Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bimal Kumar Kedia Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Bimal Kumar Kedia vs State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 23, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1086412

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bimal Kumar Kedia

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p. no.1692 of 2013 bimal kumar kedia...........................petitioner versus state of jharkhand and another …. opposite parties coram: hon’ble mr.justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner: mr. lukesh kumar for the state : a.p.p 2/ 23.9.13. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order under which cognizance of the offence has been taken is barred by limitation and thereby the order taking cognizance is fit to be set aside. in view of the submission, let notice be issued to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites under registered cover with a/d must be filed by 27.9.2013. let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. till then, further proceeding of complaint case no.338 of 2011, pending in the court of judicial magistrate, 1st class, dhanbad shall remain stayed so far the petitioner is concerned. ( r. r. prasad, j.) nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1692 of 2013 Bimal Kumar Kedia...........................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another …. Opposite Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr. Lukesh Kumar For the State : A.P.P 2/ 23.9.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order under which cognizance of the offence has been taken is barred by limitation and thereby the order taking cognizance is fit to be set aside. In view of the submission, let notice be issued to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites under registered cover with A/D must be filed by 27.9.2013. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, further proceeding of Complaint Case No.338 of 2011, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad shall remain stayed so far the petitioner is concerned. ( R. R. Prasad, J.) ND/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial