The Executive Engineer (Ele) vs Shri Shrinivas S/O Shripadrao Kulkarni

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Nov 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1610156

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1610156
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Addl. Registrar Judicial
Decided On: Nov 28, 2025
Case Number: WA/100077/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Executive Engineer (Ele)

Respondent

Shri Shrinivas S/O Shripadrao Kulkarni

Excerpt

in the high court of karnataka at dharwad[the executive engineer (ele) and another vs. shri shrinivas s/o shripadrao kulkarni] 28.11.2025 (video conferencing / physical hearing) coram: addl. registrar judicialoral ordercase is called out. the learned counsel for the appellant is absent. as per order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. but, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. the learned counsel for the appellant is also absent. this shows that, the appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. as per chapter-xii, rule 14(2) of karnataka high court rules, the registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. as per chapter-xii, rule 14(3) of karnataka high court rules,the party is entitled to apply for setting aside the peremptory orderby making an application to the court having assignment of the subject. -2- hence, the following order is passed by exercising the powers as per chapter-xii, rule 14(2) of karnataka high court rules.orderthe memorandum of appeal filed by the appellant under sec. 4 of the karnataka high court act is dismissed for non-compliance of the office objections, with no order as to costs. the appellant is entitled to apply for setting aside this order by making an application to the court having assignment of the subject as per chapter-xii, rule 14(3) of karnataka high court rules, 1959. sd/- (jerald rudolph mendonca) addl. registrar (judicial) & nomiated registrar list no.: 56 sl no.: 34

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
[THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) AND ANOTHER VS. SHRI SHRINIVAS S/O SHRIPADRAO KULKARNI] 28.11.2025 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIAL

ORAL ORDER

Case is called out. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is absent. As per Order dated : 28.10.2025, this case is listed on this day for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections. But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 28.10.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is also absent. This shows that, the Appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended. As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules,

the party is entitled to apply for setting aside the peremptory order

by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject. -2- Hence, the following Order is passed by exercising the powers as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules.

ORDER

The Memorandum of Appeal filed by the Appellant under Sec. 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act is dismissed for non-compliance of the office objections, with no order as to costs. The Appellant is entitled to apply for setting aside this Order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, 1959. Sd/- (JERALD RUDOLPH MENDONCA) ADDL. REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) & NOMIATED REGISTRAR List No.: 56 Sl No.: 34

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties The Executive Engineer (Ele) vs Shri Shrinivas S/O Shripadrao... Same Judge Addl. Registrar Judicial