Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anni Murmu Vs. Welfare

Anni Murmu vs Welfare

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 31, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008758

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anni Murmu

Respondent

Welfare

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(t) no. 4662 of 2013 sudama singh ...... petitioner vs. coal india limited & ors. respondents ------ coram: hon'ble the chief justice hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy ------ for the petitioner: mr. a.k. sahani for the respondent: m/s ananda sen & md. m. khan. order no. 02 ------ dated 31st july, 2013 learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that defects would be removed in course of the day. it is further submitted that in identical matters, the court has admitted several writ petitions and also granted interim relief. in view of above reasons, the petitioner may remove the defects in course of the day and list this case along with w.p.(t) no. 3087 of 2013. meanwhile operation of the communication dated 7th may, 2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioner is hereby stayed. it is made clear that in case petitioner fail in the writ petition then they shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to the concerned taxing authority. list this case under the heading for admission. (prakash tatia, c j) (jaya roy, j) alankar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 4662 of 2013 Sudama Singh ...... Petitioner Vs. Coal India Limited & Ors. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Sahani For the Respondent: M/s Ananda Sen & Md. M. Khan. Order No. 02 ------ Dated 31st July, 2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that defects would be removed in course of the day. It is further submitted that in identical matters, the Court has admitted several writ petitions and also granted interim relief. In view of above reasons, the petitioner may remove the defects in course of the day and list this case along with W.P.(T) No. 3087 of 2013. Meanwhile operation of the communication dated 7th May, 2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioner is hereby stayed. It is made clear that in case petitioner fail in the writ petition then they shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to the concerned taxing authority. List this case under the heading for admission. (Prakash Tatia, C J) (Jaya Roy, J) Alankar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial