Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arjun Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev. No.265 of 2013 Arjun Kumar ..............................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through Vigilance ......Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.R.Krishna For the Vigilance :Mr.Shailesh 14/ 27.8.13. As prayed for on behalf of the Vigilance, lt this matter be listed on 3.9.2013 so that supplementary counter affidavit be filed in terms of the order dated 7.8.2013. At the same time, the Vigilance would be at liberty to state further fact which would be material for this case. Upon it, Mr. R.Krishna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that adequate opportunity has already been given. If the time is allowed, the Vigilance may not take further time on the next date. Let a copy of this order be handed over to the counsel appearing for the Vigilance for needful. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Hem Nath Mishra Vs. Smt Sushma Mishra
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2402 of 2013 Hem Nath Mishra .........Petitioner Vs. Smt. Sushma Mishra ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar For the Respondent: Mr. V.K. Prasad 7/27.08.2013: As prayed for, put this case under the heading for 'Admission' in the 3rd week of September, 2013. The court below is directed to proceed with the trial. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Vikky Karmali Alias Vikky Vishwakarma Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5678 of 2013 Vikky Karmali @ Vikky Vishwakarma ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar Choubey For the State : A. P.P. ----- 3/27.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 363/366/366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.497 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. No.2200 of 2010. There is direct allegation against the petitioner to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant. The impugned order shows that the victim has been recovered and she has supported the case in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The victim is a major girl and the other co-accused has been granted bail. Learned co...
Nand Kishore Sah Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3331 of 2013 Nand Kishore Sah .......... Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ......... Respondents ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.A.G. ------ 4/27.08.2013: Since the consequence for non-filing has not been mentioned in the order dated 25.7.2013, the office shall accept requisites filed by the petitioner. Put up this case on 30th September, 2013. Till then, the interim order dated 25.7.2013 shall continue. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) Shamim/...
Ram Ekbal Singh Vs. the Mineral Area Development Authroity Through Its ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.1257of2013 RamEkbalSingh ....Petitioner Versus TheMineralAreaDevelopmentAuthority&others...Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.SomeshwarRoy,Adv. FortheRespondentsM.A.D.A :M/s.BhaweshKumar,RaviKumar &KumarRahulKamlesh,Advs. 02/27.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Thepetitionerinthepresentwritapplication,issaidtohaveretiredon 30th November, 2011, while working as Security Guard from the services of RespondentsM.A.D.A, Dhanbad. He has moved this court in the present writ application as the post retirement dues such as provident fund with contributory fund,gratuity,leaveencashment,groupinsurance,dearnessallowances,benefitsof 6thPayRevisionandA.C.P.etc.alongwithcertainarrearsofdueshavenotbeenpaid to him, though he has made representation before the competent authority of M.A.D.A.,DhanbadvideAnnexure2. LearnedcounselfortheRespondentsM.A.D.Asubmitsthatifthe petitioner approaches the competent authority i....
Shanti Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2765 of 2011 Shanti Devi Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Others Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate. For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : J.C. to S.C. (Mines) For the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5: Mr. M.K. Choubey, Advocate. 11/27.08.2013 This application has been filed against the order dated 27.10.2009 / 13.04.2010 passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhalbhum, Jamshedpur in B.P.L.E. Case No. 136 of 2009, whereby and whereunder, he issued notice for removing encroachment from Ward No. 18, Khata No. 1, New Plot No. 1755 and 1765, Rakba 0.11.25 hectare, 0.20.60 hectare, 0.0035 hectare & 0.0030 hectare.2. Thus, from perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that by the same order, the Sub-Divisional Officer has not passed order for removal of encroachment, rather he issued notice to different person for the removal of encroachment.3. Under the said circumstance, ...
Sushil Kumar Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1600 of 2013 Sushil Kumar Sinha ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : M/s R. Krishna & Kumar Amit, Advocates For the Vigilance : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Spl. P.P. -------- 11/ 27.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 403, 406, 409, 120B, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 7/13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 68 of 2010 corresponding to Special Case No. 85 of 2010. The case relates to embezzlement of huge amount of Government money meant for construction works of the school buildings in the district of Bokaro and so far as this petitioner is concerned, it is alleged that he used to prepare the cheques along wi...
Azad Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.259of2013 AzadAnsari .......Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand .....Respondent. CORAM: HONBLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR. FortheAppellant :Mr.R.C.P .Sah,Advocate FortheState:Mr.D.K.Chakraverty,A.P.P. 06/Dated:27 th August,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,A.C.J.:1. ThisappealisAdmitted.2. RecordandproceedingsoftheSessionsTrialNo.63of1997iscalled forfromthetrialcourt.3. Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the other co accusedofthesameSessionsTrialNo.63of1997havealreadypreferred CriminalAppealNo.267of2013andCriminalAppealNo.224of2013in whichthe recordandproceedingsofSessionsTrial No. 63 of1997has alreadybeenreceived by this Court and therefore,this Criminal Appeal maybeheardalongwithCriminalAppealNo.267of2013andCriminal AppealNo.224of2013.4. In view of this submission, this Criminal Appeal will be heard alongwithCr.Appeal No. 267of 2013 and Criminal Appeal No.224 of 2013.5. Registryisdirectedtoget...
Shikar Murmu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI I.A. No.6288 of 2013 In Criminal (Jail) Appeal (D.B.) No. 1260 of 2004 Shikhar Murmu .....Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... Respondent/Opp. Party ............. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ....... For the Appellant : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate For the Respondent/Opp. Party : A.P.P. ............ 06/Dated:27. h August, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.: I.A. No.6288 o1. Counsel for the appellant is not pressing this interlocutory application.2. Hence, the interlocutory application no. 6288 of 2013 is hereby disposed of as not pressed at this stage. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) (Shree Chandrashekhar, J) Satyarthi/Tanuj...
Wahid Ahmad Alias Munna and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.284of2013 WahidAhmad@Munna&others .......Appellants Versus TheStateofJharkhand .....Respondent. CORAM: HONBLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR. FortheAppellants:Mr.R.C.P .Sah,Advocate FortheState:Mr.V.S.Sahay,A.P.P. 06/Dated:27 th August,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,A.C.J.:1. ThisappealisAdmitted.2. RecordandproceedingsoftheSessionsTrialNo.63of1997iscalled forfromthetrialcourt.3. Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the other co accusedofthesameSessionsTrialNo.63of1997havealreadypreferred CriminalAppealNo.267of2013andCriminalAppealNo.224of2013in whichthe recordandproceedingsofSessionsTrial No. 63 of1997has alreadybeenreceived by this Court and therefore,this Criminal Appeal maybeheardalongwithCriminalAppealNo.267of2013andCriminal AppealNo.224of2013.4. In view of this submission, this Criminal Appeal will be heard alongwithCr.Appeal No. 267of 2013 and Criminal Appeal No.224 of 2013.5. Registryisdirec...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »