Skip to content


Bhimrao Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Karnataka Gulbarga High Court

Decided On

Case Number

WP.No.83674 of 2011 (GM-CPC)

Judge

Appellant

Bhimrao

Respondent

Special Land Acquisition Officer and Another

Excerpt:


.....the matter taking note of the memo of calculation filed by the slao, the memo of calculation filed by the petitioners and the revised memo of wp.83674/2011 calculation to be filed by the claimants. memos of calculation filed before this court along with this order shall be transmitted to the executing court by keeping the xerox copies of the memos in the file of this case. 8. the executing court is directed to pass an order after hearing both parties and record its findings regarding the actual amount due and payable by the slao to the claimants and thereafter, proceed in the execution proceedings in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. the claimants shall be immediately paid the admitted amount of rs.3,98,750/-. the claimants are permitted to file a revised memo of calculation reflecting the amount due as of now before the executing court. this petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Judgment:


(Prayer: This Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari, quashing the order of I Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) at Gulbarga dated 27.11.2010 in Execution Petition No.60/2002 vide Annexure-K consequently accept the Memo of Calculation filed by the petitioners dated 10.11.2010 vide Annexure-F and etc.)

1. Order passed by the Executing Court on 27.11.2010 on the Memo of Calculation filed by the decree holders - petitioners herein is called in question in this writ petition.

2. The land of the petitioners having been acquired, an award was passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (for short, 'the SLAO'). On reference, the Civil Court has enhanced the compensation as per the judgment and award passed in LAC No.591/1994, as modified in M.F.A.No.1402/1997 and the Cross Objection filed by the claimants. Petitioners filed Execution Petition in EP.No.60/2002. They calculated the WP.83674/2011 market value and the compensation payable as enhanced along with interest on the solatium and additional amount payable apart from interest on the market value. The Executing Court considering the objections filed by the SLAO has found that as per the decision of the Apex Court in the case of GURPREET SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA - 2006 (8) SCC 457 the claimants were entitled for interest on solatium and additional market value only from 19.09.2001. Thereafter, it has proceeded to record a finding that the claimant - decree holders had wrongly calculated interest on solatium and additional market value for the period prior to 19.09.2001 and therefore, the Memo of Calculation was not sustainable in law.

3. A careful perusal of the order under challenge discloses that the judgment debtors also did not file any Memo of Calculation. The Executing Court, without finding out the actual amount due and payable by the SLAO and merely on the ground that the claimant - decree holders had claimed interest for the period prior to 19.09.2001 which was contrary to the judgment of the Apex Court referred to supra, dismissed the Memo of Calculation filed and proceeded to close the execution proceedings. This approach of the Executing Court is clearly erroneous, inasmuch as no attempt has been made to find out WP.83674/2011 the actual amount due and payable by the SLAO to the petitioners, whose land has been acquired.

4. It is for this reason, this Court directed the learned Government Advocate and the respondent - SLAO, M.I.P., Gulbarga to file a Memo of Calculation. Pursuant to the same, a Memo of Calculation dated 17.01.2013 has been filed. In the said memo, it is stated that as on 26.11.2010, the actual amount to be paid to the claimants is Rs.3,98,750/-, but excess amount of Rs.7,84,339/- has been deposited in E.P.No.60/2002 under protest.

5. It is not necessary for this Court to examine the actual amount due and payable as per the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Court as modified by this Court. The said exercise has to be undertaken by the Executing Court. It has failed to undertake such an exercise.

6. However, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners, admittedly a sum of Rs.3,98,750/- is the amount to be paid even as per the calculation of the respondent.

7. The Executing Court has to examine the matter taking note of the Memo of Calculation filed by the SLAO, the Memo of Calculation filed by the petitioners and the revised Memo of WP.83674/2011 Calculation to be filed by the claimants. Memos of Calculation filed before this Court along with this order shall be transmitted to the Executing Court by keeping the xerox copies of the memos in the file of this case.

8. The Executing Court is directed to pass an order after hearing both parties and record its findings regarding the actual amount due and payable by the SLAO to the claimants and thereafter, proceed in the execution proceedings in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. The claimants shall be immediately paid the admitted amount of Rs.3,98,750/-. The claimants are permitted to file a revised Memo of Calculation reflecting the amount due as of now before the Executing Court. This petition stands disposed of accordingly.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //