imran Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand

imran Khan vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 30, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008020

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1008020
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jul 30, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

imran Khan

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....to the condition that petitioner shall produce a certificate issued by a nationalized bank to show that he has fixed deposited rs. 50,000/- in the name of his son for 10 years. it is submitted that the petitioner is in custody and informant who is ex-wife of petitioner, has not cooperated and because of that petitioner could not furnish the fixed deposit certificate and therefore he is still in custody. accordingly, it is submitted that the petitioner may be enlarged on provisional bail so that he can deposit the aforesaid amount as per the direction of this court and furnish the certificate in the court below. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, i allow this application and modify the order dated 28.09.2012 passed in ba no. 6945 of 2012 in the following manner:- the court below shall grant provisional bail to the petitioner for one month, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, ranchi in connection with dhurwa ( tupudana) p.s. case no. 46 of 2012 ( g.r. no. 1166 of 2012). petitioner is directed to deposit rs. 50,000/- in the name of his son born out of wed lock of petitioner and informant, for 10 years and produce certificate in the court below regarding the same. if the aforesaid certificate is filed in the court below, the court below will confirm the bail of the petitioner. informant is directed to cooperate with the petitioner in getting the aforesaid amount fixed deposited in the name of her son. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1360 of 2013 Imran Khan .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan Mr. Asif Khan For the State: Mr. S.K. Dubey,APP 3/30.07.2013: This application has been filed for modification of order dated 28.09.2012 passed in B.A. No. 6945 of 2012 ( Annexure-1). It appears that by the said order, petitioner has been granted regular bail subject to the condition that petitioner shall produce a certificate issued by a Nationalized Bank to show that he has fixed deposited Rs. 50,000/- in the name of his son for 10 years. It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody and informant who is ex-wife of petitioner, has not cooperated and because of that petitioner could not furnish the fixed deposit certificate and therefore he is still in custody. Accordingly, it is submitted that the petitioner may be enlarged on provisional bail so that he can deposit the aforesaid amount as per the direction of this Court and furnish the certificate in the court below. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and modify the order dated 28.09.2012 passed in BA No. 6945 of 2012 in the following manner:- The court below shall grant provisional bail to the petitioner for one month, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Dhurwa ( Tupudana) P.S. Case No. 46 of 2012 ( G.R. No. 1166 of 2012). Petitioner is directed to deposit Rs. 50,000/- in the name of his son born out of wed lock of petitioner and informant, for 10 years and produce certificate in the court below regarding the same. If the aforesaid certificate is filed in the court below, the court below will confirm the bail of the petitioner. Informant is directed to cooperate with the petitioner in getting the aforesaid amount fixed deposited in the name of her son. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties imran Khan vs State of Jharkhand Same Subject Land Acquisition