Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tata Yodogawa Limited Through Its Company Secretary Sri Prashant Kumar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3749 of 2013 --- Tata Yodogawa Ltd. .................Petitioner -Versus- Jharkhand State Electricity Board & others .....Respondents. --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. M.S.Mittal, Sr. Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Adv. -- 03/29.7.2013 Let the counter affidavit said to have been filed on 24th July, 2013 be placed on the record along with rejoinder filed by learned counsel for the petitioner on 27th July, 2013. As prayed for, let the matter appear after three weeks. In the meantime, the interim order dated 2.7.2013 shall continue till further orders. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) jk...
Anil Kr Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 326 of 2013 Anil Kr. Yadav Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Kumar For the Respondent: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 04/Dated: July, 29, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This criminal appeal has already been admitted by this Court on 13 th June, 2013. Records and proceeding of Sessions Trial No.55 of 2011 was called for from the trial so as to appreciate the argument of suspension of sentence on behalf of the appellant-accused.2) This Court has received the record and proceedings of the trial Court and we have perused the same.3) Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the evidences on record, there is a prima facie case in favour of the appellant- accused. Prima facie there is a lot of improvement in the case of the prosecution by the prosecution witnesses. Moreover, th...
Ejajul Rahman and Others Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1579 o1. Ejajul Rahman 2. Irfan Miyan @ Md. Irfan 3. Ashfaque Miyan @ Asfak Alam 4. Anjar Miyan @ Anjan Alam ... ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi For the State : Mr. V.K. Tiwary, A.P.P. ........ 4/29.07.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Ejajul Rahman, Irfan Miyan @ Md. Irfan, Ashfaque Miyan @ Asfak Alam and Anjar Miyan @ Anjan Alam in connection with Bero P.S. Case No. 48 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 1634 of 2013 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi is moved by Sri A.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri V.K. Tiwary, learned Additional PP. for the State. It is alleged that petitioners in league with co-accused Manjar Miyan kidnapped informant's daughter with a view to solemnized her marriage. Thus, I am not inclined to enlarge...
Md Akhtar and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2105 of 2013 Md. Anwar @ Md. Anwar Alam Versus The State of Jharkhand with B. A. No. 4007 o1. Md. Akhtar 2. Md. Jamil @ Sk. Jamil Versus The State of Jharkhand -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : M/s K.P. Deo & D.K. Dubey, Advocates For the State : A.P.P. -------- 3/ 29.07.2013 Both these bail applications arise out of the same case and as such, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 395, 396 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Lalmatiya P.S. Case No. 80 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1469 of 2012. The case relates to dacoity, in which, Haiwa vehicle was taken away by the culprits after committing murder of the driver of the vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the pe...
Kartik Rana Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4124 of 2013 ------- Kartik Rana . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Dilip Kr. Karmakar For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 4/ 29.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Baharagora (Barsole) P.S. Case No.15 of 2011, corresponding to G.R No.107 of 2011, S.T. No. 58 of 2012, for the offence under Sections 302 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the father father-in-law of the deceased and though the marriage had taken place about 19 years ago, but it appears that the deceased was being tortured and assaulted by her husband due to which the deceased used to live at her parent's place. On 8.3.2011 there was a panchayati between the parties in which the petitioner and his son agreed to keep her properly and thereaft...
District Bar Association Gumla Through Its President Swarup Kumar Vs. ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 729 of 2012 District Bar Association, Gumla Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and others ... ... ... Opp. Parties ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. In Person For the Respondents: J.C. to A.A.G. ------ 14/Dated: July, 29, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) Counsel for the State seeks time to file progress report.2) Time, as prayed for, is granted.3) Matter is adjourned to be enlisted on 31st July, 2013.4) If no affidavit is filed on or before the next date of hearing, ,we hereby, direct the Engineer-in-Chief, Jharkhand, Ranchi, or his such other responsible high-ranking officer who is well conversant with the facts of the case, to remain physically present before this Court on the next date of hearing at 10.30 a.m.5) If the affidavit and report is filed, there is no need of presence of any of the officer. (D. N. Patel, J) (S. Chandrashekhar, J) Manoj/c...
MomIn Alias Bablu Khalifa Alias MobIn Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6195 of 2013 Momin @ Bablu Khalifa @ Mobin ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Devesh Krishna, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 29.07.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail application. This bail application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Let this order be communicated to the Court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....
Amdius Beck Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.2437 of 2013 Amdius Beck . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P.Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to G.P.VI ----- I.A. no.5072 o2. 29.07.2013 In this application, the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) no.2437 of 2013 in terms of the order passed in in W.P.(S) no.3910 of 2012[Prabhaker Kumar & Anr. Vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.]. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter involved in the writ petition is entirely similar to the matter involved in W.P.(S) no.3910 of 2012 and, as such, the writ petition be disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned J.C. to G.P.VI, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has not disputed the said contentions and submitted that the writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.(S) no.3910 of 2012. Considering the above, this applicat...
Tejo Das and Others Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2011 o1. Tejo Das 2. Kamal Das 3. Suganti Devi ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 29.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed for modification of order dated 8.7.2013 passed in B.A. No. 3071 of 2013 stating that S.T. number was wrongly mentioned in the bail application and the same error has crept in the said order dated 8.7.2013. It is submitted that correct S.T. number is 'S.T. No. 58 of 2013' and accordingly, the order dated 8.7.2013 passed in B.A. No. 3071 of 2013 be modified. In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let S.T. number in order dated 8.7.2013 passed in B.A. No. 3071 of 2013 be read as 'S.T. No. 58 of 2013' at the place of 'S.T....
Rajan Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1676 of 2012 Rajan Choudhary .............................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another....Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the State :A.P.P 5.29.7.13. Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or disposed of, at the admission stage itself, for which requisites under registered cover with A/D must be filed by 1.8.2013. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, further proceeding of Complaint Case No.538 of 2011, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi shall remain stayed so far the petitioner is concerned. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »