Karnataka Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri. Ramesh B Vijapure S/O Shi Balakrishna Vijapure vs the State of K ...
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SHRI. RAMESH B VIJAPURE S/O SHI BALAKRISHNA VIJAPURE AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is also absent. This shows that, the Complainant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Cha...
Tippanna S Aladakati vs Marthandappa S/O Mallalla Goudar
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102510 OF 2015 (MV-I) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102511 OF 2015IN M.F.A.NO.102510/2015 AGED MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, TALUK: HAVERI, DISTRICT: HAVERI, BEARING REG. NO.KA 27/K-5018) GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI 1. MARTHANDAPPA S/O. MALLALLA GOUDAR, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD -2- MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 15/11/2012 IN M.V.C.NO.546/2009 PASSED BY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT, RANEBENNUR BY FIXING THE LIABILITY ON 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. IN M.F.A.NO.102511/2015 AGED 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, TALUK: HAVERI, DISTRICT: HAVERI. BEARING REG.NO.KA 27/K-5018)1. SRI. NAGARAJ S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA GOUDAR @ KIVUDANAVAR, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTUR...
Tippanna S Aladakati vs Nagaraj S/O Hanumanthappa Goudar
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102510 OF 2015 (MV-I) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102511 OF 2015IN M.F.A.NO.102510/2015 AGED MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, TALUK: HAVERI, DISTRICT: HAVERI, BEARING REG. NO.KA 27/K-5018) GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI 1. MARTHANDAPPA S/O. MALLALLA GOUDAR, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD -2- MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 15/11/2012 IN M.V.C.NO.546/2009 PASSED BY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT, RANEBENNUR BY FIXING THE LIABILITY ON 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. IN M.F.A.NO.102511/2015 AGED 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, TALUK: HAVERI, DISTRICT: HAVERI. BEARING REG.NO.KA 27/K-5018)1. SRI. NAGARAJ S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA GOUDAR @ KIVUDANAVAR, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTUR...
Vikramraj S/O Annasaheb Naik vs Manjula W/O Appasaheb Naik
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 103559 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VIKRAMRAJ S/O. ANNASAHEB NAIK @ MUNJANAVAR, AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOSPET GALLI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEEN P.MOREY, ADVOCATE) AND: MANJULA W/O. APPASAHEB NAIK AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HIRUR, TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591117. RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.L.VANTI, ADVOCATE)CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN Location: High Court of THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.29 11:19:41 +0530 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOKAK IN O.S.NO.436/2020 ON I.A.NO.5 DATED 24/06/2022 AT VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS...
Vikramraj S/O Annasaheb Naik vs Kanyakumari W/O Manjunath Naikar
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 103561 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VIKRAMRAJ S/O. ANNASAHEB NAIK @ MUNJANAVAR, AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOSPET GALLLI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEEN P.MOREY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. KANYAKUMARI W/O. MANJUNATH NAIKAR, AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRICULTURE2. MANJULA W/O. APPASAHEB NAIK, CHANDRASHEKAR AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, LAXMAN Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.29 11:19:41 +0530 RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANAND ASTEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. M.L.VANTI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOKAK IN O.S. NO. 415/2020 ON I.A. NO.7 DATED 07/07/2022 AT VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY...
The Executive Engineer (Ele) vs Shri Shrinivas S/O Shripadrao Kulkarni
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) AND ANOTHER VS. SHRI SHRINIVAS S/O SHRIPADRAO KULKARNI] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is also absent. This shows that, the Appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of ...
Sri. Akbar S/O. Maheboobgani Bilekudri vs Sri Dr. K.G.Chandrashekhara
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SRI. AKBAR S/O. MAHEBOOBGANI BILEKUDRI VS. SRI DR. K.G.CHANDRASHEKHARA AND ANOTHER] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Complainant is also absent. This shows that, the Complainant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3...
Smt Manjavva D/O Deekappa Hosamani vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SMT MANJAVVA D/O DEEKAPPA HOSAMANI VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnatak...
Sri. H M Vageeshaiah vs the Executive Officer,
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SRI. H M VAGEESHAIAH VS. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER,] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,the pa...
Shri. Ramesh S/O. Jambanna Beleri vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Orders
Decided on: Nov-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD[SHRI. RAMESH S/O. JAMBANNA BELERI VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIALORAL ORDERCase is called out. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also absent. This shows that, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »