Karnataka Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.N. Kumara @ Theerthakumara Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by th ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: This CRL.A. is filed under S.374(2) CR.P.C., praying to set aside the Judgment of Conviction and Sentence dated 18/20.1.2010 passed by the PRL. Sessions Judge, Tumkur, In S.C.NO.20/2007, convicting the Appellants/Accused for the offence punishable under S.304 R/W S.34 of IPC. The Appellants/Accused sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and in default to pay the fine amount, to undergo further R.I. for a period of five months, for the offence punishable under S.304 R/W S.34 of IPC.) 1. The appellants faced prosecution for the offences punishable under Ss.302 and 323 read with S.34 of IPC and after trial in S.C. No.20/2007, on the file of the Prl. Sessions Judge at Tumkur and were found guilty as per the Judgment dated 18/20.01.2010 and convicted under the latter part of S.304 read with S.34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years and pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further R.I. for...
The Management of Lakshmanan Isola Pvt. Ltd., Vs. M. Venkatachalaiah
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
1. The petitioner-Management is before this Court assailing the award dated 01.02.2008 passed by the II Addl. Labour Court in I.D.No.38/1995 impugned at Annexure-L to the petition. By the said award, the Labour Court has directed the petitioner to reinstate the respondent-Workman into service to his original post with continuity of service and consequential benefits from 06.03.1995, but with backwages of 50%. The petitioner-Management therefore claims to be aggrieved by the award. 2. The brief facts are that the respondent- Workman joined the petitioner-Management on 01.10.1986 as Office boy. While he was thus working, the respondent-Workman is stated to have developed back pain due to which he could not attend to the work regularly and he also underwent treatment. Though the respondent-Workman thereafter sent the letter seeking medical leave, the same was not considered. The respondent-Workman contends that when he recovered and sought to report for work on 06.03.1995, he was not perm...
Venkataswamy and Another Vs. The Tahsildar, Kolar District and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
1. These petitions are filed seeking to quash the order dated 2-7-2015 passed by the Court of Principal Sessions Judge at Kolar in M.A.No.17 of 2011 produced as per Annexure-F and also to quash the order dated 26-8-2010 passed by respondent 1 in INA.CR. No.325/1978-79 produced as per Annexure-D. 2. The brief facts leading to filing of these petitions are, the schedule lands bearing Sy.Nos.16, 18, 19, 54, 65, 71 and 161 of Malur Taluk, Lakkur Hobli, Alambadi Village are the thoti inam lands. Dodda Madduramma and Chikka Madduramma claiming through one Thoti Muniga, the erstwhile village office holder had made a claim for regrant of schedule lands before respondent 1-Tahsildar, Malur Taluk, Kolar District in INA CR.No.325/78-79. After holding due enquiry, respondent 1 was pleased to allow the claim and had regranted the schedule lands equally to the said Dodda Madduramma and Chikka Madduramma by order dated 13-5-1985. Consequently, mutation was also effected in their names in MR No.62 of ...
State by Holehonnur Police Vs. Parameshwarappa and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Sections 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. praying to grant leave to file an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 23.07.2011, passed by the Sessions Judge, I Fast Track Court, Shimoga, in S.C.No.111/2008 acquitting the respondents/accused for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 114, 302 r/w Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, and to set aside the judgment and order of acquittal and convict and sentence the accused/respondents for the offences with which they have been charged.) 1. The Judgment and Order of acquittal dated 23.7.2011 passed by the I Fast Track Court, Shimoga in Sessions Case No.111/2008 is called in question in this appeal by the State Government. By the impugned Judgment, the trial Court has acquitted the accused of the offences punishable under Sections 498-1, 114, 302 r/w Section 34 of IPC. 2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that the deceased Bhagya is the husband of Accused No.1- Parameswarappa; Accused...
The Central Silk Board Vs. Smt. Gayathri Ananth
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE2d DAY OF MARCH2016PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NO.3402/2016 (S-CAT) BETWEEN:1. THE CENTRAL SILK BOARD MINISTRY OF TEXTILES GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CSB COMPLEX, B T M LAYOUT MADIVALA BANGALORE - 560068 REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. THE JOINT DIRECTOR (ADMN) THE CENTRAL SILK BOARD CSB COMPLEX, B T M LAYOUT MADIVALA BANGALORE - 560068 THE DIRECTOR NATIONAL SILKWORM SEED ORGANISATION CENTRAL SILK BOARD2 3.4. 5.6. 7.8. 2 CSB COMPLEX, B T M LAYOUT MADIVALA, BANGALORE 560068 THE DIRECTOR (I/C) CENTRAL SILK TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE CENTRAL SILK BOARD CSB COMPLEX, B T M LAYOUT MADIVALA, BANGALORE - 560068 THE DIRECTOR CENTRAL SERICULTURAL RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE SRIRAMPURA, MANANDAVADI ROAD MYSORE - 570008 THE DIRECTOR CENTRAL SERICULTURAL RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE SRIRAMPURA, MANANDAVADI ROAD MYSORE - 570008 THE DIRECTOR SILK WORM SEED TECHN...
Kashi V. Manjunath Vs. K.V. Nagarathnamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash aside the order dated 17.2.2014 on I.A.No. 23,26 and 27 in FDP No.07/2007 pending on the file of Honb'le Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Arsikere, vide Annx-A and etc.) 1. These petitions are filed by the petitioner, who was the petitioner in FDP proceedings, requesting the Court to set-aside the order dated 17.02.2014 passed on the applications I.A.Nos.23, 26 and 27 in FDP No.07/2007 by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Arsikere, produced at Annexure-A. The said applications i.e., I.A.Nos.23, 26 and 27 are filed in the FDP proceedings by respondent No.7 therein, which were opposed by the petitioner by filing the detailed objections; after considering the merits of the applications, ultimately, the Trial Court allowed the said applications. Being aggrieved by the said order, petitioner is before this Court. 2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the petition...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanda and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
B. Manohar, J. 1. The United India Insurance Company has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 26.2.2010 passed by the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Sub-Division-1, Belgaum, in WCA:SR:31/2009 (hereinafter referred to as 'the WCC' for brevity). 2. The respondents 1 to 4 herein filed the claim petition contending that husband of claimant No. 1 and father of claimant Nos. 2 to 4, Nagesh Lad was working as a driver in the lorry bearing registration No. KA- 22/7327 belonging to the 5th respondent herein. On 15.12.2008, after loading the sand while he was proceeding towards Machche, due to stress and strain developed chest pain. He had parked the lorry and taken rest in the vehicle itself. However, he died in the lorry due to cardiac arrest. Immediately, a complaint was lodged before the Belagavi Rural Police Station, which has been registered as Crime No. 51/2008. The post mortem has been conducted and it was found that the cause of death w...
Anindita Kar Vs. Sudip Nath Choudhury
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
(Prayer: This Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to call for the record and quash the impugned order dated 19.8.2015 passed on IA.No.5 in MC.No.3420/2013 on the file of IV Addl. Principal Family Judge, at Bengaluru, Annex-E and allow the application IA.No.5 in MC.No.3420/2013 on the file of IV Addl, Principal family Judge, at Bengaluru.) 1. The Petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 19.08.2015 passed on I.A.No.5 in M.C.No.3420/2013 at Annexure-E to the petition. In that light, the petitioner is seeking that the application in I.A.No.5. in M.C.No.3420/2013 be allowed. 2. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. Due to certain difference in their marital life, they are residing separately. The petition in M.C.No.3420/2013 is instituted by the petitioner-wife seeking dissolution of the marriage. In the pending petition, she has filed an application under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act in I.A.No.5 seeking t...
Gajanan Ramachandra Velangi Vs. Vijaya Irappa @ Chudamani Undre and Ot ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
(Prayer: This WA filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India praying that the order of learned single Judge dated 11.02.2015 passed in W.P.No.68108 of 2010 may Kindly be set aside and the writ appeal may be allowed.) H.G. Ramesh J. (Oral): 1. Whether an Arbitral Tribunal having authority to receive evidence, has the power under Section 33 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 ( the Act ), to impound any instrument (document) as defined under Section 2 (j) of the Act, if it is not duly stamped? This is the question that requires determination in this appeal. The question is answered in the affirmative. 2. This intra court appeal is directed against an order of a learned Single Judge dated 11.02.2015 made in Writ Petition No.68108 of 2010. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the appellant s writ petition as devoid of merit. In the writ petition, the appellant had challenged the order dated 19.05.2010 passed...
Rajesh @ Rajender Kohar Vs. State of Karnataka, Amruth halli Police, B ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
(Prayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C praying to set aside the judgment dated 5.3.2011 in S.C.No.844/2009 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court No.13, Bangalore City, convicting the appellant/accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC. The appellant/accused is sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to pay fine, he shall undergo R.I. for 6 months for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and the appellant/accused is sentenced to undergo S.I. for 1 year and pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to pay fine, he shall undergo S.I. for 3 months for the offence punishable under Section 201 of IPC.) Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. 1. The judgment and order of conviction dated 5.3.2011 passed by the XIII Fast Track Court, Bangalore City in S.C.No.844/2009 is called in question in this appeal by the convicted accused. 2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that, the deceased, accused,...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »