Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suman Devi Vs. Nikesh Kumar

Suman Devi vs Nikesh Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 18, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972629

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suman Devi

Respondent

Nikesh Kumar

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi f.a. no. 158 of 2012 suman devi ... appellant versus nikesh kumar ... respondent ------- coram: hon'ble the chief justice hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy ------ for the appellant : mr. pratiush lala, advocate. for the respondent : ----- ------ order no. 04 dated 18th june, 2013 learned counsel for the appellant submitted that appeal yet has not been admitted and even notice has not been issued. in view of the above, office should not have listed the matter 'for orders' merely because i.a. has been filed as the same could have been considered at the time of consideration for admission. list the matter 'for admission' on 2nd july, 2013. (prakash tatia, c.j.) (jaya roy, j.) birendra/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 158 of 2012 Suman Devi ... Appellant Versus Nikesh Kumar ... Respondent ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate. For the Respondent : ----- ------ Order No. 04 Dated 18th June, 2013 Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that appeal yet has not been admitted and even notice has not been issued. In view of the above, office should not have listed the matter 'for orders' merely because I.A. has been filed as the same could have been considered at the time of consideration for admission. List the matter 'for admission' on 2nd July, 2013. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Birendra/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial