Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Joseph Ekka Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3945 of 2013 Joseph Ekka ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Yadav, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 18.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bishunpur P.S. Case No. 37 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 923 of 2009, S.T No.239 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 302, 326, 427 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Section 17 of the CLA Act, Section 13 (i) of the U.P.A Act and Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. There was an encounter between the police party and the extremists group, in which, Anti Land Mines Vehicle was blown up by the extremists and there was heavy exchange of fire between the police party and the extremists, in which, three police personnel ...
Sukumar Ghosh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.346 of 2008 Sukumar Ghosh ...................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand ..................... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Choudhary For the State : A.P.P 8.20.6.13. A case was lodged by the informant-petitioner for commission of offence under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. On submission of the charge sheet, cognizance of the offences was taken against the accused persons, who were put on trial. During trial, private witnesses were examined by the prosecution but when A.P.P did not took any serious effort to secure attendance of the Investigating Officer and the Doctor, an application was filed before the court for removing the said A.P.P from the case so that new A.P.P be assigned with the case. However, no order could be passed .Thereupon, suddenly the court closed the evidence of the prosecution. Being aggrieved with that or...
Union of India, Ministry of La Vs. Gautam Dey and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P(S)No.6673of2010 UnionofIndiaVs.GautamDey&Ors. CORAM: HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant/Petitioner:Mr.PrabhashKumar FortheRespondentNo.1:Mr.M.A.Khan FortheRespondentNo.2&3:JCtoMr.RamNivasRoy Dated20 th June,2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. The applicantrespondent no.1 approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Circuit Bench at Ranchi, by filing O.A No.168/2004byimpleadingUnionofIndiaaspartyalongwithother authoritiesoftheRailwaysalsoasparty.ThesaidO.Awasallowed, videorderdated9th January,2007.ThatorderoftheTribunalwas challengedbypreferringwritpetitionbeforethisCourtbytheUnion ofIndiaandthattoo through SeniorDivisionalPersonnelOfficer, EastCentralRailwaysbyfilingW.P(C)No.5026/2007,whichwas dismissed, vide judgment dated 4th October, 2007, and Division BenchofthisCourtentertainedthepleaoftheappellantUnionof IndiathattheTribunalhasdirectedtopasstheorderofrelaxationby the General Manager of East Central Railways...
Employees Provident Fund Organization Through Its Assistant Provident ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CompanyAppealNo.2of2013 EmployeesProvidentFundOrganization, RegionalOffice,Karamtoli,Ranchi ........Appellant Versus M/sRefractorySpecialties(IND)Ltd. Jamtara,Dumkaandors. ......Respondents CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMRSJUSTICEJAYAROY .... FortheAppellant :M/sP .P.N.Roy,Sr.Adv.&BananiVerma,Adv. FortheRespondents :Mr.H.K.Mehta,Adv. Mr.M.Khan,ASGI Orderno.2 Dated20 th June,2013 1. Learnedcounselfortheappellantsubmittedthatsomedefects havealreadybeenremoved.Sofarotherdefectsareconcerned,the sameareignored.2. Admit.3. Sincetherespondentshavealreadyappeared,nonoticeneed beissued.4. Meanwhile,operationoftheimpugnedorderdated26thApril, 2013shallremainstayed. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J) G.Jha/...
Md Imtiyaz and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 470 of 2013 Md. Imtiyaz & Others ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Saibal Kumar Laik, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 20.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 21.5.2013 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Spl.F.T.C., Dhanbad in Sessions Trial No. 72 of 2006, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for further cross-examination on the basis of compromise between the parties, has been rejected. It is informed that tomorrow is the date fixed in the case. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the order dated 21.5.2013 passed by the Court below in Sessions Trial No. 72 of 2006. This criminal revision is, accordingly, dismissed. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.K...
Ranjan Kumar Vs. State Bank of India and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
W.P.(S) No. 6444 of 2003 --- In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. --- Ranjan Kumar --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus State Bank of India through its General Manager, Judges Court Road, Patna & others --- --- --- --- Respondents --- For the Petitioner: M/s Rajendra Krishna, Ashok Kr.Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents:M/s. Rajesh Kumar, Amit Kumar and Manindra Kumar Sinha, Advocates --- PRESENT The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- By Court: Heard counsel for the parties.2. By order dated 8th September 2000 (Annexure-13) issued by the Assistant General Manager (IV)-cum-Disciplinary Authority, the petitioner who was the clerk-cum-cashier in the State Bank of India attached at Jhumari Telaiya Branch, has been dismissed from service. His appeal preferred before the respondent no. 2-the Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Ranchi, has also been rejected by the order dated 14th May 2002. These two orders are under challen...
Manoranjan Prasad Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.243 of 2011 Manoranjan Prasad Sinha................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another. Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.Manoj Tandan For the State : A.P.P 14.20.6.13. I.A.No.3756 of 2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on an interlocutory application bearing no.3756 of 2013. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this application has been filed for quashing of the FIR of Dhurwa P.S. Case no.41 of 2008. During pendency of this application, charge sheet was submitted. Upon which cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 3/ 4 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been taken against the petitioner. Subsequent to that, on an application filed for discharge, an order has been passed on 15.5.2013 whereby prayer for discharge has been rejected and therefore...
Md Samshad Alias Md Samshad Sheikh and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2194 of 2013. ----- 1. Md. Samshad @ Md. Samshad Sheikh 2. Rehana Bibi Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri. S.K.Deo For the State : Md. Hatim, A.P.P. ----- 02/20.06.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Md. Samshad @ Md. Samshad Sheikh and Rehana Bibi is moved by Sri. S.K.Deo , learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Md. Hatim , Addl P.P. for the State. This is a case under section 498(A) of the I.P.C. Petitioner no.1 is elder brother-in-law of the complainant whereas petitioner no.2 is married sister-in-law of the complainant. From perusal of complaint petition, I find that there is general and omnibus allegations against these petitioners that they have assaulted complainant for demand of dowry. No specific overt act alleged against them. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this applica...
Dharamraj Singh Alias Dharamraj Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1571 of 2013 Dharamraj Singh @ Dharamraj Kumar .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Pran Pranay For the State: Ms. Anita Sinha, APP 4/20.06.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Bibash Kishor Jha Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(PIL)No.1103of2013 BibashKishoreJha .... .... .... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand&Ors. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.AnupKumarMehta,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.SohailAnwar,A.G. th OrderNo.04 Dated,20 June,2013 The grievance of the writ petitioner is that about 92 students of Gope Bandhu High School, Hamanda PO. & P.S. Rajnagar,Distt.Seraikala,Kharsawanhasbeendeniedopportunity to appear in the ensuing matriculation examination which were scheduled to be held on 22.02.2013. Before this Court learned counsel for the Jharkhand Academic Council on 20.02.2013 informed that the Jharkhand Academic Council has given Admit Card to only 258 students. Learned counsel for the petitioner in rejoinderhasplacedonrecordthelistof343studentsandthatlist isofJharkhandAcademicCouncil. However,thenoticeswereissuedtotheschoolbyorder dated 20.02.2013 and the said school has filed the counter an...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »