parties. The Courts records shall also be accordingly corrected. The plaintiff is perm...
Gautam Agarwalla and ors. Vs. Chakradhar Lal Agarwalla and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
ORDER SHEET GA No.2386 of 2013 CS No.265 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction GAUTAM AGARWALLA & ORS.Versus CHAKRADHAR LAL AGARWALLA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :26. h August, 2013. Mr.Rajasekhar Mantha, Mr.Mohit gupta, Mr.Arik Banerjee, Mr.K.R. Das for the petitioneRs.Mr.Samit Talukdar, Sr.Adv., Ms.Hasnuhana Chakraborty for respondent no.3. Mr.Suman Dutt for respondent No.6. Mr.Aniruddha Mitra, Mr.D.K. Sinha for respondent no.1. The Court : In a suit for a declaration that the petitioners are entitled to be partners of the respondent no.7 this application has been filed for interim reliefs. The case of the petitioners is that Nandram Hunatram was a partnership firm founded by Kishanlal, Sohanlal, Bhaniram and Hunatram. It was specifically stated in the partnership deed that on expiry of any of the partners the partnership would continue and therefore, on the demise of Hunatram his legal heirs and representative continued to be ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »