Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukesh D Ambani Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1238 of 2013 Mukesh D. Ambani @ Mukesh Ambani, Chairman & Managing Director, Reliance Industries Limited . Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Agriculture Produce Market Committee through its Secretary at Pandra, Ranchi Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate & Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, Rajesh Kr. Singh & Mohan Kr. Dubey, Advocates For the State : Mr. S.S. Sahay, APP For the A.P.M.C. : Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate & Mrinal Kanti Roy, Adv. ----- 03/19.06.2013: This application has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of Complaint Case not C-III-63 of 2013 including the order dated 22.02.2013 whereby and whereunder, learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ranchi has taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 48 of the Jharkhand Agriculture Produce Market Act, 2000, against the petitioner and others. The case of the...
Lalan Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.(C)CaseNo.64of2010 LalanKumarSharmaVs.TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. CORAM: HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant/Petitioner:Mr.S.Sourabh FortheOpp.PartyState:JCtoSr.S.CII FortheOpp.PartyUOI:Mr.M.Khan ForOpp.PartyPollutionBoard:Mr.A.K.Pandey FortheOpp.PartyRMC:Mr.R.R.Nath OrderNo.10 Dated19 th June,2013 This contempt petition has been preferred because of non implementation of certain directions contained in the order dated 22ndJuly,2003passedinW.P(PIL)No.3585/2002andithasbeen broughttoournoticebythelearnedcounselforthepetitionerthat someordersmaybelookedintobecauseofthereasonthatitisa matter of public interest, for which PIL was entertained by the DivisionBenchofthisHighCourtasbackasintheyear2002and severalorderswerepassedsince2002inW.P(PIL)No.3585/2002. ThesaidPILhasbeendisposedof,videorderdated28thApril,2008, afterrecordingthestatementofthethenlearnedAdvocateGeneral, whosubmittedthatalreadyelectedbodyhas taken the charge ...
Kishore Ram and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2077 o1. Kishore Ram 2. Heman Mahto ... ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. Arwind Kumar For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ........ 2/19.06.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. This anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Nand Kishor Prasad Vs. Bank of Baroda Through Its Branch Manager and o ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
Therefore,norelief, asprayedfor,canbegrantedinthiswrit petition,whichis,accordingly,dismissed. (ApareshKumarSingh,J.) Pandey INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(C)No.505of2013 NandKishorPrasad ... Petitioner Versus BankofBarodaandors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.A.K.Sahani FortheRespondents :Mr.xx 219.6.2013 Thiswritpetitionisdirectedagainstthenoticedated2.11.2012 issuedbytherespondentno.2inexerciseofpowerunderSection13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and EnforcementofSecuritiesAct,2002(inshortSARFAESIAct,2002). Duringcourseofargument,itappearsthatthiswritpetitionwas preferredbythepetitionerastheappellateforumundertheSARFAESI Acti.e.theDebtRecoveryTribunal,Ranchi, wasnotavailableasthe postofPresidingOfficerwasvacant.However,learnedcounselforthe petitionernowinformsthattheTribunalisfullyfunctionalwithregular incumbentonthepostofPresidingOfficer.However,hesubmitsthat onaccountofpendencyoftheinstantwrit...
Shatrunjay Tripathy Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2139 of 2013 Shatrunjay Tripathy ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : M/s Rajiv Ranjan, Vishal Kumar Trivedi For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ........ 2/19.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Shatrunjay Tripathy is moved by Sri Rajiv Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned Additional PP. for the State. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that from the allegations made in the first information report, no offence under Sections 384 & 353 of the Indian Penal Code are made out. Other offences are bailable. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 29th of June 2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is direc...
Indian Iron and Steel Co Ltd Through Its General Manager C J T Jayanta ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 2495 of 2013 Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ... Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Poddar, Advocate. For the Respondent : J.C. to A.A.G. ------ Order No. 07 Dated 18th June, 2013 Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he is filing counter affidavit today. In view of the above, the matter is adjourned and if the petitioner wants to file the rejoinder to the counter affidavit, he may file the same. Put up in the 2nd week of July, 2013. In case appeal in question has not been dismissed by the Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Appeals), Dhanbad Division, Dhanbad, the same shall not be dismissed till next date. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Birendra/...
Smt Sushila Sah Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1419 of 2013 Smt. Sushila Sah .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Brij Bihari Sinha For the State: Mr. Tapas Roy, APP 2/18.06.2013: This application has been filed for modification of order dated 09.05.2013 passed in ABA No. 1463 of 2013. It is submitted that by the aforesaid order, petitioner was granted anticipatory bail and was directed to surrender in the court below by 24.05.2013, but due to illness, petitioner could not surrender within the time stipulated. Accordingly, it is prayed that the order dated 09.05.2013 be modified by extending the date of surrender. Learned Additional P.P. has no objection. In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned in this application, the same is allowed and the order dated 09.05.2013 passed in ABA No. 1463 of 2013 is modified and date of surrender is extended by 01.07.2013. ( Prashant...
Jawahar Lal Gupta Alias Jawahar Gupto and anr Vs. the State of Jharkha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1402of2013 1.JawaharlalGupta@JawaharGupta 2.RahulGupta Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.MaheshTewari,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/18.06.2013 CallforthexeroxcopyofthecasediaryfromtheCourtconcerned. CommunicatethisorderthroughFAXatthecostofpetitioner. Listthiscaseon01.07.2013. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Khunti Jila Anganbari Karamchari Shabha Vs. Welfare
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(C)No.3566of2012 KhuntiJilaAnganbariKaramchariShabha... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.S.K.Deo FortheRespondents :JCtoGPIV 518 6.2013 The petitioner herein claims to be the representative of the AnganwariSevikaoftheDistrictofKhunti,whohasraisedagrievance regardingpaymentofarrearsofbillundertheheadof purchaseof nutrients for the month of January, February and March for the financialyear201011andapproachedthisCourtforadirectionupon therespondentstomakepaymentforthesame. Anaffidavithasbeenfiledonbehalfoftherespondentnos.2and 3 being the Secretary and the Director, Department of Women and ChildDevelopment,GovernmentofJharkhand.Sumandsubstanceof theaffidavitfiledontheirbehalfisthatcertainfundsweresurrendered bytheDeputyCommissioner,Khuntiinrespectofthesaidprogramme forthedistrictofKhuntiinthefinancialyear201011.However,again demands were raised under the same p...
Krishna Chandra Hembrom Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.7579of2011 KrishnaChandraHembrom .... .... .... Petitioner Versus UnionofIndia&Ors. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.KaushalendraPrasad,Advocate FortheRespondents : th OrderNo.07 Dated,18 June,2013 Ithasbeenpointedoutthatthenameofthecounselfor thepetitionerhaswronglybeenmentionedintheorderdated2nd May,2013. Thecorrectionismadeintheoriginalordertodayinthe Court. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »