Kolkata Court March 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bank of India Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-14-2012
PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J. Appellant Bank has preferred the instant appeal assailing the judgment and order passed by a learned Judge of this court whereby the learned Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant and allowed the counter-claim filed on behalf of the employee. The relevant facts for deciding the instant appeal are briefly stated hereinafter. The respondent no. 2 herein was employed as clerk in the appellant bank. According to the appellant bank, India Card was issued to the said respondent no. 2 while he was serving the bank as an employee. It has been alleged on behalf of the appellant bank that the said respondent no. 2 misused the facilities of the India Card, which was issued to him by the bank on 24th September, 1996. It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant bank that the spending limit of the said India card issued to the respondent no. 2 was Rs. 20000/- only. It is the case of the appellant bank that the said workman used the aforesaid cred...
Paritosh Kumar Dey and Others Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-14-2012
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging inaction on the part of the Tehsildar, Rangat, Middle Andaman, in refusing to mutate the names of the petitioners in relation to the disputed properties. The properties, admittedly, belonged to Sushanto Kumar Dey. He purportedly executed a will, which was registered on December 3, 2004, allegedly bequeathing his estate in favour of his three sons. The said Sushanto Kumar Dey died on April, 20, 2005 leaving behind him his six daughters and three sons. His wife is, already, dead. It seems that disputes have developed between the daughters and the sons of the deceased. The daughters applied for mutation of their names in respect of the disputed property. Subsequently, the sons, also, applied for mutation of their names, excluding the names of their sisters, in respect of the selfsame properties on the basis of the said registered will. The Tehsildar considered the said applications...
M/S. Triveni Sheet Glass Works Limited Vs. Yogesh Chandra Agarwal and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-2012
Tarun Kumar Gupta, J. This is an appeal against a judgment of acquittal dated 19th May, 1999 passed by learned A.C.J.M., Alipore in T. R. No.34 of 1997. By the judgment impugned learned Trial Court acquitted both the respondent accused persons. Being aggrieved with said judgment of acquittal the complainant company has filed this appeal. The appellant complainant’s case may be summarized as follows:- M/s. Triveni Sheet Glass Works Limited is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. Said Company is the owner of flat No.101, first floor, Saikat Apartment at 274 Parnasree Pally, P. S. Behala. Accused No.1 Yogesh Chandra Agarwal came to Calcutta some time in September, 1994 in connection with his service in a private firm and approached Mr. P. N. Agarwal, one of the directors of said company to provide him a temporary accommodation. Sri P. N. Agarwal permitted accused No.1 along with his wife being accused No.2 to live in said company’s flat as a licensee wi...
In the Matter of : Hanif Chowdhury
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-2012
This application under Section 439 of the Cr. P. C. has been taken out by Hanif Chowdhury, an accused praying for bail in connection with Khanakul Police Station Case No.12 of 2012 dated 6.1.2012 under Sections 323/324/325/379/380/384/504/506(2) of the I.P.C. Heard Mr. Ray, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mrs. Patel, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State of West Bengal/opposite party who opposes the prayer for bail. Perused the C.D. and the materials therein. On perusal of the C.D. and the annexures to the application, it appears to me that there are cases and counter cases between the two families and in this case, investigation is concluded on filing of the charge sheet. The accused/petitioner is in custody for quite a long period. His detention in custody for the purpose of investigation is not required. Accordingly, I allow the prayer for bail. The petitioner may find bail of Rs.5,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of th...
Jeevan Ram Vs. the Lieutenant Governor and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-2012
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the award dated July 22, 2011 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court at Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, in Industrial Dispute Case No.10 of 2006. By the award impugned the learned Presiding Officer, inter alia, held that the workman concerned was not entitled to get any relief. Being aggrieved the workman has come before this Court with this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The workman was engaged as a Daily Rated Mazdoor at Rangat office of the Deputy Conservator of Forest (Slivi Culture), Port Blair. The workman stated that he was engaged as Daily Rated Mazdoor for the period between October 11, 1993 to December 31, 1994 continuously, but with artificial breaks. Therefore, he had completed 240 (two hundred forty) days of continuous service in a calendar year. Nevertheless, his service was terminated with effect from January, 1...
Rajeev Maheswari and Others Indu Kocher and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-2012
K.J. Sengupta, J. The above appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 5th September, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in the aforesaid Special Suit under Arbitration Act, 1940 (since repealed). The learned Trial Judge has been pleased to pass orders though not expressly but in substance, allowing prayer of the respondents for filing of the arbitration agreement dated 23rd December, 1972, and directing the parties to nominate their respective learned Arbitrators and also to appoint Umpire in anticipation. The short fact leading to preferring this appeal is as follows:- The respondents herein are the heirs and legal representatives of one Mohanlal Kocher since deceased whereas the appellants are the heirs and legal representatives of one Mohanlal Maheswari. The predecessor-in-interest of both the parties namely Mohanlal Maheswari and Mohan Kocher formed a partnership firm in or about January 1955 for the purpose of carrying on business under the ...
Rajeev Maheswari and Ors…appellants/Petitioners Vs. Indu Kocher and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-2012
A.P.O.No.472 of 2007 S.S.No.9 of 1995 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PRESENT: The Honble JUSTICE KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND The Honble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI Rajeev Maheswari & orsappellants/petitioners versus Indu Kocher & Ors..respondents Judgment on:13. 3.2012. K.J.Sengupta, J.:The above appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 5th September, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in the aforesaid Special Suit under Arbitration Act, 1940 (since repealed).The learned Trial Judge has been pleased to pass orders though not expressly but in substance, allowing prayer of the respondents for filing of the arbitration agreement dated 23rd December, 1972, and directing the parties to nominate their respective learned Arbitrators and also to appoint Umpire in anticipation. The short fact leading to preferring this appeal is as follows:The respondents herein are the heirs and legal representatives of one Mohanlal K...
L and T Finance Limited Vs. Ranjit Rana and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-2012
ORDER SHEET EC No.522 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE L & T FINANCE LIMITED Versus RANJIT RANA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :13. h March, 2012. Appearance: Mr.P.Sinha, Advocate Ms.Shampa Sarkar, Advocate, Receiver The Court: It is submitted by the Receiver who is present in Court that further to the order dated 5th January, 2012, notice was given to the judgement debtors regarding the sale of the three equipments. Offers were also invited from the public. Neither the judgement debtors brought any offer not any offer was received from the public. However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner in Court today that they have obtained an offer of Mr.Pankaj Chandra Shekhar Bajoria, Anand State Bank Coloney, Jail Quarter Road, Near Dr. Borade Hospital, Chaprsipura Camp, Amravat602. being a composite offer to purchase the above three equipment for a sum of Rs.19 lakh. Considering the above facts and circumstanc...
Vs. Ms/Mrs Moitrali Mukherjee
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-2012
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE APOT No.687 of 1997 CP No.12 of 1997 CASION FINANCE & INVESTMENT INDIA LTD Versus MS/Mr.MOITRALI MUKHERJEE And APOT No.282 of 1999 CP No.12 of 1997 CASION FINANCE & INVESTMENT (I) LTD Versus MOITRALI MOOKHERJEE And APOT No.297 of 1999 CP No.12 of 1997 CASION FINANCE & INVESTMENT (INDIA) LTD Versus MOITRALI MOOKHERJEE And APOT No.671 of 1996 CP No.316 of 1991 UNITED BANK OF INDIA Versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR And APOT No.447 of 1997 CP No.362 of 1996 SHYAM SUNDER KEJRIWAL Versus DUNCAN LEASING & FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.And APOT No.448 of 1997 CP No.363 of 1996 SUPRA EXPORTS Versus DUNCAN LEASING & FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.And APOT No.449 of 1997 CP No.364 of 1996 BIMAL KUMAR KEJRIWAL Versus DUNCAN LEASING & FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.And APOT No.560 of 1997 CP No.418 of 1996 ICI INDIA LTD.Versus NAFFAR CHAND JUTE MILLS LTD.And APOT No.561 of 1997 CP No.418 of 1996 ICI INDIA LTD.Versus NAFFAR CHAND JUTE MILLS LTD....
…appellant Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income-tax) Original Side PRESENT: The Honble JUSTICE KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND The Honble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI I.T.A.No.269 of 2003 Bhutaria Valve Udyog LTD.appellant versus Commissioner of Income Tax, .respondent Judgment on:13. 3.2012. K.J.Sengupta, J.:This appeal has been admitted for hearing by an order dated 16th May, 2005 on the following substantial questions of law:(i) Whether the Tribunal acted within its authority and/or jurisdiction by directing assessment of arrears of rent in the year of receipt and upholding the reopening of the assessments for the assessment years 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96 on such basis when the assessments were reopened and orders were passed by the Assessing Officer on the ground that increase in rent agreed upon subsequent to the relevant previous years with retrospective effect was chargeable to tax in the previous years to which such increase related and the purported findings of the Tribuna...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »