Pir Mohammad Vs. Managing Director the Tata Steel Limited and anr

Pir Mohammad vs Managing Director the Tata Steel Limited and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 20, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1086317

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1086317
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Sep 20, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pir Mohammad

Respondent

Managing Director the Tata Steel Limited and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. revision no. 986 of 2012 pir mohammad ..... … petitioner versus managing director, tata steel ltd & another ..... … opposite party -------- coram : hon’ble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr. k.p. choudhary, advocate for the o.p. no.1 : mr. ajay kumar sah, advocate for the state : a.p.p. ------ 8/ 20.09.2013 this application will be heard. admit. opposite party no. 1 has appeared through advocate. as such, no notice need be issued. call for the lower court records. during the pendency of this revision application, the petitioner, pir mohammad, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned special judge (economic offence), jamshedpur, in connection with complaint case c-1 no. 175 of 2006/ tr. no. 41 of 2009. i. a. no. 6719 of 2013 in view of the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner stating that the company’s quarter in question has been surrendered by him, no order need be passed in the present interlocutory application. as such, the same stands disposed of. let this order be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 986 of 2012 Pir Mohammad ..... … Petitioner Versus Managing Director, Tata Steel Ltd & Another ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. K.P. Choudhary, Advocate For the O.P. No.1 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 8/ 20.09.2013 This application will be heard. Admit. Opposite party No. 1 has appeared through advocate. As such, no notice need be issued. Call for the Lower Court Records. During the pendency of this revision application, the petitioner, Pir Mohammad, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Economic Offence), Jamshedpur, in connection with Complaint Case C-1 No. 175 of 2006/ Tr. No. 41 of 2009. I. A. No. 6719 of 2013 In view of the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner stating that the Company’s quarter in question has been surrendered by him, no order need be passed in the present interlocutory application. As such, the same stands disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the Court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. (H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Pir Mohammad vs Managing Director the Tata Steel Limited and anr Same Subject Education