Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajit Marandi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 1701 of 2013. ----- 1. Ajit Marandi 2. Narayan Marandi Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri Anand Kr. Sinha For the State : Smt. Anita Sinha, A.P.P. ----- 03/18.06.2013. It is alleged that petitioners, who are President and Secretary of Taljhari Lamps had misappropriated 630.05 quintals of Paddy. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the said paddy is still lying in the godown of Taljhari Lamps and key of the said godown is with the petitioners. It is further submitted that informant, without making any physical verification, has lodged present First Information Report. Under the said circumstance, I direct to Superintendent of Police, Sahebganj to make physical verification of the said godown personally, in presence of petitioners and report this Court as to whether 630.05 quintals of paddy is still lying i...
Shantanu Kumar Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 495 of 2012 Shantanu Kumar Choudhary ... Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand & others ... Respondents With L.P.A. No. 515 of 2012 Shantanu Kumar Choudhary ... Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand & others ... Respondents With L.P.A. No. 438 of 2012 State of Jharkhand & others ... Appellant Versus Savitri Devi & Others ... Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. V.shivnath, Sr. Advocate. ------ Order No. 09 Dated 18th June, 2013 Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he has filed rejoinder today. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has not received a copy. Learned counsel for the petitioner may give a copy of the rejoinder to the counsel for the respondents. At the request of counsel for the respondents, adjourned and put up on 4th July, 2013. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Birend...
Md Imroz Ashif Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1195 of 2013 Md. Imroz Ashif .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Dr. Hasnain Waris For the State: Mr. H.K. Shikarwar, APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Sanjay Kumar 3/18.06.2013: As prayed by learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2, put up this case in the next week. In the meantime, petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with Complaint Case No. 766 of 2012 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Ms Markaz Trading Through Its Proprietor Sarfaraz Ahmad and ors Vs. Co ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 3490 of 2013 M/s. Markaz Trading & Others ... Petitioners Versus Coal India Limited & others ... Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. A.K.Mehta, Advocate. ------ Order No. 02 Dated 18th June, 2013 Admit. List along with W.P.(T) Nos. 3087 of 2013, 3264 of 2013 and 3472 of 2013. Meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 7th May, 2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioners is hereby stayed. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Birendra/...
Gopinath Ghosh Vs. Home Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(PIL)No.1555of2013 GopinathGhosh .... .... .... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand&Ors. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.A.K.Agarwal,Advocate FortheRespondents : th OrderNo.03 Dated,18 June,2013 Learnedcounselforthepetitionersubmittedtheplight oftwoofthevictims,referenceofwhichhasbeengiveninthewrit petition at page nos. 7 & 9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of pointing out the plight of these two victims,noseriouseffortshavebeendonebytheStateauthoritiesto redressthegrievanceofthepoorgirls. Theissueraisedisofseriousnatureandtherefore,we directtheofficetoprepareandgiveacopyofthispetitiontothe Director, Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority, who shall immediatelyinstructtheChairman,DistrictLegalServicesAuthority of the area to look into the plight of the victim Lipi Purti D/o MangraPurtiresidentofKothaToli,Kodakol,MurahuandKongay Dodray D/o Mandura Dod...
Chandra Sekhar Banerjee and anr Vs. Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.1192 of 2013 Chandra Sekhar Banerjee & another .... Petitioners Versus M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner :Mr. Sailesh For the Respondents : Mr. Indrajit Sinha & Mr. Arpan Mishra I.A. No. 3585 o03. 18.06.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application, petitioner seeks to implead the Director General of Mines Safety(D.G.M.S.) as party respondent in the present writ application as according to him the respondent- BCCL has taken stand that the petitioner is not having the equipment of requisite specification to participate in the global tender notice based upon the circular issued by the D.G.M.S. It is the contention of the petitioner that construction of guidelines of D.G.M.S. has been flawed by B.C.C.L as it does not amount to debarring the petitioner from participating in the global tender. In that view of the matter, presence of D.G.M.S...
Ranjeet Kumar Mani Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1938 of 2012 Ranjeet Kumar Mani Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K Das, Advocate For the State : APP ----- I.A. No.2720 o02. 17.06.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this application had initially been filed for quashing of the order taking cognizance dated 21.11.2006 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Pakur, but subsequently by way of this interlocutory application being I.A. No.2720 of 2013, order dated 21.05.2012 has been challenged to be bad wherein bail bond of the petitioner has been rejected and warrant of arrest has been order to be issued and, therefore, prayer made in the interlocutory application be allowed to be incorporated in the main application. Prayer made in the aforesaid interlocutory application is, hereby, allowed. Let inter...
Soma Sinku Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 133 of 2013 Soma Sinku Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Mr. R.P. Gupta For the Respondent: Mr. K. Shankar, A.P.P. ------ 06/Dated: June, 17, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the judgment of the trial Court, this appeal is ADMITTED.2) Records and proceedings of Sessions Trial Case No. 217 of 2011 is called for from the trial Court (Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum, at Chaibasa) so as to reach this Court to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence on or before the next date of hearing.3) Matter is adjourned to be enlisted on 8th July, 2013.4) Registry is directed get the paper book prepared with neatly typed copies of depositions of prosecution witnesses and their evidences on record as required under Sections 190 and 191 of the ...
Sanjeev Arora and ors Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.3309 of 2013 Sanjeev Arora & others .... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner :Mr. Ayush Aditya For the Respondents : Mr. Sunil Singh, J.C. to S.C.II 02/17.06.2013 This writ petition is being disposed of today after hearing the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the respondent State, as no notices are required to be issued to other respondents since the petitioners do not pray for any relief against respondent nos. 5 to 8. According to the petitioners in the writ petition, they are some of the owners of the goods which are kept in the cold storage which are sealed by the respondent district administration pursuant to the order dated 7th August 2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Ranchi. It is contended on behalf of these petitioners that dispute is inter-se between BISCOMAUN (Respondent No.5) and the respond...
Arun Kumar Pandey Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3507 of 2011 Arun Kumar Pandey .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Kashyap For the State: Mr. T.N. Verma, APP 15/17.06.2013: It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already died. Thus, this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »