Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ataur Rahman and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 1407 of 2012 Ataur Rahman & Ors. ..Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C. L & C ----- 05/27.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition in order to take appropriate steps against the impugned order. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. Permission, as sought for, is granted. This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. No. 1976 of 2012 is, accordingly, disposed of. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd Through Its Managi ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 7057 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Singh .... Petitioner Versus Steel Authority of India Ltd. & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan I.A. No. 4837 of 2013 & I.A. No. 4838 o05. 27.08.2013 By way of I.A. No. 4837 of 2013 petitioner prays for impleading the C.E.O. & Appellate Authority, Steel Authority of India Limited as party respondent in the instant writ application as according to the petitioner, during the pendency of the writ application the C.E.O & Appellate Authority has dismissed the petitioner's appeal preferred against the order of his dismissal dated 16.11.2012 which has been communicated vide letter no. 989 dated 11.6.2013, annexed as Annexure-15 to I.A. No. 4838 of 2013. Petitioner, by way of I.A. No. 4838 of 2013 also seeks to impugn the said Appellate order communicated to the petitioner on 11.6.2013. Learne...
Nand Kishore Bhagat Vs. Education
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 5574 of 2012 Nand Kishore Bhagat .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.4 For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. II 05/27.08.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. In the present writ application petitioner has sought direction upon the respondents to admit his daughter namely Puja Kumari in Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Hansdiha in Class-VI for which she had undertaken the entrance test in the year 2012. According to the petitioner he was informed by letter dated 16.7.2012 by the Principal of the said school to appear with all necessary documents on 4.8.2012. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though the necessary documents were perused for verification by the respondents but on perusal of the same, the Respondents did not admit the petitioner's daughter as she was studying in private school. In such...
Raghu Nandan Prasad Singh Vs. Transport
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 1940 of 2013 Raghu Nandan Prasad Singh .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur For the Respondents : I.A. No. 3486 o05. 27.08.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application petitioner prays for certain amendments in the prayer portion as well as para-1 of the writ petition. According to the petitioner in para 1 as well as prayer portion of the main writ application inadvertently the figure Rs. 93, 587.20 has been typed instead of Rs. 2,93,587.20, which are the total admissible post retirement dues claimed by the petitioner. It is also clarified in the description of the outstanding dues claimed by the petitioner at para 7 of the writ application. In such circumstances, after hearing the parties, petitioner is allowed to make necessary correction in para 1 as well as prayer portion in the instant writ ap...
Richa Walia Alias Richa Kumari Walia Vs. Manish Kumar Soni
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Tr.Petition(Civil)No.41of2012 RichaWalia@RichaKumariWalia Petitioner Versus ManishKumarSoni Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mrs.GauriDevi,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :Mr.AnilKumrarSinha,Advocate 05/27.08.2013 Thistransferpetitionhasbeenfiledu/s24oftheCivilProcedureCode for transferring Matrimonial Title Suit No.137 of 2012 from the Court of learnedPrincipalJudge,FamilyCourt,GiridihtotheCourtoflearnedPrincipal Judge,FamilyCourt,Gumla. It is submitted that opposite party has already been appearing in the CourtatGumlainacaelodgedbythepetitioneru/s498AI.P.C.Thepetitioner, beingalady,shallsufferhardshipifsheiscompelledtogotoattendtheCourt atGiridihfromGumla. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party has opposed the argument and submitted that he is being humiliated at Gumla whenever he appearsintheCourt. LetthiscasebetransferredtoanyotherCourtwhich shuldbefreefrominfluenceofeitherparty. Consideringalltheseaspects,Ifeelin...
Usha Devi Vs. Mineral Area Dev Auth
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3139of2013 UshaDevi ....Petitioner Versus TheMineralAreaDevelopmentAuthority&others...Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.SomeshwarRoy,Adv. FortheRespondentsM.A.D.A :M/s.BhaweshKumar,RaviKumar &KumarRahulKamlesh,Advs. 02/27.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Thepetitionerintheinstantcase,claimsherselftobethewidowofthe deceasedemployee,BholaSingh,whoissaidtohavediedinthecapacityof Shodhak in harness on 28th January, 2012, while working under the RespondentsM.A.D.A.asperthedeathcertificatecontainedatAnnexure1. Thegrievanceofthepetitioneristhatthedeathcumretiraldues ofthedeceasedemployeesuchasprovidentfundwithcontributorybenefits, gratuity,leaveencashment,groupinsurance,dearnessallowances,benefitsof 6th Pay Revision, difference payments of 1stTime Bound Promotion & 2nd TimeBoundPromotion,benefitsofA.C.P.aswellasanyotherlegitimatedues, have not been paid to her despite representations made before the Re...
Puran Rai Alias Puro Rai Alias Puran Roy Alias Puro Roy Vs. the State ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5991 of 2013 Puran Rai @ Puro Rai @ Puran Roy @ Puro Roy ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Laljee Sahay, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 27.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jama P.S. Case No. 88 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1036 of 2012, S.C No.66 of 2013 for the offence under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to dacoity and murder and the case was instituted against unknown. The impugned order shows that the petitioner has been made accused in this case only on the basis of confessional statements of the co-accused persons. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Puran Rai @ Puro Rai @ Puran Roy @ Puro Roy on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named abo...
Kali Pado Paul and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1161 of 2009 With I. A. No. 2868 of 2012 Kali Pado Paul & Others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioners - Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Respondents - Mr. J.C to S.C (L&C) ----- 13/27.8.2013 Though in the writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction on the respondents to consider and allow mutation in their favour, in the interlocutory application, the prayer has been made to consider the petitioners' claim in the light of the stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit filed in W.P.(C) No. 2801/2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the said case, one of the purchasers from Asha Devi was the petitioner and the respondents had accepted the petitioner's claim. In the instant case, the petitioners also are the purchasers from Asha Devi and others and as such their claim is required to be c...
Arun Kumar Vs. Home Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.7411of2012 ArunKumar ....Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others...Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :M/s.SauravArunandDeepakKumarDubey,Adv. FortheRespondents :J.C.toG.A. 02/27.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction seeks permissiontowithdrawthiswritapplication, asthegrievancesofthe petitionerhavebeenredressedandsliphasalsobeenfiledtothateffect, whichiskeptonrecord. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (ApareshKumarSingh,J) jk...
Manoj Kumar Bhagat Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 109 of 2013 Manoj Kumar Bhagat ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the C.B.I. : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, J.C. to ASGI ----- 10/27.08.2013 Let this case be posted on 30.8.2013 so that the C.B.I. may substantiate his case that the invoice, which has been annexed as Annexure-A to the supplementary counter affidavit, is the document given by the petitioner to M/s P.K.S. & Company upon which M/s P.K.S. & Company had withdrawn money. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner- Manoj Kumar Bhagat in connection with R.C. 08(A)/2010 pending in the court of 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, C.B.I., Dhanbad. Let this order be communicated through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. (R.R. Prasad, J.) AKT...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »