Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tourif Azmi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 806 of 2013 Tousif Azmi .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Suman Tripathy For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 17.06.2013 The petitioner as well as the complainant are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre, Civil Court, Seraikella, on 24.6.2013. The Mediator/Conciliator shall make all efforts to settle the matter between the parties and thereafter send the result of conciliation to this Court . Put up this case under the same heading after receipt of the aforesaid report on 01.07.2013. Till the next date, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner in connection with Ichagarh PS case no. 29 of 2012 pending in the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Seraikella. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)...
Uma Shankar Lal Alias Chotu Alias Umashankar Vs. the State of Jharkhan ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3873 of 2013 Uma Shankar Lal @ Chotu @ Umashankar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Birat Kumar For the State :A. P.P. ----- 3/17.6.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 420, 468, 467, 371, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 of the Arms Act in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1008 of 2012 arising out of Tamar P.S. Case No. 85 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 5090 of 2012. From the F.I.R., it appears that the petitioner was apprehended on 13.09.2012 and from the possession of the petitioner one country made pistol loaded with five cartridges were recovered and some mobile phones, I.D cards and Driving Licence were also recovered from the petitioner which were found to be forged. It also appears that the petitioner had...
Surendra Kumar Sobati Alias Surchandra Sobti Alias Surchandra Kumar an ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2362 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 1718 of 2013 Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Mahto ..........Petitioner(in ABA 2362/13) 1. Surendra Kumar Sobati @ Surchandra Sobti @ Surchandra Kumar 2.Rohtas Sharma @ Rophtas Sharma ........Petitioners ( in ABA 1718/13) Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite parties ( in both cases) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. S.P. Roy ( in ABA 2362/13) Mr. Amresh Kumar (in ABA 1718/13) For the State: Mr. S.S. Sahay, APP ( in ABA 2362/13) Mr. Tapas Roy, APP (in ABA 1718/13) 3/17.06.2013: Both the Anticipatory bail applications heard together as they arose from the same FIR. Anticipatory bail applications filed by petitioners Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Mahto and Surendra Kumar Sobati @ Surchandra Sobti @ Surchandra Kumar and Rohtas Sharma @ Rophtas Sharma are moved by Sri S.P.Roy and Sri Amresh Kumar respectively and opposed by Sri S.S. Sahay and Sri Tapas Roy, learned Additional P.Ps...
Banwari Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2587 of 2013 Banwari Mahto ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Suchendra Prasad, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 17.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 384 and 386 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Mandu (W.B.) P.S. Case No. 303 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 4579 of 2012. The case relates to demand of levy from a particular mobile phone and the case was instituted against owner of the said mobile. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the said mobile phone has not been recovered from the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail, but upon going through the ca...
Lakhan Sao Alias Ram Lakhan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2574 of 2013 Lakhan Sao @ Ram Lakhan Sao ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashwini Kr. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 17.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No. 239 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 4743 of 2012. The petitioner was apprehended on 6.12.2012 and from his possession, one pistol loaded with two cartridges have been recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Lakhan Sao @ Ram Lakhan Sao, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount ...
Umesh Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1120 of 2013 Umesh Mahato .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 17.06.2013 This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioner in connection with Ramgarh PS case No. 329 of 2012 pending in the court of CJM, Hazaribagh. After some arguments, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to the petitioner to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail. This application, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for . Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)...
Mangri HarIn Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.2062 of 2012 Mangri Harin ...................................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another.............Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. K.P.Deo 2/ 17.6.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Mohit Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 55 of 2013 Mohit Kumar Singh Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Mr. A.B. Mahata For the Respondent: Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 06/Dated: June, 17, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the judgment of the trial Court, this appeal is ADMITTED.2) Records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 01 of 2004 / S.T.R. No.02 of 2004 is called for from the trial Court (Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-V, CHaibasa) so as to reach this Court to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence on or before the next date of hearing.3) Matter is adjourned to be enlisted on 8th July, 2013.4) Registry is directed get the paper book prepared with neatly typed copies of depositions of prosecution witnesses and their evidences on record as required und...
Maqbul Ahmad Khan Vs. Pawan Kumar Sao
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI. W.P(C) No2862 of 2007 Maqbul Ahmad Khan.................................. Petitioner Versus Pawan Kumar Sao .................. Respondent CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner :- Mr.V.Shivnath Sr.Adv. For the Respondent :- Mr. B.K. Dubey Adv. 5/17.6.2013. The present petitioner by way of filing this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for quashing the order dated 19.4.2007 passed by the court of Sub-ordinate Judge No. II at Koderma in Eviction suit no. 7 of 2004 whereby the prayer of the petitioner made in the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code for amendment in the plaint has been rejected. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. Perused the impugned order as well as other materials placed on record It appears that application under order-6 rule 17 of CPC has be...
Vijay Beck Alias Vijay Beg Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2232 of 2013 Vijay Beck @ Vijay Beg .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Ravi Prakash For the State: Mr. Amitabh, APP 2/17.06.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »