Ram Ekbal Singh Vs. the Mineral Area Development Authroity Through Its Managing Director and ors

Ram Ekbal Singh vs The Mineral Area Development Authroity Through Its Managing Director and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 27, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024767

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1024767
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Aug 27, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Ekbal Singh

Respondent

The Mineral Area Development Authroity Through Its Managing Director and ors

Excerpt

.....6thpayrevisionanda.c.p.etc.alongwithcertainarrearsofdueshavenotbeenpaid to him, though he has made representation before the competent authority of m.a.d.a.,dhanbadvideannexure2. learnedcounselfortherespondentsm.a.d.asubmitsthatifthe petitioner approaches the competent authority i.e. managing director, m.a.d.a., dhanbadwithfreshrepresentation,hisgrievancesshallbelookedintoinaccordance withlawandtheschemeframedforretiredemployeesofm.a.d.a. insuchcircumstances,sincethematterrelatestopaymentofpost retirement dues, at this stage, without commenting anything on merits upon the claimofthepetitioner,thewritpetitionisdisposedofwithlibertytothepetitionerto approach the managing director, m.a.d.a, dhanbad, respondent no. 2 with fresh representationforredressalofhisaforesaidgrievancessupportedwithallfactsand documents within a period of 3 weeks. on receipt of such representation, the respondentno.2,managingdirector,m.a.d.a,dhanbadshallconsiderthesamein accordance with law and after proper verification of the service records of the petitioner,passareasonedandspeakingorderwithinaperiodof12weeksthereafter, whichshallalsobecommunicatedtothepetitioner.needlesstosaythatifanyofthe claimsmadebythepetitionerarefoundtobegenuineandlegally admissible,the paymentsinlieuthereofshallalsobedisbursedinaccordancewithlawandscheme framedforretiredemployeesofm.a.d.a. accordingly,thewritpetitionstandsdisposedofintheaforesaidterm. (apareshkumarsingh,j)

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.1257of2013 RamEkbalSingh ....Petitioner Versus TheMineralAreaDevelopmentAuthority&others...Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.SomeshwarRoy,Adv. FortheRespondentsM.A.D.A :M/s.BhaweshKumar,RaviKumar &KumarRahulKamlesh,Advs. 02/27.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Thepetitionerinthepresentwritapplication,issaidtohaveretiredon 30th November, 2011, while working as Security Guard from the services of RespondentsM.A.D.A, Dhanbad. He has moved this court in the present writ application as the post retirement dues such as provident fund with contributory fund,gratuity,leaveencashment,groupinsurance,dearnessallowances,benefitsof 6thPayRevisionandA.C.P.etc.alongwithcertainarrearsofdueshavenotbeenpaid to him, though he has made representation before the competent authority of M.A.D.A.,DhanbadvideAnnexure2. LearnedcounselfortheRespondentsM.A.D.Asubmitsthatifthe petitioner approaches the competent authority i.e. Managing Director, M.A.D.A., Dhanbadwithfreshrepresentation,hisgrievancesshallbelookedintoinaccordance withlawandtheSchemeframedforretiredemployeesofM.A.D.A. Insuchcircumstances,sincethematterrelatestopaymentofpost retirement dues, at this stage, without commenting anything on merits upon the claimofthepetitioner,thewritpetitionisdisposedofwithlibertytothepetitionerto approach the Managing Director, M.A.D.A, Dhanbad, respondent no. 2 with fresh representationforredressalofhisaforesaidgrievancessupportedwithallfactsand documents within a period of 3 weeks. On receipt of such representation, the respondentno.2,ManagingDirector,M.A.D.A,Dhanbadshallconsiderthesamein accordance with law and after proper verification of the service records of the petitioner,passareasonedandspeakingorderwithinaperiodof12weeksthereafter, whichshallalsobecommunicatedtothepetitioner.Needlesstosaythatifanyofthe claimsmadebythepetitionerarefoundtobegenuineandlegally admissible,the paymentsinlieuthereofshallalsobedisbursedinaccordancewithlawandScheme framedforretiredemployeesofM.A.D.A. Accordingly,thewritpetitionstandsdisposedofintheaforesaidterm. (ApareshKumarSingh,J)

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Ram Ekbal Singh vs The Mineral Area Development Authroity Thr... Same Subject Land Acquisition