Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhananjay Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2401 of 2013 Dhananjay Kumar Singh... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey For the State: Mr. S.S. Sahay, APP 5/24.09.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Dhananjay Kumar Singh in connection with Sakchi P.S. Case No. 20 of 2013 ( G.R. No. 192 of 2013) pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum is moved by Sri Arun Kumar Pandey and opposed by Sri S.S. Sahay, learned Additional P.P. In view of the allegations made in the FIR, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his anticipatory bail application rejected. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Narayan Sanyal Alias Vijay Alias Naveen Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4510 of 2013 Narayan Sanyal @ Vijay @ Naveen... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Jitendra S. Singh For the State: Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, APP 7/24.09.2013: It appears that charge sheet submitted against the petitioner only under section 467,468, 471 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code on 02.04.2013. In the said charge sheet, it is stated that still the investigation is going on, with respect to offences under section 38,39 and 40 of the Unlawful Activities ( Prevention) Act and section 66(D) of Information Technology Act. Under the said circumstance, the Investigating Officer, namely, Sri Ratneshwar Thakur, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh is directed to remain physically present in this Court on 01.10.2013 and produce the supplementary case diary as to how much progress made in the investigation and what materials received by him during...
Seva Maraiya Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.322 of 2012 Seva Maraiya Appellant. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT ------ For the Appellant :M/s.D.K. Dubey & S.S. Choudhary, Advocates. For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A. No.6575 of 2013:6. /24.9.2013: In this interlocutory application, appellant-Seva Maraiya has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there is no cogent evidence on record against the appellant; PWs 3 & 4 are said to have witnessed the occurrence but they did not disclose the same to anybody in the village for several days; witnesses named the appellant after more than eleven days; no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the appellant; even dead body of the deceased has not been identified; photograph was said to be the evidence of recovery of dead body of the...
John Alois Kullu Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2245 of 2013 John Alois Kullu ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. S.K. Sharma For the State: Mr. S.S. Choudhary, APP 7/24.09.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner John Alois Kullu in connection with Complaint Case No. 243 of 2011 pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Gumla is moved by Sri S.K. Sharma and opposed by Sri S.S. Choudhary , learned Additional P.P. It is alleged that petitioner along with one Nagendra Prasad got loan of Rs. 20,05,000/- sanctioned in the name of complainant and his wife and withdrew Rs. 17,000,00/- . Later on, when complainant came to know, petitioner gave cheque of Rs. 15,000,00/- to the complainant but when the same was submitted in the Bank for withdrawal, the said cheques were dishonoured. Accordingly, present case filed. In view of the aforesaid allegations, I am not inclined to enla...
Chinta Mani Devi Vs. Water Resources Departement
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No. 1129 of 2013 Chinta Mani Devi ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner :Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the Respondents :Mr. R. Bhengra 3 23.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner claiming herself to be the widow of late Satya Nand Sharma, a junior engineer, prays for a direction upon the respondent to fix pension from 30.11.2002 i.e. the last date of retirement of her husband at Galudih Right Canal Division No.1, Musabani, District East Singhbhum, who died on 4.6.2010. The petitioner is said to be getting her family pension. However, according to the petitioner, her husband had been granted the benefit of second ACP on completion of 24 years of service w.e.f. 9.8.1999 by an order dated 21.2.2007, Annexure 1, issued by t...
Ejaz Ahmad Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1594 of 2013 Ezaj Ahmad @ Md Ezaj ... ....Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Hamida Khatoon ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Arshad Hussain Mr. Haider Ali For the State: Mr. Tapas Roy, APP For the O.P. No. 2 Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha 9/23.09.2013: It is pointed out by the office that in order no. 8, due to inadvertence, date of order has been wrongly typed. It appears that aforesaid case disposed of on 17.09.2013 but it was typed as 17.02.2012. Under the said circumstances, the aforesaid mistake is hereby rectified and it is ordered that in the order no. 8, in place of 17.02.2012, it should be read as 17.09.2013. In view of the aforesaid modification, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below on 03.10.2013. other observations made in the aforesaid order remain as it is. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Ashok Kumar Barnwal Alias Ashok Prasad and ors Vs. the State of Jharkh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3376 o1. Ashok Kumar Barnwal alias Ashok Prasad 2.Nilam Barnwal alias Nilam Devi 3.Ravi Shankar 4.Shashi Bhushan @ Shashi Bhushan Kumar....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha For the State: Mr. S.K. Pandey-II ,APP 5/23.09.2013: It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner nos. 1 and 2, namely, Ashok Kumar Barnwal alias Ashok Prasad and Nilam Barnwal alias Nilam Devi have been arrested, therefore, anticipatory bail application filed on their behalf has become infructuous. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioner nos. 1 and 2, namely, Ashok Kumar Barnwal alias Ashok Prasad and Nilam Barnwal alias Nilam Devi is dismissed as infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect no. 9(i) within one week, failing which this application shall...
Vijay Mandal and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No.313 o1. Vijay Mandal.2. Dilip Bhagat. ......Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand .Respondent ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ---- For the Appellants : Mr. P.C. Tripathy, Advocate For the State : Mr. H. K. Shikarwar, APP --- 05/23-09-2013 On receipt of Lower Court Records, learned counsel for the appellants pressed the prayer for suspension of sentence and their release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Mr. P.C. Tripathy, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that the appellants' conviction is based on absolutely no evidence; the only evidence is that these appellants along with others (out of them some accused have been acquitted) were walking in the 'Mela' and after some time they were seen raising slogan 'Naxal Jindabad'; there is no evidence even remotely for suspecting these appellants as accused for committing offence unde...
Binod Ram and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7186 o1. Binod Ram 2. Bajrangi Kumar Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Rashmi Kumari, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:23. d September, 2013 The petitioners have been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the allegation in the First Information Report is that this petitioner along with other accused persons had called the informant's grandmother a 'dain' and dragged her out the house whereafter, one, Rajesh Ram assaulted with iron rod on her head. It is submitted that co-accused, namely, Prakash Ram, has been admitted on bail in B.A. No. 5076 of 2013 by this Court. Learned A.P.P while opposing the bail of the ...
Md Shamim Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4567 of 2012 Md. Shamim ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the State: Mr. Pranay Kumar Jaiswal ,APP 10/23.09.2013: As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, put up this case after six week. The order by which the interim order has been vacated be communicated to the Superintendent of Police of concerned District, through Fax, for taking appropriate action against the petitioner ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »