Karnataka Court July 2010 Judgments

Ashish ShakyA. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Karnataka

1. The first bail application was rejected on 7.11.2008 by Hon. S. S. Chauhan, J. The notice was served on the 2nd bail application No.6132 dated 19.2.2009 on the same day to office of Government and on 5.3.2009 the order was passed to list with previous paper in the next cause list before the appropriate Bench. Thereafter, another 2nd bail application No.19445 of 2009 dated 13.7.2009 was filed in which on the same day notice was given to the office of Government. On that application on 28.7.2009 the order was passed to list before the appropriate Bench with previous paper. 2. List revised. No one is present on behalf of applicant to press this second bail application.3. Both the bail applications are being heard and decided by common order.4. In the 2nd bail application, which was filed in February, 2009 the affidavit was sworn by one Sunil Kumar brother-in-law of the applicant and again 2nd bail application was filed in the month of July, 2009, the affidavit was sworn by one Ved Prak...

Wing Commander Sanjay Kumar Gaur and Another. Vs. State of U.P. and Ot ...

Court: Karnataka

1. Heard learned counsel for parties and perused the pleadings. It appears that a Housing Scheme, known as 'Vyom Khand Yojna', Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, was cancelled on account of a Public Interest Litigation as the area was alleged to be falling in a green belt. Accordingly, the scheme was cancelled and the applicants were refunded the deposits with interest. The petitioner is one of such applicants who has prayed for issuance of (i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the resolution/decisions of the LDA board dated 13.08.2009 as far as it is related to concellation of allotment of plot of petitioner by summoning the same from opposite parties;(ii) a writ order direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to revive the Vyom Khand Yojna and to execute the sale deed/registry in favour of the petitioners' for their respective plots allotted in the year 2005 as per the condition of the brochure and as soon as possible or within stipulate...

Mrs. Ayeesha Shareef Vs. State by Lokayuktha Police

Court: Karnataka

ORDER 1.By order dated 14,01.2010, this Court in Crl.R.P.No.961/09 c/w 962/09, directed the respondent-Lokayukta to consider the documents that would be produced by the petitioners and to verify as to whether these documents support the claim of the petitioners and to pass appropriate orders regarding interim custody of the property of the petitioners.2.As per the submission made by the petitioners Counsel, no such order has been passed and the authorities are stating that investigation is pending.3. It is seen that some of the documents and material objects are necessarily needed immediately for the purpose of the petitioners' business transaction. Therefore, on such satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, he could have delivered them back pending enquiry, as there is a direction by this Court to do the needful within one month.4. As the documents and other material objects are required for the day today transaction pending enquiry after conducting mahazar if need be and also obtai...

Chikkanna Since Deceased by Lrs. and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Re ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2010KAR3901.

1. In these writ appeals, order dated 10.03.2000 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants herein is challenged. In the writ petition, the appellants herein had challenged the order dated 19 05.2007 passed by the Land Tribunal, Srirangapatna. In so far as it related to the grant of occupancy rights in favour of respondent Nos.3 to 9 herein.2. The dispute relates to Sy.Nos.204. 118 & 126 of Channahalli village of .Srirangapatna Taluk. Deceased Chikkanna and Chamegowda, both sons of Rajegowda filed applications in Form No.7 claiming occupancy rights as tenants in respect of these lands. Writ petitioners/appellants herein are the legal representatives of the said Chikkanna and Chamegowda. The Tribunal granted occupancy rights in respect of 1 acre 34 guntas in Sy.No.104 and 26 guntas in Sy.No. 104/2 to the petitioners. Different portions of lands comprised in these three survey numbers were granted in favour of the predecessors-in-title of priv...

Javaraiah, Since Deceased by His L.Rs. and Others Vs. Umesha and Anoth ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2010KAR3625

1. The appellants, who are the legal representatives of the 1st defendant, call in question legality of the judgment rendered by the Civil Judge(Sr.Dn.}, Bhadravathi allowing the appeal filed by the 1st respondent - plaintiff and remanding the suit to the trial court for disposal.2. Background facts in nutshell are 3S follows: The appellant - Javaraiah, preferred an application under Section 22 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 ('Act' for short) against the 1st respondent - B. Umesh, claiming compensation for the employment injuries sustained by him while working at the sugarcane crusher unit run by the 1sl respondent. The Commissioner for Workmen Compensation ('Commissioner' for short) passed an award entitling Javaraiah to receive compensation amount of Rs.92,085/- with interest at 6% p.a and also Rs. 1,500/- as penalty. The 1st respondent - B. Umesh was ordered to pay the amount within 30 days of the award dated 27.07.1996. The 1st respondent filed a Misc.Petition before the Commi...