Jharkhand Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar JaIn Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.600 of 2013 Ashok Kumar Jain ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Raj Mangal Singh For the State: Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, S.C. III 2/20.09.2013: This application has been filed for restoration of W.P.(Cr) No. 351 of 2012 which was dismissed on 22.2.2013 for non compliance of order date 08.02.2013. In view of the submissions made in this application, the same is allowed and W.P.(Cr) No. 351 of 2012 is restored to its original file. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Md NasimuddIn Ansari Vs. Kausar Jahan and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 813 of 2013 Md. Nasimuddin Ansari ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Devesh Krishna For the State: Mr. R. Mukhopadhyay 2/20.09.2013: This application has been filed for restoration of W.P.(Cr) No. 340 of 2012 which was dismissed on 22.2.2013 for non compliance of order date 08.02.2013. In view of the submissions made in this application, the same is allowed and W.P.(Cr) No. 340 of 2012 is restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to comply the order dated 08.02.2013 by tomorrow. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Prakash Mahto and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.App.(S.J) No.526 o1. Prakash Mahto 2. Haradhan Mahato ...................Appellants VERSUS State of Jharkhand ........................Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Appellants: Mr. Sabyasanchi For the State :A.P.P 2/20.9.13. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the sentence imposed since has been served out, the appellants are not interested in prosecuting this appeal. In view of the submission, let this case be dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
FakhruddIn Ansari Alias Ajimur Rahman Alias RakruddIn Ansari and anr V ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1732 o1. Fakhruddin Ansari @ Ajimur Rahman @ Fakruddin Ansari 2.Abdul Rahim @ Rahim Ansari... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Laljee Sahay For the State: Mr. G.S. Prasad, APP 2/20.09.2013: This application has been ffiled for modification of order dated 10.06.2013 passed in ABA No. 1650 of 2013. By the said order, while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners, petitioners were directed to surrender in the court below within two weeks and the court below was directed to consider the fact while hearing the bail application that there is no allegation of rape against these petitioners and other two co-accused, against whom there are similar allegations, have been granted anticipatory bail. It is submitted that after the aforesaid order, petitioner fell seriously ill and due to the illness, he could not surrender within...
State of Jharkhand Th.D.C.Sing Vs. Ajit Kumar Gorai
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. 362 of 2003 The State of Jharkhand ..Appellant Versus Ajit Kumar Gorai ..Respondent ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Appellant : Mr. V.K. Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr.R.C.P. Sah, Advocate ---- I.A. No. 7323 o06. 20-09-2013 In this I.A., the appellant has prayed for substitution of heir and legal representative of sole respondent. It has been stated that the sole respondent-Ajit Kumar Gorai died on 11.06.2013 leaving behind his only son Tapas Gorai as his heir and legal representative. Full address of the said legal heir is given in paragraph 6 of the application. The application is within time. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondent, has no objection. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. Prayer for substitution of heir and legal representative of sole respondent stands allowed. I.A. No. 7223 of 2013 is disposed of. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Mallu Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8755 of 2013 Mallu Yadav ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha (2), Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 20.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 414, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 30(ii) of the Coal Mines Act and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, in connection with Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 15 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 445 of 2013. The petitioner is alleged to be involved in illegal mining and transaction of coal. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Mallu Yadav, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with ...
Gango Mahto and ors Vs. Ganesh Mahto and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. 311 of 2002 Gango Mahto & Others ..Appellants Versus Ganesh Mahto & Others ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Appellants : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Manjul Prasad, Advocate ---- I.A. No. 2048 of 2013 and I.A. No. 2049 o15. 20-09-2013 The appellants have prayed for substitution of the heirs and legal representatives of respondent no. 7 after condoning the delay in filing application for substitution. It has been stated that respondent no. 7 namely Jitan Mahto died in the month of November, 2011 leaving behind his widow and sons as heirs and legal representatives. Their names and addresses are described in paragraph 2 of I.A. No. 2048/2013. It has been submitted that appellant no. 1 is the pairvikar. He is an old man and suffering from multiple ailments. He is mostly confined to bed. He could know about the death of respondent no. 7 on 5.1.2013. The appellant therea...
Roshan Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont Case (Civil) No. 863 of 2011 Roshan Kumar ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..Opposite Parties ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. M.M. Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, J.C. to Sr. S.C. 1 ---- 05/20-09-2013 Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, learned counsel for the opposite parties, submitted that in compliance of the order of this Court, a decision has been taken regarding issuance of appointment letter on compassionate ground and a letter to that effect shall be issued in favour of the petitioner within a day or two. Thereafter affidavit shall be filed annexing appointment letter. As prayed for by learned counsel for the opposite parties, put up this case on 27th September, 2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Pir Mohammad Vs. Managing Director the Tata Steel Limited and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 986 of 2012 Pir Mohammad ..... Petitioner Versus Managing Director, Tata Steel Ltd & Another ..... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. K.P. Choudhary, Advocate For the O.P. No.1 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 8/ 20.09.2013 This application will be heard. Admit. Opposite party No. 1 has appeared through advocate. As such, no notice need be issued. Call for the Lower Court Records. During the pendency of this revision application, the petitioner, Pir Mohammad, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Economic Offence), Jamshedpur, in connection with Complaint Case C-1 No. 175 of 2006/ Tr. No. 41 of 2009. I. A. No. 6719 of 2013 In view of the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner stat...
Tapan Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8951 of 2013 Tapan Das @ Tapas Das ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 20.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 414, 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chirkunda (Maithan) P.S. Case No. 152 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 2502 of 2013. The petitioner is alleged to be involved in theft and transaction of stolen coal. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Tapan Das @ Tapas Das, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judi...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »