Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Kumar Vs. Geeta Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI FirstAppealNo.22of2012 With I.A.No.949of2012 SanjayKumar .... .... .... Appellant Versus GeetaDevi .... .... ....Respondent CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant :Mr.AnilKumarSinha,Advocate FortheRespondent : st OrderNo.06 Dated,31 July,2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheappellant. In view of the reasons stated in the interlocutory application,thedelayinfilingofthisFirstAppealiscondoned,and theI.A.No.949of2012standsdisposedof. ListthiscaseforAdmissionaftertwoweeks. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
Arun Kumar Singh and ors Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4635 of 2013 with I.A. no.5395 o1. Arun Kumar Singh 2. Sanjay Kumar 3. Jitendra Nath 4. Kamlesh Kumar Pathak 5. Ravi Shankar Kumar 6. Vijay Kumar Tiwari 7. Amendra Kumar Sinha 8. Sanaullah Khan 9. Shachindra Kumar Tiwary 10.Vijay Kumar Singh 11.Krishna Murari Pandey . Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioners : Mr.Amit Kr.Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C.III ----- 2/31.07.2013 In I.A. no.5395 of 2013, the petitioners have prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) NO.4635 of 2013 in terms of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(S) no.2194 of 2013{Ravindra Kumar Ojha & Ors. Vrs. State of Jahrkhand & Ors.}. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the State, submitted that the writ petition itself can be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid case. In the writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direc...
Raj Kumar Pandit Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 347 of 2013 --- Raj Kumar Pandit ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & anr. .....Respondents. --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Vishal Kishore Prasad, Adv. 04/31.7.2013 Learned counsel for the respondent- State prayed for and is allowed one week time to file the counter affidavit. However, if the counter affidavit is not filed by the Respondents-State by the next one week, the respondent no.3, Block Development Officer, Godda, Jharkhand shall appear in person. Let the case appear on 12th August, 2013. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) jk...
Bimla Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2261 of 2013. ----- 1. Bimala Devi 2. Sarita Devi Petitioners. Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Kali Charan Verma Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri A.K.Jha For the State : Sri Prem Prakash, A.P.P. ----- 03/31.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Bimala Devi and Sarita Devi is moved by Sri A.K.Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri Prem Prakash, Addl.P.P. for the State. It appears that allegation against these petitioners are similar to co-accused Saroj Kumar Rawani @ Saroj Ramani @ Saroj Rawani. Aforeaid co-accused has been granted regular bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.2.2012 in B.A.No. 722/2012. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance and also taking into account that both the petitioners are female, I allow this application and direct the petitioners, named above, to surrender in the court below by 14/08/20...
Anni Murmu Vs. Welfare
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 4662 of 2013 Sudama Singh ...... Petitioner Vs. Coal India Limited & Ors. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Sahani For the Respondent: M/s Ananda Sen & Md. M. Khan. Order No. 02 ------ Dated 31st July, 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that defects would be removed in course of the day. It is further submitted that in identical matters, the Court has admitted several writ petitions and also granted interim relief. In view of above reasons, the petitioner may remove the defects in course of the day and list this case along with W.P.(T) No. 3087 of 2013. Meanwhile operation of the communication dated 7th May, 2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioner is hereby stayed. It is made clear that in case petitioner fail in the writ petition then they shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to t...
Prahlad Giri Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2506 of 2013. ----- Prahlad Giri Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri R.P.Singh For the State : Sri Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. ----- 03/31.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Prahlad Giri is moved by Sri R.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Shekhar Sinha, Addl.P.P. for the State. It is alleged that deceased herself put fire on her body due to hot telephonic conversation with petitioner on mobile phone. But from F.I.R. it is clear that on the date of occurrence, mobile phone of the petitioner was in possession of Shiv Kumar Giri, cousin brother of informant. Under the said circumstance, the allegation made against this petitioner does not inspire confidence. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court be...
Hira Lal Manjhi Alias Lalo Manjhi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5468 of 2013 Hira Lal Manjhi @ Lalo Manjhi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 2/ 31.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 399, 402, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 3, 4 of the Explosive Substance Act, in connection with B.T. P.S. Case No. 60 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 477 of 2010, S.T. Case no. 304 of 2011. From the FIR, it is apparent that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot, rather, he was named by the apprehended co-accused. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Hira Lal Manjhi @ Lalo Manjhi, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is ...
Lal Mohammad Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5529 of 2013 ------- Lal Mohmod @ Lal Mohammad Khan . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Nilesh Kumar For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sikidiri P.S. Case No. 07 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 714 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 498A, 341, 323/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case was instituted on the basis of the complaint petition which was sent for institution of the police case. There is allegation against the petitioner to have subjected his wife to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry and to have threatened to marry another girl. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Lal Mohmod @ Lal Moham...
Lakshmi Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5737of2013 LakshmiSao Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.B.M.Tripathi,Sr.Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/31.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It reveals that petitioner has been prosecuted for causing torture and treatingtheinformantwithcrueltyforwantofmoredowry. Itisalsoalleged thatthepetitionerandotheraccusedtriedtokilltheinformantbutsomehow she saved herself due to intervention of his brother Dhiraj. It is further disclosedthatthehusbandishavingillicitrelationwithanotherlady. Itissubmittedthatpetitionerisfatherinlawandheisincustodysince 06.05.2013.Asamatteroffactthiscasehasbeeninstitutedonlybecausethe informantisnothappywithherconjugallifeandshehassuspicioninhermind thatherhusbandishavingillicitrelationwithanotherlady. Learnedcounselappearingfortheinformantopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringfactsandcircumstances,matrimonialnatureoftheoffence aswellasdetentiono...
Smt Chamola Singh and ors Vs. Shri Ravindranath Kahali and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 16 of 2013 Smt. Chamola Singh & Ors. .... .. Appellants Versus Shri Ravindranath Kahali & Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Appellant : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. For the respondents : - -- 4/31.07.2013 Learned counsel Mr. Baleshwar Yadav states that he has received instruction to appear on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 mentioned in the cause title. He has already filed vakalatnama on their behalf. According to him other respondents are performa respondents. Put up this case after one week, so as to enable the learned counsel for the respondents to file counter affidavit, if any. In the meantime, ad interim order passed earlier shall continue, till the next date of listing. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) Saket/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »