Karnataka Court November 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt Arathy, Vs. S M Umesha,
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-09-2015
M.F.A.No.7025/2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF NOVEMBER2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7025/2011(MV) R BETWEEN:1. SMT ARATHY, W/O LATE UMESHA AGED ABOUT25YEARS SMT. MANGALAMMA, W/O RAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT52YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF KENGAR KOPPALU, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY R/AT VARAGARAHALLY MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT ...APPELLANTS2 2. (BY SMT.BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. S.M.UMESHA, S/O MUTHAIAH AGED ABOUT43YEARS R/AT SHANKARPURA VILLAGE MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 401 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE-2, NO.2903/1, 1ST FLOOR MUSLIM HOSTEL COMPLEX SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSORE-570 009 REP. BY THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.S.UMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH V/O. DTD:09. 02.2015) THIS MFA FILED U/S1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18.11.2010 PASSED IN MVC NO.142/2008 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.)...
Madhu Sharma Vs. R.L. Vasudev Rao and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-05-2015
(Prayer: Crl. A. filed U/S. 378(4) Cr.P.C by the Advocate for the appellant praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated: 27.5.2015, passed by the VI Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, in C.C. No. 7981/2007 “ acquitting the respondent/accused for the offence P/U/S 500 and 501 of IPC.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The matter is at the state of admission. 2. Appellant herein was the complainant before the VI Additional ACMM, Bengaluru, on a private complaint filed under Section 2(d), Cr.P.C. The main complaint before the trial court was that the 1st respondent is an editor and publisher of a monthly newspaper run under the name and style VANASUMA. The 2nd respondent is the printer of the said monthly newspaper. 3. A publication was made in the newspaper- VANASUMA on 25.7.2006 making serious allegations against the appellant herein, alleging that she had amassed crores of rupees by way of bribe, being the executive directo...
Centum Electronics Limited Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-05-2015
(Prayer: Revisions are filed under S. 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 praying to set aside the order of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore dated 13.08.2013 in STA 89 to 135/2012, etc.,) Vineet Saran, J. These are forty seven revision petitions filed by the assessee against the order of the Tribunal dated 13.08.2013, whereby the orders of the first appellate authority, as well as the Assessing Authority, have been confirmed. The brief facts of this case are that the petitioner is a company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of Hybrid Micro Circuitsand is a dealer registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act for short) and Central Sales Tax, 1956 (CST Act for short). Under the Information Technology Policy of the State Government, two notifications were issued, both dated 21.08.1997 “ one under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (KST Act for short) and the other under the CST Act. Under the policy of the State Government, ...
Centum Electronics Limited Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 5th day of November, 2015 Present THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VINEET SARAN & THE HONBLE MRS JUSTICE S SUJATHA S T R Ps 56 / 2014 & 279 324 / 2014 Between Centum Electronics Limited (Earlier Solectron Centum Electronics Ltd) # 44, KHB Industrial Area Yelahanka New Town Bangalore 560 064 By its Company Secy. Sri Ramu Akkili Petitioner (By Sri K P Kumar, Sr. Counsel a/w Sri V S Arbatti, Adv.) And State of Karnataka by its Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit57) DVO5 Abhaya Complex II Floor, Platform Road Seshadripuram, Bangalore 20 (By Sri K M Shivayogiswamy, AGA) Revisions are filed under S.65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 praying to set aside the order of Respondent 2 the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore dated 13.8.2013 in STA89to 135/2012, etc. Saran J., delivered the following: Revisions coming on for hearing this day, Vineet JUDGMENT These are forty seven revision petitions filed by the asses...
Mrs Madhu Sharma Vs. R L Vasudev Rao
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-05-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE5h DAY OF NOVEMBER2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRL. APPEAL No.717/2015 BETWEEN: MRS MADHU SHARMA CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, IN WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 7TH FLOOR, KHB BUILDING, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560 009. PRESENTLY ADDTIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, WORKING AS SECREATARY, KARNATAKA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, 3RD FLOOR, M S BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-01. ... APPELLANT (By Sri: BALAKRISHNA M R, ADV.) AND1 R L VASUDEV RAO FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, MAJOR IN AGE, CHIEF EDITOR AND PUBLISHER, 2 VANASUMA, PUBLICATION OF VOICE OF MINORITIES, I CROSS, SUBHASHNAGAR, MANDYA.2. M S SHIVA PRAKASH, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, MAJOR IN AGE, PRINTER, PROPRIETOR, IDEAL PRINTERS, MANDYA-571401. (By Sri: S GURU PRASANNA, ADV. FOR R1-R2) ... RESPONDENTS CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C BY THE ADV., FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DAT...
Rajeshwari G. Bhuyar and Others Vs. Sindhu Travels, Koramangala, Banga ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-04-2015
(Prayer: This MFA is filed u/s. 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and award dated 06/11/2013, passed in MVC No.2553/2012 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore (SCCH-18), partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) N.K. Patil, J. 1. This appeal by the claimants is directed against the impugned judgment and award dated 6th November 2013, passed in MVC No.2553/2012, by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (SCCH-18), (hereinafter referred to as Tribunalfor short) seeking to enhance the compensation. 2. The Tribunal by its judgment and award has awarded compensation of Rs.87,37,145/- under different heads with interest at 8% per annum from the date of petition till the date of realization on account of death of the deceased-Annappa Mallappa Hipparagi in the road traffic accident. 3. In brief, the facts of the case a...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. S.N. Someshekar and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-04-2015
(Prayer: This MFA filed u/s. 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated 15.09.2010 passed in MVC No. 1030/2009 on the file of the presiding officer, Fast Track Court-I, member Additional MACT, Mysore, awarding a compensation of Rs.1,85,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization.) H.G. Ramesh, J. (Ora): 1. This appeal is by an Insurer and is directed against the judgment and award dated 15.09.2010 passed in MVC No. 1030/2009. 2. I have heard learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and the respondents. By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has awarded a compensation of Rs.1,85,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. to the claimant for the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 18.06.2009 due to rash and negligent driving of the auto-rickshaw cab bearing No.KA-09-A-9251 in which he was travelling. The Tribunal has made the owner, Insurer and driver jointly and severally liable for the award. The Tribunal has directed the...
Mrs. Rajeshwari G Bhuyar Vs. Sindhu Travels
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-04-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF NOVEMBER2015PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR M.F.A. No.1332 of 2014(MV) Between:1. Mrs. Rajeshwari G. Bhuyar, 2. W/o. Late Annappa Mallappa Hipparagi, Aged about 40 years. Baby Apeksha .A D/o. Late Annappa Mallappa Hipparagi, Aged about 15 years, Rep. by her natural Guardian her Mother Appellant No.1. Both are Residing At Flat No.305, Ashoka Windows, 5th Main, Malleshpalya, Bangalore 75.3. Mr. Mallappa Annappa Hipparagi, S/o. Late Annappa Hipparagi, Aged about 80 years.4. Smt. Kasturi, W/o. Mallappa Annappa Hipparagi, Aged about 71 years. Appellant Nos. 3 & 4 are Residing at No.46, Sangameshwari Nagar, APMC Road, Belgaum. Presently Residing at Flat No.305, Ashoka Windows, 2 5th Main, Malleshpalya, Bangalore 75. ... Appellants (By Shri. R. Vijaya Kumar, Advocate) And:1. Sindhu Travels, Devabhaktuni Sridevi, No.513, 8th Block, Opp. Post Office, Koramangala, B...
United India Insurance Co Ltd Vs. S N Somashekar S/O G R Narayanasetty
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-04-2015
-1- M.F.A.No.2/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF NOVEMBER2015BEFORE R THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2/2011 (MV) BETWEEN: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. DIVISIONAL OFFICE -II SUNDER ARCADE B N ROAD OPP SUBURB BUS STAND, MYSORE BY REGIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. SHANKARANARAYANA BUIDLING M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE560001 BY ITS MANAGER ... APPELLANT (BY SRI O.MAHESH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. S.N.SOMASHEKAR S/O G.R.NARAYANASETTY AGED ABOUT25YEARS R/AT NEW BADAVANE SIDDALINGAPURA VILLAGE AND POST, MYSORE TALUK SMT PADMA W/O NARAYANASETTY AGED ABOUT51YEARS R/AT NO.57/3 HOSA BEEDI SIDDALINGAPURA VILLAGE AND POST MYSORE TALUK2 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI O.SHIVARAMA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI SHREENIDHI L FOR SRI RAJASHEKAR S ADVOCATES FOR R2) -2- M.F.A.No.2/2011 THIS MFA FILED U/S1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:15. 09.2010 PASSED IN MVC NO.1030/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COU...
E. Veenakumari Vs. T.R. Srinivas
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2015
(Prayer: This CP is filed under Section 24 of CPC, praying to transfer the case bearing MC No.2306/2012, titled as srinivasa T R V/S smt E Veena Kumari from the court of Hon'ble III Additional Principal Family Court Judge, Bangalore to the Senior Civil Judge AT Chitradurga.) 1. The respondent-husband filed the petition under Section 13(1)(1a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of marriage in the Family Court at Bengaluru in the year 2012. The present petition is filed in the year 2014 seeking its transfer to the Court at Chitradurga. 2. The primary contention of the petitioner is that she being unemployed does not have resources to attend the Court at Bengaluru. Hence, she pleads that a sum of Rs.1,000/- be paid to her on every date of appearance. The petitioner further submits that the respondent is a Sub Inspector of Police by profession. 3. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent submits that paying the amount of Rs.1,000/- to the petitioner on every d...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »