Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 309 of 2006 Lukash Hembrom ..... Appellant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Respondent(s) CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar , Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- I. A. No.979 of 2011. 07 /22.08.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the State on the matter of bail. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that earlier the prayer for bail of this appellant was rejected, but the appellant has been renewing his prayer for bail as he has remained in jail custody for more 13 years and that the case is as such that the appellant cannot be said to have had an intention to commit murder, particularly when the appellant had never been alleged to have armed with any weapon rather the appellant has been said to have caused injury by stone and the dimension of the injury would also go to suggest that the appellant had certainly not intention to commit murder. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, during the pendency of this appeal, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of [Sri Ashok Kumar Chand] learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Dumka, in connection with Sessions Trial No.314 of 2000. Accordingly, I. A. (Crl.) No.979 of 2011, stands allowed and disposed of,. (R. R. Prasad, J.) (D. N. Upadhyay, J.) Sandeep/