Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohit Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Mohit Kumar Singh vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 17, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972595

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohit Kumar Singh

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. appeal (db) no. 55 of 2013 mohit kumar singh appellant versus the state of jharkhand ... ... ... respondent ------ coram: hon'ble mr. justice d. n. patel hon'ble mr. justice s. chandrashekhar ----- for the appellant: mr. a.b. mahata for the respondent: mr. v.s. sahay, a.p.p. ------ 06/dated: june, 17, 2013 per d.n. patel, j1) having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the judgment of the trial court, this appeal is admitted.2) records and proceedings of sessions trial no. 01 of 2004 / s.t.r. no.02 of 2004 is called for from the trial court (addl. sessions judge, fast track court-v, chaibasa) so as to reach this court to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence on or before the next date of hearing.3) matter is adjourned to be enlisted on 8th july, 2013.4) registry is directed get the paper book prepared with neatly typed copies of depositions of prosecution witnesses and their evidences on record as required under sections 190 and 191 of the high court of jharkhand rules, 2001. (d. n. patel, j) (s. chandrashekhar, j) manoj/cp.3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 55 of 2013 Mohit Kumar Singh Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Mr. A.B. Mahata For the Respondent: Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 06/Dated: June, 17, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J

1) Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the judgment of the trial Court, this appeal is ADMITTED.

2) Records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 01 of 2004 / S.T.R. No.02 of 2004 is called for from the trial Court (Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-V, CHaibasa) so as to reach this Court to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence on or before the next date of hearing.

3) Matter is adjourned to be enlisted on 8th July, 2013.

4) Registry is directed get the paper book prepared with neatly typed copies of depositions of prosecution witnesses and their evidences on record as required under Sections 190 and 191 of the High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001. (D. N. Patel, J) (S. Chandrashekhar, J) Manoj/cp.3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial