Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jayanti Devi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.648 o1. Jayanti Devi 2.Rajeshwar Prasad Singh 3.Dhananjay Kumar Singh @ Dhananjay Singh 4.Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kr. Singh 5.Sushma Singh @ Sushma Devi.........Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr. Devesh Krishna For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2:Mr.S.K.Singh 6/ 23.9.13. Mr.Devesh Krishna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners again reiterated that the petitioners are ready to settle the matrimonial dispute by giving due share to the complainant in the properties. Upon it, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 submits that he needs to take instruction in this regard and therefore, the matter be posted in the next week. As prayed for on behalf of the opposite party no.2, let this matter be listed in the next week under the same heading. Till then, interim order passed on 19.8.2013 shall continue. ( R. R. Prasad, J.) N...
Barun Kumar Maity Alias Barun Maity Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3571 of 2013 Barun Kumar Maity @ Barun Maity... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.A.S. Pati For the State: Mr. P.K. Choudhary ,APP 2/23.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Man Singh Tudu and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3939 o1. Man Singh Tudu 2. Aladi Tudu ... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. D.K. Karmakar For the State: Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ,APP 2/23.09.2013: It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no. 1, namely, Man Singh Tudu has been arrested, therefore, anticipatory bail application filed on his behalf has become infructuous. Accordingly, anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioner no. 1, namely, Man Singh Tudu is dismissed as infructuous. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through 'FAX' at the cost of petitioner. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Arjun Prasad Singh Vs. Excise Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4397 of 2013 Arjun Prasad Singh .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Dubey For the Respondents : J.C. to G.A. & Mr. Suresh Kumar, S.C. 03/23.09.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. It is the case of the petitioner that he superannuated on 30.7.2009 while working as Incharge, Assistant Commissioner of Excise in the respondent- Department of Excise, Government of Jharkhand. During his service period he was granted the benefits of 2nd Assured Career Progression(A.C.P.) vide order contained in memo no. 1021 dated 5.8.2008 w.e.f. 30.8.2007. It is the contention of the petitioner that the pay fixation consequent thereof has also been made vide communication contained in memo no. 3118 dated 1.11.2010 issued by the Under Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Jharkhand vide Annexure-4 in which petitioner h...
Subodh Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7176 of 2013 Subodh Kumar Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:23. d September, 2013 The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had no knowledge that this case had been lodged against him and that the in-laws and the husband of the deceased have been acquitted in S.T. No. 16 of 2011 by order dated 19.10.2012. That the petitioner is in custody since 22.06.2013. Learned A.P.P while opposing the bail of the petitioner, has not controverted the submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance of the ...
Daman Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7226 of 2013 Daman Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Vandana Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:23. d September, 2013 The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. and the statement of the prosecutrix made under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C, it appears that she is a major girl and she is aged about 18 years. There is no allegation of forcible intercourse or rape the allegation is that on the pretext of marrying her, the petitioner had sexual relationship with her for a period of time and when she became pregnant, she disclosed this fact to the petitioner and asked him to marry ...
Nafis Ahmad Alias Pappu Alias Nafis Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand an ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2282 of 2013 Nafis Ahmad @ Pappu @ Nafis Khan... ....Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Irfat Jahan @ Maro ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmad For the State: Mr. D.K. Chakraverty, APP For the O.P. No. 2 Mr. Pravin Kumar Rana 5/23.09.2013: It is pointed out by the office that in order no. 4, due to inadvertence, date of order has been wrongly typed. It appears that aforesaid case disposed of on 17.09.2013 but it was typed as 17.02.2012. Under the said circumstances, the aforesaid mistake is hereby rectified and it is ordered that in the order no. 4, in place of 17.02.2012, it should be read as 17.09.2013. In view of the aforesaid modification, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below on 03.10.2013. other observations made in the aforesaid order remain as it is. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Jaswa Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3927 o1. Jaswa Devi 2. Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Yadav... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Shailendra Jit For the State: Mr. Abhishek Kumar ,APP 2/23.09.2013: It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner no. 2, namely, Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Yadav has been arrested, therefore, anticipatory bail application filed on his behalf has become infructuous. Accordingly, anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioner no. 2, namely, Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Yadav is dismissed as infructuous. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Khirodhar Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 224 of 2013 Khorodhar Yadav ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.K. Sahay For the State: Mr. G.S. Prasad ,APP 5/23.09.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Khirodhar Yadav is moved by Sri P.K. Sahay opposed by Sri G.S. Prasad, learned Additional P.P. Petitioner implicated in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused. It further appears that another co-accused, namely, Rakesh Mahto against whom there is similar allegation, has been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 31.10.2012 in ABA No. 2826 of 2012. The criminal antecedent report of the petitioner shows that he had no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 03.10.2013 and in that event the court below is directed...
Praveen Kumar Mishra Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4356 of 2012 Praveen Kumar Mishra ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi For the State: Mr. Tapas Kabiraj ,APP 11/23.09.2013: As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, put up this case after six week. The order by which the interim order has been vacated be communicated to the Superintendent of Police of concerned District, through Fax, for taking appropriate action against the petitioner. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »