Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CivilReviewNo.92of2011 with W.P .(T)No.2843of2010 with W.P .(T)No.2611of2010 CentralCoalfieldsLtd. .....Petitioner (inallcases) Versus StateofJharkhandandors. ....Oppositeparties (inallcases) CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL .... ForthePetitioner :Mr.B.Poddar,Adv. FortheRespondents :Mr.RajeshShankar,G.A.& Mr.DelipJerath,Adv. Orderno.8 Dated29th July,2013 1. Since the Hon'ble Supreme Court has directed vide order dated23rdAugust,2011toheartheapplicationonmerit,the matterrequiresconsideration.2. Postthesemattersaftertwoweeks. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (D.N.Patel,J) G.Jha/...
Solar Smokeless Fuels P Ltd Through Its Director Birendra Kumar Singh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3449 of 2013 --- Solar Smokeless Fuels (P) Ltd --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus Central Coalfields Ltd & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocate For the CCL: Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate --- I.A. No. 5345/2013 --- 05/ 29.07.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition for which the instant I.A. has also been filed. It is submitted that inadvertently, some error has occurred in the name of the writ petitioner itself. Therefore, it may be permitted to file the writ application with the original name. With the aforesaid liberty, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. also stands disposed of. In view of this order, earlier I.A.s being I.A. Nos. 3829/13 4800/13 and 5127/13 stand dismissed. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/...
Parbati Devi Vs. Dharamraj Pandit
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tr. Petition (Civil) No. 21 of 2013 Parbati Devi @ Parbati Pandit .... .. Petitioner Versus Dharamraj Pandit ...... Opp. Party --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : M/s. Ganesh Pathak, Onkar Nath Tiwary, Adv. For the Opp. Party : - -- 3/29.07.2013 Petitioner by way of filing the present petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking transfer of Title Mat. Suit No.09 of 2013 from the court of learned Principal Judge, Family court, Dhanbad to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Deoghar. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on perusal of material placed on record, issue urgent show cause notice to opposite party by registered post with A/D as well as ordinary process, for which requisites etc. must be filed by within one week. The returnable date of notice is 27.08.2013. In the mean time, further proceeding with regard to Title Mat. Suit No.09 of 2013, pending be...
Mangal Soren Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.4110of2013 MangalSoren Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.SanatKumarJha,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/29.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Itappearsthattheinformant,afterleavinghertwomonthschild,had gonetowashutensilstoanearbypond.Whenshereturned,shefoundsaltin themouthofhersonandfrothwascomingoutandwithinnotimethechild died.Thehusband,whoispetitioner,hasadmittedthatduetomistakehehad givensalttotheboy. Itissubmittedthatpetitionerisfatherofthedeceasedboyandtherewas noreasonforhimtokillhisownson. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Considering the facts and circumstances, above named petitioner is directedtobereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(Rupees TenThousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof theCourtoflearnedChiefJudicialMagistrate,PakurinconnectionwithPakur (T)P.S.CaseNo.31of2013correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo....
Gardi Soy Alias Rohit Soy and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4349 of 2013 ------- 1. Gardi Soy @ Rohit Soy 2. Baburam Haiburi . Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioners : : M/s. Pravin Kumar For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 3/ 29.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Muffasil (Pandrashali) P.S. Case No. 72 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 380 of 2012, for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a) / 26 / 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioners were apprehended on 20.8.2012 alongwith a motorcycle and from the possession of the petitioners country made pistols and cartridges were recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, Gardi Soy @ Rohit Soy & Baburam Haiburi, are directed to be rel...
Mahendra Singh and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4510 o1. Mahendra Singh 2. Priyanka Kumari @ Priyanka Singh... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Sahani For the State: Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 2, APP For the O.P. No. 2 Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh 4/29.07.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Mahendra Singh and Priyanka Kumari @ Priyanka Singh is moved by Sri A.K. Sahani and opposed by Sri Manoj Kumar No. 2, learned Additional P.P. and Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. At the out set, Sri A.K. Sahani learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 is ready to keep the informant ( O.P. No.2) as his wife with all honour and dignity and for that purpose he is ready to give written undertaking in the court below. Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 submits that the informant is also ready to reside with the petitioner no. 1 as his wi...
Gunjan Kumar Mehta Alias Gunjan Mehta Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 2122 of 2013 ------- Gunjan Kumar Mehta @ Gunjan Mehta . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Anil Kumar For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 5/ 29.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 77 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1871 of 2012, S.T. No. 560 of 2012, for the offence under Sections 395 / 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to dacoity and the case was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement and has prayed for bail. The impugned order also shows that there is nothing specific against the petitioner. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to rele...
Punit Sao Alias Punni Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2008 of 2013 Punit Sao @ Punni Sao .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Sushil Dwivedi For the State: Mr. G.S. Prasad ,APP 3/29.07.2013: This application has been filed for modification of order dated 15.7.2013 passed in ABA No. 1933 of 2013 by this Court. It is stated that due to clerical mistake,it was wrongly mentioned in the anticipatory bail application that the case is pending before learned Sessions Judge, Koderma. It is submitted that in fact the case is pending before learned S.D.J.M., Koderma. In view of the aforesaid submission, the order dated 15.7.2013 passed in ABA No. 1933 of 2013 is hereby modified and it is ordered that in the said order in place of Sessions Judge, Koderma, S.D.J.M., Koderma be read. The date of surrender is also extended by 12.08.2013. With the aforesaid modification, this application is disposed of. (...
Praveen Chandra Gupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 1440 of 2013 with A.B.A.No. 1349 of 2013 ----- Praveen Chandra Gupta Petitioner in ABA 1440/2013.1. Mukesh Barnwal @ Mukesh Modi 2. Babita Devi 3. Binita Devi @ Vinita Kumari @ Babli Devi 4. Nitin Chandra Gupta @ Nitu Chandra Gupta Petitioners in ABA1349/13. Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Laxmi Devi Opposite Parties. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri Sachin Kumar For the State : Sri V.K. Tiwary, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Sri K.P. Deo ----- 04/29.07.2013. Both the applications arose from same F.I.R. thus are heard together and disposed of by this order. Anticipatory bail application filed by Praveen Chandra Gupta, Mukesh Barnwal @ Mukesh Modi, Babita Devi, Binita Devi @ Vinita Kumari @ Babli Devi and Nitin Chandra Gupta @ Nitu Chandra Gupta is moved by Sri Sachin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri V.K. Tiwary, Addl.P.P. for the State and Sri K.P. D...
Bhagwat Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1697 o1. Bhagwat Yadav 2. Prakash Yadav 3. Kameshwar Yadav 4. Kumeshwar Yadav 5. Guneshwar Yadav 6.Kaleshwar Mahto @ Kaleshwar Yadav 7. Bhagwan Yadav 8. Jitu Yadav @ Jadav...............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand ........................... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. Arbind Kumar Choudhary For the State :A.P.P 5.29.7.13. The order dated 22.12.2008 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in Mohanpur P.S case no.149 of 2005 under which cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 3/ 4 of the Explosive Substance Act has been taken against the petitioners is being sought to be quashed on the ground that earlier the petitioners were put on trial for the said offence as well as for the offences under the Indian Penal Code. In that case, the petitioners were acquitted of the charge under Section 3/ 4 of the Explosive Substance Act though the petitione...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »