Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 RSA No.1353/2008 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JUNE2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA BETWEEN: RSA No.1353/2008 (RES) 1.2. 3.4.5. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT. THE DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS DEPT. NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, BAGALKOT. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, JAMKHANDI. THE HEAD MASTER, GOVERNMENT KANNADA MEDIUM GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, BANAHATTI, TQ.JAMKHANDI. (BY SRI.H.HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, GOVT.ADVOCATE) APPELLANTS AND:1. KUMARI SHILPA SHRISHAIL BARAGADAGI, AGE:22. YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O BANAHATTI, TQ.JAMKHANDI. 2 RSA No.1353/2008 2. THE PRINCIPAL (HIGH SCHOOL SECTION), S.R.A. HIGH SCHOOL, BANAHATTI, TQ.JAMKHANDI. (R1 AND R2 SERVED) RESPONDENTS THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION100OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED0612.2007 PASSED IN R.A.NO.68/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), JAMKHANDI DISMISSING ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
(Prayer: This Appeal Is Filed Under Section 100 Of Cpc Against The Judgment And Decree Dated 05.12.2007 Passed In R.A.No.68/2007 On The File Of The Prl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Jamkhandi Dismissing The Appeal And Confirming The Judgment And Decree Dated 21.07.2007 Passed In O.S.No.48/2007 On The File Of The Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Banahatti, Partly Decreeing The Suit Filed For Declaration And Mandatory Injunction) 1. Heard the learned Government Advocate who appears for the appellants. Respondent No.1 served and unrepresented. Respondent No.2 are the school authorities. The present appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC challenging the concurrent findings granted against the defendants in O.S.No.48/2007, which was pending on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Banahatti and the affirmation of the same by the first appellate Court in R.A.No.68/2007. Appellants are defendants No.l to 5 in the said suit. respondent No. 1 is the plaintiff in the said suit. Respondent No.2 is defendant No.6...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Crl.P718013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. PACHHAPURE CRIMINAL PETITION No.7180 OF2013BETWEEN: Dr.S. Krishnamurthy, IPS (Retd.), No.71, N.N. Farms, Sanjayanagar, Bengaluru 560 094. [Dr.S. Krishnamurthy - Party-in-Person]. AND:1. State of Karnataka ... PETITIONER/S By Lokayuktha Police, City Division, Bengaluru - 560 001.2. Sri. C. Dinakar, IPS (Retd.), No.380, 100 ft Road, HAL II stage, Indiranagar, Bengaluru - 560 008. ... RESPONDENT/S [By Sri. Bahubali Danawade, Spl.PP for R1. Sri. C. Dinakar - Party-in-person, for R2.]. *** 2 Crl.P718013 This Crl.P. is filed u/Section 482 Cr.P.C praying to quash the FIR No.95/2012 dated:27. 12.2012 and the Order dated 05.11.2013 in Cr. No.95/2012 pending on the file of the XXIII Addl. City Civil and S.J., Bangalore. This Crl.P. having been heard and reserved for Orders, this day the Court pronounced the following: Date of Reserving the Order :09. 06.2014 Date o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Crl.P. is filed u/Section 482 Cr.P.C praying to quash the FIR No.95/2012 dated: 27.12.2012 and the Order dated 05.11,2613 in Cr. No.95/2012 pending on the file of the XXIII Addl. City Civil and S.D., Bangalore.) 1. The petitioner has challenged the Order dated 05.11.2013 passed by the learned Special Judge, taking cognizance for the offence punishable under Sections 13(1)(c)(d)(ii) r/w. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short] against him and for quashing the FIR in Crime No.95/2012 dated 27c12.2012. 2. The facts relevant for the purpose of this petition are as under: The petitioner is a retired civil servant in the Indian Police Service, Karnataka Cadre and retired on 30.04.2003. The 2rd respondent, who is also a retired civil servant in the Indian Police Service, Karnataka Cadre filed a complaint to the Station House Officer/Officer-in-charge-Lokayukta Police Station against the petitioner for the offence under Sections ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JUNE2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA W.P.Nos.13428-13429/2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN :1. SRI BHAGYA CHANDRA RAO, S/O SRI PRABHAKAR S. RAO, AGED ABOUT58YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S KENNAMETAL INDIA LTD., 8/9TH MILE,TUMKUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 073.2. SRI D.SARATHY, S/O SRI P .K.DEVANATHAN, AGED ABOUT57YEARS, VICE PRESIDENT M/S KENNAMETAL INDIA LTD. 8/9TH MILE, TUMKUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 073 (BY SRI DIWAKARA K, ADV.,) AND : STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY JOINT DIRECTOR OF FACTORIES (MEDICAL), BANGALORE, 2ND FLOOR, KARMIKARA BHAVANA, NEAR DAIRY CIRCLE,, BANNERUGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 029 (AN INSPECTOR APPOINTED UNDER SECTION81) OF THE FACTORIES ACT). ... PETITIONERS ... RESPONDENT - 2 - THESE WPs ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION482OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS AND PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF C.C. No.1350/2013 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED VII ADD...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 W.P.No..27999/14 c/w W.P.No.28217/13 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27999/2014 c/w W.P.No.28217/2013 (GM-KEB) PETITIONER (COMMON) BETWEEN: GULBARGA ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MAIN ROAD, GULBARGA 585102, REP. HEREIN BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. (BY SRI S.SRIRANGA, ADV.) AND: IN W.P.No.27999/2014:1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. HEREIN BY MINISTRY OF POWER, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI 1, REP. HEREIN BY ITS SECRETARY.2. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY, A TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT2003 7TH FLOOR, CORE4 SCOPE COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 110003, REP. HEREIN BY ITS SECRETARY.3.4. 2 W.P.No..27999/14 c/w W.P.No.28217/13 KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, 6TH & 7TH FLOOR, 6TH FLOOR, MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS, M.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 56000...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These WPs Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India R/W Section 482 Of Cr.P.C Praying To Call For The Entire Records And Proceedings In Respect Of C.C. No. 1350/2013 Pending On The File Of The Learned Vu Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore Against The Petitioners And After Perusal Of The Same, Quash And Set Aside The Complaint Dated 23.01.2013 Filed By The Respondent And The Order Dated 23.01.2013 Directing Issuance Of The Process By Way Of Summons For The Offence Punishable Under Section 92 Of The Factories Act, 1948 In C.C. No. 10784/2013 To The Petitioners Vide Ann-A and B Respectively Pending On The File Of The Learned Vii, Addl, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore Vide Ann-A Against The Petitioner.) 1. Accused Nos. 1 and 2 in C.C. No. 1350/2013 pending on the file of VII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, nave come up in these petitions seeking to quash the order dated 23.01.2013, wherein the learned Magistrate while ta...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals Are Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition Nos.54865-867/2013 Dated 22/05/2014.) D.H. Waghela, C.J. Oral Order: 1. These appeals are preferred by the State from the common interim order made in number of petitions by learned single Judge on 22.05.2014. It is clear from the bare reading of the impugned order that the main original writ petitions and connected matters were to be heard on merits in June 2014, but during summer vacation, the authorities had issued notices and precipitated the matter, which required learned single Judge to make an interim order. The original petitioners, the respondents herein, are owners of sugar factories and there is no dispute about the fact that the fair remunerative price (FRP) for sugarcane is prescribed by the Central Government which is the minimum which a farmer is entitled to receive for the sugarcane supplied by him. There is also no dispute about the fac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Gulbarga
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of prohibition, prohibiting the respondents No.2 to 4 from illegally demolishing the properties bearing Municipal No.30-338, 30-339, situated at Court Road, Biradar Colony, Basavakalyan which are owed by the petitioner No.1 and 2 respectively, without adopting the due process of law.) 1. It is submitted at the Bar that in similar matters wherein action of respondents 2 to 4 in illegally attempting to demolish the properties situated in Court Road, Basavakalyan had been challenged, this Court has permitted the petitioners therein to file objections along with relevant documents before the 4th respondent - Commissioner, City Municipal Council, Basavakalyan within two weeks and appear before him on a particular date and that the Commissioner shall hear the petitioners therein and consider their objections and thereafter, pass a conside...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Direct The Respondent To Consider The Representation Dated 4th Mar 2014, At Annexure- C, Given By The Petitioner To The Respondent To Allot House Bearing No. Lig 34, Located In Khb Colony, Habbuwada, Karwar, To The Petitioner.) 1. Petitioner claims to be an occupant of house bearing No.LIG 34, KHB Colony, Habbuwada, Karwar. His grievance in this writ petition is, that a representation submitted on 04.03.2014 vide Annexure - C, has not been considered. The petitioner alleges arbitrariness on account of inaction. 2. Shri P.V.Gunjal, learned Advocate placed reliance an order dated 21.08.2013 passed in W.P. Nos.80083-87/2013 and connected cases and submitted, that this petition may be disposed of accordingly. 3. Smt, Sharmiia M. Patil, learned advocate for the respondent submitted that in case a decision has not been taken on the representation submitted by the petitioner, seeking allotm...
Tag this Judgment!