Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bishwajit Rabidas Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7623 of 2013 Bishwajit Rabidas ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Asadul Haque, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 22.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 3(a) of the R.P. (U.P.) Act, in connection with Barharwa RPF/Post Case No. 11 of 2013 corresponding to R.P.S. Case no. 13 of 2013. The petitioner is the driver of the truck seized with stolen railway D.O. Plates. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Bishwajit Rabidas, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate 1st Cl...
Ranthu Oraon Alias Vimal Toppo Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5930 of 2013 Ranthu Oraon @ Vimal Toppo ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 22.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 427 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4 of the Explosive Substance Act, Section 13(1) of the U.A.P. Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, in connection with Bishunpur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 925 of 2009. The FIR was lodged against unknown extremists with the allegation that they had blown up the building of Primacy Health Centre by explosion. No one is named in the FIR. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Ranthu Oraon @ Vimal Toppo, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named a...
Dr Ashok Kumar Vs. Birsa Agriculture University Through Its Vice Chanc ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(S)No.3306of2013 Dr.AshokKumar ... Petitioner Versus BirsaAgricultureUniversityandors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :M/s.RajivRanjan&R.R.Sinha FortheRespondents :M/s.A.Allam,Sr.Advocate& NehalaSharmin 522.8.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Thepetitionerisaggrievedbytheofficeorderdated23.5.2013, Annexure3, by which a minor penalty of withholding of one increment with cumulative effect has been imposed upon him in termsofclause13.9(2)(a)oftheBirsaAgriculturalUniversityStatute. Thecontentionofthepetitioneristhatashowcausewasissued, videAnnexure1dated12.10.2012,uponhimwiththeallegationthat he had allowed payments for six hours of minimum wages to the concernedworkmen, whoweredischargingtheirworkintheKrishi Vigyan Kendra, Dhanbad, the same being in contravention of the Minimum Wages Act, which does not provide for proportionate deductionofminimumwages. The petitioner in response defended himself by re...
Pankaj Paswan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5932 of 2013 Pankaj Paswan ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 22.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 475 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Nagar Untari P.S. Case No. 20 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 187 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that the stolen motorcycle with forged documents were recovered from the petitioner and on the basis of confessional statement made by the petitioner, more stolen motorcycles were also recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Pankaj Paswan, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail,...
Guddu Kumar Ravi Alias Upendra Kumar Ravi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5934 of 2013 Guddu Kumar Ravi @ Upendra Kumar Ravi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/22.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 of Arms Act, in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.428 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.2267 of 2012. From the FIR, it appears that there was a bank dacoity, in which the culprits, including the petitioner, were identified in the C.C. TV camera. On the basis of the said identification, the co-accused was apprehended and on his disclosure, heavy cash and fire arms were recovered from a different person. The said co-accused also disclosed that the recovered firearms were used in the bank dacoity, in which the ...
Uttam Chandra Das and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.1581 of 2003 Uttam Chandra Das Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashank Shekhar Pd., A.P.P. ------ I.A. No.5962 o15. 22.08.2013: In this application, the appellant no.3-Dipu @ Krishna Das and appellant no.4-Dijen Mondal have prayed for their release on bail during pendency of the appeal. It has been submitted that the case of these appellants and the materials found against them are identical to the appellant nos. 1 and 2; the said appellants have been granted bail by this Court on the ground of their long custody; the appellants have remained in custody for more than nine years; there is no chance of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail of the said appellants, but has not disputed th...
Lukash Hembrom Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 309 of 2006 Lukash Hembrom ..... Appellant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Respondent(s) CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar , Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- I. A. No.979 of 2011. 07 /22.08.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the State on the matter of bail. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that earlier the prayer for bail of this appellant was rejected, but the appellant has been renewing his prayer for bail as he has remained in jail custody for more 13 years and that the case is as such that the appellant cannot be said to have had an intention to commit murder, particularly when the appellant had never been alleged to have armed with any weapon rather the appellant has been said to have caused injury by stone and the dimension of the injury would also go to suggest...
Teklal Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7610 of 2013 Teklal Singh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 22.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 414, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 30(ii) of the Coal Mines Act and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, in connection with Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 55 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 1674 of 2013. The petitioner is alleged to be involved in illegal mining and transaction of coal. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Teklal Singh, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two suretie...
Asif Ansari Alias Bablu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5956 of 2013 Asif Ansari @ Bablu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zafar Alam For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/22.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.41 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.1857 of 2013. Petitioner is the husband of the victim-informant and there is allegation against him to have subjected his wife to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Asif Ansari @ Bablu is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri M. C. Narayan, ...
Rajeshwar Singh and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.143 o1. Rajeshwar Singh 2. Bhola Singh Appellants. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT ------ For the Appellants: Mr.Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate. For the State : APP ------ I.A. (Cr.) No.5909 of 2013:4. /22.8.2013: In this interlocutory application, the appellant - Rajeshwar Singh, has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though his same prayers were earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for about 11 years; there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future; the appellant deserves to be released on bail. Learned A.P.P. opposed the appellant's prayer for bail and submitted that this is a case of double murder and number of injuries, showing penetrating injuries, on the person of the deceased, have been found; ocular evidence of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »