Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nirmal Sao and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6840 o1. Nirmal Sao 2. Mahabir Sao ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Chandra Shekhar Prasad, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 17.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 325, 326 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 75 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 466 of 2013. There is allegation against the petitioners and other co-accused persons to have assaulted and injured the informant, his daughter and brother. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Nirmal Sao and Mahabir Sao, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten th...
Md.Tahir Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 798 of 2005 Md. Tahir Ansari ..... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ...... Respondent --- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Appellant : M/s Anil Kumar, Shashi Kumar, Santosh Kr. Soni, Advs. For the respondent : A.P.P. - -- I.A. (Cr.) No. 6549 of 2013 :06. 17.09.2013 In this interlocutory application, the appellant has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though the appellant's prayer for bail was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for more than eight years; the appellant's conviction is based on presumption; the appeal is of the year 2005 and there is no likelihood of hearing of appeal in near future. Learned A.P.P. opposed the appellant's prayer for bail and submitted that the appellant is the husband of the deceased; there is direct allegation and material on record against the appell...
Mukesh Kumar Manjhi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2663 of 2013 Mukesh Kumar Manjhi ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Gaurav For the State: Mr. D.K. Chakraverty , APP 3/17.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1799 of 2013 Ashok Kumar Singh ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Renu Devi ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anand Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate ........ 04/17.09.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Ashok Kumar Singh is moved by Sri Kailash Prasad Deo learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Anand Kr. Pandey learned Additional PP for the State and Sri Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. Petitioner is ready to keep opposite party No.2 as his wife with all love and affection. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2 submits that she has no objection if petitioner give undertaking that he will not torture opposite party No.2 in future. In view of the aforesaid submissions, I allow this anticipatory bail applicati...
Subhash Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1832 of 2013 Subhash Kumar ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Jharkhand State Electricity Board ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Nitin Kr. Pasari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prem Prakash, A.P.P. For the J.S.E.B : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate ........ 03/17.09.2013 This application has been filed by petitioner for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 1501 of 2013, which was dismissed for non-compliance of order dated 24.06.2013. In view of the reasons stated in this application I allow this application and Cr.M.P. No. 1501 of 2013 is restored to its original file. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Satayendra...
Ashok Kumar Bhandari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2577 of 2013 Ashok Kumar Bhandari ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Ram Kumar Kataria For the State: Ms. Anita Sinha , APP 3/17.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Rupesh Kumar Karmeh Alias Rupesh Karmeh and ors Vs. the State of Jhark ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3080 o1. Rupesh Kumar Karmeh @ Rupesh Karmeh 2. Dinesh Kumar Karmeh @ Dinesh Karmeh 3. Kamal Raj Jajware ... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Hardeo Prasad Singh For the State: Mr. Tapas Roy , APP 2/17.09.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Tarakeshwar Yadav and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1726 o1. Tarkeshwar Yadav.2. Hari Kishore Yadav ......Appellants 1. Versus The State of Jharkhand .Respondent ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ---- For the Appellants : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State : APP For the Informant : Mr. A.K. Choudhary, Advocate --- I.A. No. 6980 o10. 17-09-2013 In this I.A., the appellant no. 2-Hari Kishore Yadav has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though his same prayer was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for more than 10 years; co-convict and appellant no. 1-Tarkeshwar Yadav on similar facts and evidences on record, has been granted bail by this Court by order dated 03.09.2013, passed in I.A. No. 6363 of 2013. Learned APP as also learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer but they have not disputed the said facts and contentions...
Sonu Das Alias Sumit Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6836 of 2013 Sonu Das @ Sumit Das ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 17.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Pirtand P.S. Case No. 18 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 725 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that the petitioner was apprehended along with other co-accused persons on 20.3.2012 and it is alleged that they were realising money from the vehicles impersonating themselves to be the police officers. From possession of the petitioner, one loaded pistol was recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Sonu Das @ Sumit Das, on bail. Accordingl...
Hasina Khatoon Vs. Rubi Chandra and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7457 of 2012 Hasina Khatoon Petitioner -V e r s u s- Rubi Chandra & Others Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : Mrs. Nitu Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondents : 06/17.09.2013 This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 12.04.2012 passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division No. 10, Dhanbad in Title Suit No. 56 of 1999, whereby and whereunder he dismissed the application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner for sending the sale deeds and other documents for examination by the expert. The learned court below dismissed the aforesaid application on the ground that only the certified copies of sale deeds and other documents are available on record. The original of aforesaid documents have not been filed by the parties. Thus, question of sending certified copies of documents for examination by the expert does not arise. Therefore, I find no illegality in the said order. Accordingly, th...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »