Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhruv Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4208 of 2012 Dhruv Kumar Agrawal ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Naveen Kumar Jaiswal For the State: Mr. S.S. Choudhary ,APP 14/23.09.2013: As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, put up this case in the next week. Interim order dated 30.01.2013 is hereby vacated. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned for taking appropriate action against the petitioner. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Suresh Oraon Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.370 of 2013 Suresh Oraon. Appellant. Versus The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT For the Appellant : Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. 04/23.09.2013: On receipt of lower courts' record, learned counsel for the appellant pressed for the appellant's suspension of sentence and his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Mr. A. K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant, submitted that the appellant has become a victim of false implication; however, the prosecution has failed to establish the charge against the appellant; the prosecution witnesses, including the prosecutrix, have not supported the charge; one of the prosecutrix, namely,Phulmani LakraP.W.3 though has named this appellant in examina...
Sunil Koda Alias Sunil Kora Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 413 of 2013 Sunil Koda @ Sunil Kora Appellant -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand Respondent. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI. HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellant : - Ms. Chaitali Chatterjee Sinha, Advocate. For the State : - A.P.P. 04/23.09.2013 On receipt of the lower court records, learned counsel for the appellant pressed the prayer for suspension of sentence of the appellant and his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Ms. Chaitali Chatterjee Sinha, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant has been falsely implicated in the case only on suspicion; there is no eye-witness to the occurrence, nor there is any cogent circumstantial evidence on record to establish charge against the appellant; the only allegation is that the deceased was last seen going with the appellant; no incriminating article has been recovered from the appellant's possession; the app...
Basant Sao Alias Basant Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1638 of 2013 Basant Sao @ Basant Prasad ... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the State : APP ----- 02/23.09.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. This application has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of Nagar Untari P.S. Case No.24 of 2011 (G.R. No.128 of 2011) including the order dated 18.08.2011 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa, whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act has been taken against the petitioner. The case of the prosecution, as it appears from the first information report, is that the informant-a Block Supply Officer, Nagar Untari, when received information that the petitioner has been indulging himself, in selling...
Babu Ram Tudu Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 423 of 2013 Babu Ram Tudu ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. S.P.Roy For the State: Mr. S.K. Sharma ,APP 5/23.09.2013: After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application for filing regular bail application. Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the same. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. If the regular bail application is filed, the court below will dispose of the same without being prejudiced by this order. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Bimal Kumar Kedia Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1692 of 2013 Bimal Kumar Kedia...........................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr. Lukesh Kumar For the State : A.P.P 2/ 23.9.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order under which cognizance of the offence has been taken is barred by limitation and thereby the order taking cognizance is fit to be set aside. In view of the submission, let notice be issued to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites under registered cover with A/D must be filed by 27.9.2013. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, further proceeding of Complaint Case No.338 of 2011, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad shall remain stayed so far the petitio...
Ram Jee Sah Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No.321 of 2013 Ram Jee Sah ......Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .Respondent ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ---- For the Appellant : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. H.K. Shikarwar, APP --- 06/23-09-2013 On receipt of Lower Court Records, learned counsel for the appellant pressed the prayer for suspension of sentence and his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant, submitted that the appellant's conviction is based on absolutely no evidence; the only evidence is that this appellant along with others (out of them some accused have been acquitted) was walking in the 'Mela' and after some time he was seen raising slogan 'Naxal Jindabad'; there is no evidence even remotely for suspecting this appellant as accused for committing offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned ...
Deepak Tudu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7225 of 2013 Deepak Tudu Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kailash Pd. Deo, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:23. d September, 2013 The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code, subsequently Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act have been added. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and two witnesses have been examined under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C where they have not stated that they have seen this petitioner taking away or abducting the deceased, Bindeshwari Paswan, who is son-in-law of the informant. That only material which has come during investigation that the Bol...
Sanjay Ghosh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 68 of 2013 Sanjay Ghosh ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.K. Sahay For the State: Mr. S.P. Jha ,APP 8/23.09.2013: As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, put up this case in the next week. In the meantime, interim order dated 5.3.2013 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Sampat Bhai Patel and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1493 o1. Sampat Bhai Patel 2.Bipin Bhai Patel..................................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K.Das For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2:Mr.Rajesh Kumar 13/ 23.9.13. Mr.Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 submits that earlier since the opposite party no.2 was out of station, nothing could be done in the matter relating to settlement but now since he has come, it is quite likely that during this week, both the parties will be sitting together to resolve their dispute and therefore, the matter be posted on 30.9.2013 under the heading for orders. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 30.9.2013 under the heading for orders. Till then, interim order passed on 12.6.2013 shall continue. ( R. R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »