Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md Imtiyaz and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Md Imtiyaz and ors vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 20, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972772

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md Imtiyaz and ors

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. revision no. 470 of 2013 md. imtiyaz & others ..... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand .. opposite party -------- coram : honble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr. saibal kumar laik, advocate for the state : a.p.p. ------ 2/ 20.06.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned a.p.p. for the state. the petitioners have challenged the order dated 21.5.2013 passed by learned addl. sessions judge-vi-cum-spl.f.t.c., dhanbad in sessions trial no. 72 of 2006, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under section 311 cr.p.c. for further cross-examination on the basis of compromise between the parties, has been rejected. it is informed that tomorrow is the date fixed in the case. in that view of the matter, i am not inclined to interfere with the order dated 21.5.2013 passed by the court below in sessions trial no. 72 of 2006. this criminal revision is, accordingly, dismissed. ( h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 470 of 2013 Md. Imtiyaz & Others ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Saibal Kumar Laik, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 20.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 21.5.2013 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Spl.F.T.C., Dhanbad in Sessions Trial No. 72 of 2006, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for further cross-examination on the basis of compromise between the parties, has been rejected. It is informed that tomorrow is the date fixed in the case. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the order dated 21.5.2013 passed by the Court below in Sessions Trial No. 72 of 2006. This criminal revision is, accordingly, dismissed. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial