Karnataka Court November 2015 Judgments
Mr M Pitchaiah Vs. Mr K S Periyaswamy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-26-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.718/2015 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7836/2013 CRL. P. NO.718/2015 BETWEEN:1. MR M PITCHAIAH S/O K. MUTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT60YEARS, EX-DIRECTOR (FINANCE), M/S BEML LIMITED, NO.23/1, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SAMPANGI RAM NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 027.2.3. MR. P.R. NAIK S/O RAMAKRISHNA ANANT NAIK, AGED ABOUT57YEARS, DIRECTOR (DEFENSE BUSINESS) M/S BEML LIMITED, No.23/1, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SAMPANGI RAM NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 027. MRS. REKHA BHRGAVA W/O SHRI PRADIP BHARGAVA, AGED ABOUT61YEARS, DIRECTOR (NON-OFFICIAL INDEPENDENT), M/S BEML LIMITED, NO.23/1, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SAMPANGI RAM NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 027. 2 MR. NOBLE THAMBURAJ S/O LATE COL.A.C. THAMBURAJ, AGED ABOUT61YEARS, DIRECTOR (NON-OFFICIAL INDEPENDENT), M/S BEML LIMITED, No.23/1, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SAMPANGI RAM NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 027. MR. KANWAL NATH S/O DHARAM NATH ENDLAW, AGED ABOUT61YEARS, DIRECTOR (NOR...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rathna and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: This MFA filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act against the Judgment and award dated 22.02.2011 passed in MVC No. 1255/2009 on the file of the XIII Additional Small Causes Judge, Member, MACT., Court of Small Causes, Bangalore, awarding a compensation of Rs.60,500/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till deposit in the tribunal.) Oral Judgment: (H.G. Ramesh, J.) 1. Whether police charge sheet could be relied upon to hold that the driver of the Insured vehicle had not driving license as on the date of accident? This is the question that arises for determination in this appeal and it is answered in the negative. 2. This appeal is by an Insurance Company. By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has awarded a compensation of Rs.60,500/- with interest thereon at 6% p.a. to the claimant for the injuries suffered by her in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 31.01.2009 due to negligent driving of the rider of the motor cycle bearing No. KA-03-...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Manipal Media Network Limited Udupi District, Udupi represented b ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(These STRPs are filed under Section 23(1) of KST Act, against the judgment and order dated 16.12.2011 passed in STA.78 to 80/2010 on the file of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal Bangaluru, dismissing the appeals.) Vineet Saran, J. The assessee has filed these petitions relating to the assessment years 2002-03, 2004-05 and 2004-05, challenging the order of the Tribnal, whereby the appeals of the assessee have been dismissed. 2. In short, the facts of this case are that the assessee is in the business of publication of newspaper for which newsprint is used, which is admittedly goods', which is taxable under the Sales Tax Act, even though the newspaper is exempted from such tax. The dispute in the present case is with regard to stock transfer of newsprint from Manipal to Mumbai, which the petitioner-assessee claims was for printing of its newspaper in Mumbai and was transferred from its office in Manipal to its own office in Mumbai. However, it is not disputed that though the newsprint w...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Manipal Media Network Limited Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF NOVEMBER2015PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA STRP Nos.325/2014 & 65-66/2015 BETWEEN M/S MANIPAL MEDIA NETWORK LIMITED UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI P VAMAN MALLYA S/O P SHESHGIRI MALLYA AGED ABOUT69YEARS. PETITIONER (BY SMT H VANI, ADV.) AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BY ITS SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 (BY SRI T.K. VEDAMURTHY, HCGP) RESPONDENT2THESE STRPs ARE FILED KARNATAKA UNDER SECTION.23(1) OF KST ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED:16.12.2011 PASSED IN STA.78 TO802010 ON THE FILE OF THE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEALS. FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONS COMING ON APPELLATE THESE The assessee has filed these petitions relating to ORDER the assessment years 2002-03, 2004-05 and 2004- 05, challenging the order of the Tribunal, whe...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Vs. Smt Rathna
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
- 1 - M.F.A.No.9308/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF NOVEMBER2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.9308/2011 (MV) R BETWEEN: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. DIVISIONAL OFFICE, BANGALORE THROUGH ITS REGIONAL OFFICE5H & 6TH FLOORS, KRISHIBHAVAN HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001 REP. BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER APPELLANT (BY SRI JANARDHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT. RATHNA, W/O SRI SHEKAR AGED ABOUT41YEARS, R/A No.47 DWARAKNAGAR, IAF POST, BANGALORE2 SRI RASUL SAHIB DADED S/O LATE BASHA SAHEB DADED No.97, SYED BLOCK, ANNASANDRAPALYA BANGALORE, (OWNER OF THE MOTORCYCLE BEARING KA-03-EC-6410) RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHRIPAD V. SHASTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI SATHISHA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS MFA FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED2202.2011 PASSED IN MVC NO.1255/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT., COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BANGALORE, AWARDI...
Tag this Judgment!Mahadevappa and Others Vs. Uday Kumar and Another
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
(Prayer: This RSA is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2010 passed in R.A. No. 66/2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Yadgir, dismissing the Appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2009 passed in O.S. No. 53/2000 on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) at Yadgir.) 1. These two second appeals were brought under Section 100 CPC from a common judgment and separate decree (s) passed by the Senior Civil Judge at Yadgir, whereby the dismissal of suit for declaration and mandatory injunction and for restoration of the property to the plaintiff was maintained and the decree for permanent injunction passed in favour of defendant No. 1 was confirmed. 2. Defendant No. 2 “ Mr. Mathew, was the owner of plot No. 2, in land bearing Sy.No. 150/1 of Yadgir (B). He entered into an agreement of sale dated 23.07.1998 in favour of the plaintiff “ Mahadevappa. Sale deed of the property was executed and registered on 25.04.2000....
Tag this Judgment!B.S. Yeddyurappa, Chief Minister of Karnataka, Vidhana Soudha, Bengalu ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed praying to quash the impugned sanction order dated 21.1.2011 issued by His Excellency the Governor of Karnataka, according sanction to prosecute the petitioner, vide Annexure “ A, and to declare the same invalid and unenforceable in law, etc.) 1. We are invited to decide in this batch of writ petitions, the legality of the sanction order dated January 21, 2011 issued by His Excellency the Governor of Karnataka. By the order impugned before us, His Excellency, on the petition filed by the complainants, namely, Sirajin Basha and K.N. Balaraj, accorded sanction under sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and under Section 197 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to prosecute the petitioner for the alleged offence under Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code, and Section 13(1)(d) and Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The former Chief Minister is the writ petitioner before this court. 2. The releva...
Tag this Judgment!Mahadevappa S/O Nagappa Since Deceased Through Ors Vs. Udaykumar S/O B ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.7512/2010 C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.7511/2010 IN RSA NO.7512/2010 BETWEEN: MAHADEVAPPA S/O NAGAPPA SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRs 1.2.3. NINGAMMA W/O MAHADEVAPPA AGE:60. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O YADGIR DURGAMMA W/O GUNJALAPPA AGE:46. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O YADGIR NINGAPPA S/O MAHADEVAPPA AGE:40. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O YADGIR (BY SRI ASHOK S. KINAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: UDAY KUMAR S/O BHEEMSHAPPA DODDAMANI ... APPELLANTS2AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O YADGIR ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI AMEET KUMAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION100OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED0110.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.66/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT YADGIR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED1210.2009 PASSED IN O.S. NO.53/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AT Y...
Tag this Judgment!The Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. M/S Rittal India Pvt Ltd.,
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA ITA NO.268/2014 BETWEEN:1. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LTU, JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGE, BANGALORE. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (LTU), JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGE, BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) AND: M/S. RITTAL INDIA PVT. LTD., NO.23 & 24, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, VEERAPURA, DODDABALLAPUR-561 203 (BY SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,) RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION260 OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED2801.2014 PASSED IN ITA NO.278/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR200809 PRAYING TO I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW II) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.278/BANG/2013 DATED2801.2014 AND CONFIRM APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU...
Tag this Judgment!Appasab Vs. The Asst. Executive Engineer, Karanja Project
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
1. The Petitioner is before this Court assailing the Award dated 2.11.2009 passed in Reference No.270/2004. 2. The Petitioner had raised a dispute alleging that he was illegally terminated from the service of the Respondents on 22.4.1982 though he was appointed as Literate Mazdoor on 7.4.1979. The Respondents had appeared and disputed the claim of the Petitioner. The Labour Court on taking note of the evidence tendered by the Workman as WW1 and the documents relied upon as Exs. W1 to W3 and also evidence tendered on behalf of the Respondents as MW1 and the documents at Exs. M1 to M37 has arrived at a conclusion that case as put forth by the Petitioner cannot be accepted as such, the Reference has been rejected. 3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner, while assailing the Award passed has referred to the documents relied on and also finding rendered by the Labour Court. In that light, it is contended that the documents available on record has not been properly appreciated by the Labou...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »