Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1452 of 2013 Ashok Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Prem Prakash, A.P.P. For the Informant : - Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate. 04/18.06.2013 Put up this case in the next week, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner. In the meantime, interim order dated 14.05.2013 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Maheshwar Kumar and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1351of2013 with A.B.A.No.1372of2013 1.AnjanBandopadhyay@AnjanBandyopadhyay....................Petitioner (inA.B.A.No.1351of2013) 1.MaheshwarKumar 2.KrishnaArjunPrasadSingh........Petitioners(inA.B.A.No.1372of2013) Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.BharatKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/18.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It reveals from the F.I.R. that after receiving instruction from the S.P., Dhanbad the premises of nonbanking company, running within the district, were inspected by the informant who happens to be a police officer. These petitioners relate to M/s Roofers Capital Management Ltd., Govindpur. It is allegedthatthecompanyhadbeenalluringthepeopletodoinvestmentand they would get higher rate of interest and in this manner they have been misleadingandcheatingthepeopleforthepurposeofraisingfund. ItissubmittedthatpetitionerAnjanBandopadhyayisManagingDirector...
Sagir Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1700 of 2013 Sagir Ansari ...... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. M.B. Lal For the State : Mrs Niki Sinha, A.P.P. ........ 3/18.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Sagir Ansari in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 109 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 1068 of 2013, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad is moved by Sri M.B. Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Mrs. Niki Sinha, learned Additional PP. for the State. It appears that petitioner is owner of Tata-407 bearing registration No. JH-02C-3351, from which 86 bags of Lafarge cement recovered. It is alleged that in the closed cement factory, accused persons were packing fake cement in the bags of different renowned cement company and selling them to different places. Truck of petitioner seized in front of aforesaid c...
Virendra Pratap Dubey Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance Bur ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1447 of 2013 Virendra Pratap Dubey .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance Bureau, Ranchi ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Jay Shankar Tiwary For the Vigilance: Mr. T.N. Verma, 5/18.06.2013: As prayed by learned counsel for the Vigilance Department, put up this case after one week. In the meantime, interim order dated 07.05.2013 will continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Smt. Lali Devi Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 321 of 2012 --- Smt. Lali Devi --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus Jharkhand State Electricity Board through its Chairman & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. N.K. Pasari, Advocate For the JSEB: Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate --- I.A. No. 3434/2013 06/ 18.06.2013 The petitioner has a concern since the electricity Bills for her premises are not being raised by the respondent Electricity Board. She carries apprehension that suddenly an inflated Bill would be raised along with the delayed payment surcharges. Counsel for the respondent Board however fairly submits that there is no reason why regular electricity Bills should not be raised in respect of the premises of the petitioner which has a electricity connection. In these circumstances, I.A. is being disposed of on the fair submission of the learned counsel appearing for the Board Mr. Ajit Kumar that the respondent would...
Sunil Kumar Verma and ors Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.3112 of 2013 with I.A. no.3348 o1. Sunil Kr.Verma 2.Neel Kusum Toppo 3.Veena Lakra 4.Rajesh Kr.Sahu 5.Brajesh Kr.Pandey 6.Kripa Shankar Pandey 7.Subhash Kumar 8.Binay Kr.Jha 9.Rajesh Krishna 10.Bipin Bihari Jha 11.Biswajeet Adhikari . Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioners : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C.III ----- 2/18.06.2013 In I.A. no.3348 of 2013, the petitioners have prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) NO.3112 of 2013 in terms of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(S) no.2194 of 2013{Ravindra Kumar Ojha & Ors. Vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.}. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that the case is exactly identical with the case, which has been decided in the aforesaid writ petition and the instant writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in the a...
Sonu Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Dharmendra Kumar Srivastava an ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 3264 of 2013 Sonu Enterprises & others. ... Petitioners Versus Coal India Limited & others ... Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate. For the Respondents : Md. Mokhtar Khan, ASGI. ------ Order No. 03 Dated 18th June, 2013 Admit. List along with W.P.(T) Nos. 3087 of 2013, 3472 of 2013 and 3490 of 2013. Meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 7th May, 2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioners is hereby stayed. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Birendra/...
Jalil Ansari Alias Md Jalil Alias Mian Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1326 of 2013 Jalil Ansari @ Md. Jalil @ Jalil Mian .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: None For the State: Mr.A.K. Pandey, APP 3/18.06.2013: No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. Interim order dated 17.04.2013 is hereby vacated. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned for taking all coercive steps against the petitioner. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Raj Kumar Vs. Parvati Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 199 of 2009 Raj Kumar ..........Appellant Vrs. Parvati Devi ...... Respondent ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. K.K. Singh, Adv. ------ Dated 18th June, 2013. Today in W.P.(Cr.) No.47 of 2013, the criminal proceedings initiated after lodging of FIR by the respondent- wife being Hathauri P.S. Case No. 27/2007, dated 2.7.2007 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera in the district of Samastipur (Bihar) has been quashed by a separate order. Learned counsel for the appellant handed over a demand draft of Rs. 4 lacs to learned counsel for the respondent-wife which has been accepted on behalf of respondent-wife and her daughter by the learned counsel for...
Ms Perfect Construction Hazaribagh Through Surendra Prasad Mehta Its P ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.3333 of 2013 M/s Perfect Construction, Hazaribag .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner :None For the Respondents : Mr. Saket Upadhayay, J.C. to A.A.G. I.A. No. 3574 o02. 18.06.2013 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant interlocutory application. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is dismissed as not pressed. W.P.(C). No.3333 of 2013 List this case under the heading for Admission. A. Mohanty (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »