Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md. Siraj Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.6432of2012 In Cr.Appeal(DB)No.394of2012 Md.Siraj .......Appellant Versus StateofJharkhand&others .....Respondents. CORAM: HONBLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR. FortheAppellant :Mr.AltafHussain,Advocate FortheState:Mr.T.N.Verma,A.P.P. ForRespondentno.2:Mr.RaviPrakash,Advocate. 10/Dated:26 th August,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the original respondent nos. 5 and 7 have expired and therefore, this interlocutory applicationhasbeenpreferred,buttheappellantisnotknowingwhatis thedateofdeathofboththeserespondentsnorhehasdeathcertificateof respondentnos.5and7andtherefore,counselfortheappellantisseeking time.2. Time,asprayedfor,isgranted.3. Postthismatteron16thSeptember,2013. (D.N.Patel,A.C.J) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) VK/...
Deepak Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 70 of 2011 --- Deepak Choudhary --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Prabhash Kumar, Advocate For the State: JC to SC-II --- I.A. No. 6271 /2013 --- 04/ 26.08.2013 The petitioner seeks early hearing of the writ application as this case is said to have covered by a judgment rendered in WPS No. 405/12. According to him, he should be promoted to the B.Sc Trained Scale from the date of acquisition of qualification on 25th August 1992, whereas respondents have granted it with effect from 27th September 2010. In the circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation before the respondent no. 3 - Regional Deputy Director of Education, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi with the aforesaid claim. On receipt of such representation, the respondent no. 3 shall examine the same upon verification of the...
Bharat Arogya Mandir Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI S.A.No.197of2004 BharatArogyaMandir(Nowknownas BharatArogyaAndGyanMandir). .Appellant. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI FortheAppellant : Mr.PandeyNeerajRai,Advocate FortheRespondents : None 07/26.08.2013: This appeal shall be heard on the following substantial questionsoflaw:1. Whether the findings of the learned courts below regardingvestingofthesuitlandintheStateofBihar (asthenwas)isvitiatedandunsustainable: (a)fornonconsiderationofthelegalimplicationof the provision of Section 6(c) of the Bihar Land ReformsAct,1950(hereinaftertobereferredas'the Act'); (b)inabsenceofanyproofofnotificationofvesting asenvisagedunderSections3,3(A)and3(B)ofthe Act;and (c)inviewofchangeofthenatureofthelandby virtueofregistereddeedsofusufructuarymortgage dated 29th January, 1941Ext.5, deed of Chhaparbandi SettlementExt.4 read with Ext.2 followedbytherentreceiptsExts.9series? 2. Whether the suit land having been mort...
Kamlakar Prasad Mishra and anr Vs. Prema Singh and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2691 of 2013 Kamlakar Prasad Mishra & Anr. ... Petitioners -Versus- Prema Singh & Ors. ....... Respondents. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioners : Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate For the Respondents : ------ 4/26.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for two weeks' time for taking steps for service of notice on the respondents by ordinary process on their present and correct addresses. Prayer is allowed. Put up this case on 3rd October, 2013. Till then, interim order dated 22.7.2013 shall continue. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) Shamim/...
Ajay Kumar Meshram Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2124 of 2013 Ajay Kumar Meshram @ Ajay Kr. Mishram ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr.Arun Kr. Pandey For the State : A. P.P. ----- 3/26.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379/406/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sakchi P.S. Case No.304 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.3419 of 2012. From the FIR, it appears that the case was instituted for theft of Rs.1,19,97,800/- from different ATMs by the employees of M/s Writer Safeguard Pvt. Ltd., which was entrusted with the work of loading cash in different ATMs at Jamshedpur. It appears that other cases were also instituted with the same allegation against the petitioner and the other co-accused persons. The petitioner has been granted bail in two similar cases on the same alle...
Makhan Singh Alias Madan Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5262 of 2013 Makhan Singh @ Madan Singh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Pravin Kr. Pandey For the State : A. P.P. ----- 4/26.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26 of Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, in connection with Nagar Untari P.S. Case No.38 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.326 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that the petitioner was apprehended on 21.2.2013 and from the possession of the petitioner, one revolver loaded with two cartridges were recovered. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Makhan Singh @ Madan Singh is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two su...
Saryu Prasad Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.6740of2011 SaryuPrasadRam ....Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others...Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.K.K.Ojha,Adv. FortheRespondents :J.C.toA.A.G. 02/26.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The petitioner has straightaway moved this Court with a prayer for directingtherespondentsforpaymentofactualpayscaletothepetitionerfrom GradeIItoGradeIIIi.e.underSeniorSelectionGrade,afterheadmittedly retiredon30thNovember,1999itself. Thegrievanceofthepetitioneristhatothersimilarlysituatedteachers weregrantedMetricTrainedSeniorSelectionGradeatscaleofRs.680785/ whenthepetitionerwasplacedatthescaleofRs.240396/w.e.f.1stApril, 1977.Thereafteragainthescaleofthepetitionerwaswronglyfixedandhewas deprived from the scale of Super Selection Grade at Rs. 1,6402,900/ and revisedscaleofRs.5,5009,000/.However,itappearsthatafterhavingretired on30thNovember,1999,thepetitionerhasfailedtoapproachtherespondents for redres...
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Nanki Devi and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No. 204 of 2010 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ... ... ...Appellant -V e r s u s - Nanki Devi and others ... ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY For the Appellant : Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate. For the Respondents :8. 26.08.2013 The appellant is directed to take steps for substituted service of notice against Respondent No. 6 and 7 within ten days and after it is done, office is directed to serve draft publication of notice to the appellant so that notices may be published in the Hindi Hindustan daily published from Raipur, Chhatisgarh for respondent no. 6 and for respondent no. 7, the notices may be published in Hindustan English circulated in Baroda in the State of Gujrat. (D. N. Upadhyay, J.) RC...
Devendra Ray Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2749 of 2013 Devendra Ray ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani For the State : A. P.P. ----- 4/26.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 18 / 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act, in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No. 334 of 2012, corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.1 of 2012. Petitioner was apprehended with 10 KG of gnaga in his possession. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Devendra Ray is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Kod...
Koshlya Devi and ors Vs. Shankar Baidya and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 4205 of 2011 Koshlya Devi & Ors. ..Petitioners Versus Shankar Baidya & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : None ----- 09/26.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. No one appears to oppose the prayer. Permission, as sought for, is granted. This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »