Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Kumar Karmali Alias Sunil Karmali Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1625 of 2013 Sunil Kumar Karmali @ Sunil Karmali . ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : M/s P.K. Nayak, Rana Surjit Singh For the State : Mr. Tapas Roy, A.P.P. ........ 3/18.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Karmali @ Sunil Karmali is moved by Sri P.K. Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Tapas Roy, learned Additional PP. for the State. It appears from Annexure-2 that complainant has been apprehended by the police while she was living with one Firoj Ansari. Thereafter she went to her parental house. Annexure-4 reveals that she refused to reside with petitioner before Panchayat and said that if she will be compelled to live with petitioner, she will commit suicide. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the ...
Parwati Kumar Vs. Raj Kumar Mandal ? Raj Kumar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 183 of 2010 Parwati Kumari @ Parwati Devi ..........Appellant Vrs. Raj Kumar ...... Respondent ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant: Mr. K.K. Singh, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Adv. ------ Dated 18th June, 2013. This appeal is dismissed having become infructuous in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir...
Dinesh Prasad Keshri and ors Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.3085 of 2013 with I.A. no.3493 o1. Dinesh Prasad Keshri 2.Maqsood Zafar Hadi 3.Afsarul Abdin 4.Qamar Zia 5.Tufail Ahmad 6.Dinesh Kumar Sahu 7.Md.Iqbal Ahmad 8.Md.Mohibullah 9.Sunil Kumar 10.Ashok Kumar Sinha 11.Praveen Kumar Gupta . Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioners : Mr. Amit Kr.Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C.III ----- 2/18.06.2013 In I.A. no.3493 of 2013, the petitioners have prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) NO.3085 of 2013 in terms of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(S) no.2194 of 2013{Ravindra Kumar Ojha & Ors. Vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.}. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that the case is exactly identical with the case, which has been decided in the aforesaid writ petition and the instant writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in the afo...
Bihar State Industrial Develop Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(PIL)No.6507of2010 BiharStateIndustrialDevelopmentCorporationLtd. KaramchariMahasangh,Ranchi ... ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Others ... ... ...Respondents With W.P.(C)No.2597of2012 BiharStateIndustrialDevelopmentCorporationLtd.,Ranchi ... ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Others ... ... ...Respondents With W.P.(C)No.2619of2012 BiharStateIndustrialDevelopmentCorporationLtd.,Ranchi ... ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Others ... ... ... Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.HimahshuKumarMehta,Advocate Ms.ManjusriPatra,Advocate Mr.P.Mishra,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.AjitKumar,A.A.G. Mr.S.P.Roy,Advocate th OrderNo.22 Dated,18 June,2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. We are impressed with the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents have not taken serious steps for disposing of their property because they took abouttwomonthstimeinrein...
Raj Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 47 of 2013 Raj Kumar and others ..........Petitioners Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Nivas Roy, G.P.III Mr. S.P. Roy, Adv.(State of Bihar) Mr. K.K. Singh,Adv.(for private respondent) ------ Reportable Dated 18th June, 2013. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying that F.I.R. pertaining to Hathauri P.S. Case No. 27/2007, dated 2.7.2007 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, which is now pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera in the district of Samastipur (Bihar) may be quashed.3. Office has raised objection with respect to territori...
Suman Devi Vs. Nikesh Kumar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 158 of 2012 Suman Devi ... Appellant Versus Nikesh Kumar ... Respondent ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate. For the Respondent : ----- ------ Order No. 04 Dated 18th June, 2013 Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that appeal yet has not been admitted and even notice has not been issued. In view of the above, office should not have listed the matter 'for orders' merely because I.A. has been filed as the same could have been considered at the time of consideration for admission. List the matter 'for admission' on 2nd July, 2013. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Birendra/...
Ms Shree Balaji Enterprises Through Its Authorized Signatory Ramesh Ku ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.194 of 2013 M/s Shree Balaji Enterprises .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner :M/s A.K.Mehta, Amit Kr. Sinha, Kaushal Agarwal & Mr. Ananda Sen For the Respondents : M/s Ajit Kumar, AAG & Saket Upadhayay, J.C. to AAG I.A. No. 3330 o06. 18.06.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application, petitioner seeks an interim protection as the respondents are proceeding in a certificate case being Case No. 26(MR)2012-13 for the realization of amount of about Rs. 33 crores on account of alleged illegal mining by the petitioner for certain period before expiry of his lease on 1st July, 2012. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of Revisional authority in the main writ application whereby his application for issuance of Form 'D' for valid transportation of minerals in question were rejected and certain actions were also directed to...
Om Prakash Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1607 of 2013 Om Prakash Sinha Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Tapas Roy, A.P.P. For the O.P. NO.2 : - Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Advocate. 03/18.06.2013 Put up this case after two weeks, as prayed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. In the meantime, interim order dated 16.05.2013 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Budhu Lohra and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1373 of 2013 Budhu Lohra & Others Petitioners -V e r s u s- State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. Ranjeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : - Mrs. Niki Sinha, A.P.P. 05/18.06.2013 Put up this case after one week, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioners. In the meantime, interim order dated 14.05.2013 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Ravindra Sharma Alias Ravindra Kumar Sharma and ors Vs. State of Jhark ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1404of2013 1.RavindraSharma@RavindraKumarSharma 2.ManojSharma@ManojKumarSharma 3.UrmilaDevi Petitioners Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.SumanSharma OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.R.S.Mazumdar,Sr.Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 06/18.06.2013 PetitionersaredirectedtomakecomplainantasO.P.No.2. IssuenoticetonewlyaddedO.P.No.2throughregisteredcoverwithA.D. aswellasthroughordinaryprocessforwhichrequisitesetc.mustbefiledwithin oneweek. In the mean time, above named petitioners shall not be arrested in connectionwithAdityapurP.S.CaseNo.279of2012,correspondingtoG.R.Case No.972 of 2012, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »