Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bana Bablu Banra and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B) No. 176 o1. Bana Bablu Banra 2. Pradip Tanty ... Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Respondent ------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ------- For the Appellants : Mr. Kaustav Panda, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P ------ 04/DATED 1 June, 2013 th Per D.N. Patel, J.1. This appeal has been admitted vide order dated 9th May, 2013.2. Records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 116 of 2010 was called for from the Trial Court so as to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence.3. This Court has received the records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 116 of 2010 and we have perused the same.4. We have heard the counsel for both the sides, at length.5. Having heard the counsel for both the sides and looking to the evidences on record, it appears that the prosecution has examined total eight witnesses. P.Ws. 1, 2, and 3 have turned hostile....
Md Shadab HussaIn Alias Sahadeb HussIn Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI B. A. No. 3195 of 2013 Md. Shadab Hussain @ Sahadeb Hussain @ Shadeb Hussain ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Chakraverty For the State : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, A.P.P. ........ 4/19.06.2013 Bail application filed by petitioner Md. Shadab Hussain @ Sahadeb Hussain @ Shadeb Hussain in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No. 2 of 2010 (S.T. No. 370 of 2010), pending in the court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur is moved by Sri D.K. Chakraverty, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Kaushal Kishor Mishra, learned Additional PP. for the State. Earlier on two occasions, bail prayer of petitioner rejected after considering the merit of case. Thus, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner above named on bail. Accordingly, his bail application rejected. However, it appears that petitioner is in custody from 16.0...
Pallav Roy Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.136 of 2012 Pallav Roy .......................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ...Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. Tapash Kabiraj For the State : A.P.P 6.19.6.13. I.A.No.3553 of 2013 An interlocutory application bearing no.3553 of 2013 has been filed wherein prayer has been made to make necessary correction in the last part of the order dated 27.2.2013 wherein complaint case no.01 of 2008 has been recorded instead of L.E.O case no.01 of 2008. In view of the prayer made in the interlocutory application, 'complaint case no.01 of 2008' as recorded under order dated 27.2.2013 be read as 'L.E.O case no.01 of 2008'. Accordingly, the order dated 27.2.2013 is modified to the extent indicated above. The aforesaid I.A stands disposed of. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Md Shahid Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1522of2013 Md.ShahidAnsari Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.JaiShankarTripathi,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/19.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Petitioner is accused in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.33 of 2013correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.92of2013,pendingintheCourtoflearned S.D.J.M.,Madhupur. It reveals from the written report that the truck belonging to the petitionerwasfoundcarryingcoalwithoutpaper.Thedriverandcleaner,who werearrested,failedtofurnishanydocumenteitherwithregardtoownershipof thevehicleorofthecoalbeingtransported. Itissubmittedthatdriverandcleaner,whowerearrestedatthespothave beengrantedregularbailbytheCourtoflearnedSessionsJudge.Thecoalwas transportedonthetruckonthebasisofvaliddocumentwhichotheraccused haveproducedbeforetheCourtbelow. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Since the truck belonging to the petitioner...
Upendra Prasad Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ----- W.P. (P.I.L.) No. 7583 of 2011 Upendra Prasad Singh .... .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... .... .... Respondents ----- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. P.C. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. R. Shankar, G.A. th OrderNo.10 Dated,19 June,2013 After hearing at length, we are of the considered opinionthatitwillbeappropriatetodirecttheStateGovernmentto instruct Deputy Commissioner, Giridih under whose area, the schemeofIndiraAwasYojnaisbeingimplementedsothattheymay lookintothematterthatinfacthousesareconstructedunderIndira AwasYojnaforthebeneficiariesandtheymayseethatthereshould not be any middle man between the beneficiaries and the Governmentagenciesmakingpaymenttothebeneficiariesandthe DeputyCommissionermaygivetheirreportofactualconstruction ofthehousesaswellasallthecomplaints,whichhasbeenraisedin hisarea. Thisfreshstatusreportmaybesubmittedinviewofth...
Pawal Khalkho and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1729 o1. Pawal Khalkho 2. Semon Khalkho .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. J.J.Sanga For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.06.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioners in connection with Ratu PS case No. 44 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 143,341,323,379,504 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals that some altercation took place between the informant and the petitioners on account of construction of road. It is alleged that these petitioners have also taken away Rs. 3000/- from the informant in course of scuffle. It is submitted that the allegation of theft is super added to make the offence non bailable. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering facts and circumstances of the case as...
Sabujbala Devya (Sabuj Devi) Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 6123 of 2011 Sabujbala Devya (Sabuj Devi) ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Pravir Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, AAG ---- I.A. No. 2582/2013 04/19-06-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has payed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.(S) No. 6123 of 2011 under the heading For Admission. It has been submitted that the petitioner is a lady and she has filed this writ petition for employment under Land Loser Scheme since the entire land belonging to the petitioner has been acquired by the respondents. Learned AAG, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection in fixing an early date of hearing of the writ petition. Considering that the petitioner is a lady and other facts and circumstance, this I.A. is allowed. Office is directed to list W.P.S. No. 6123 of 2011 under the heading "For Admiss...
Samir Chandra Gorai Alias Samir Chand Gorai and anr Vs. the State of J ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1672 o1. Samir Chandra Gorai @ Samir Chand Gorai 2. Anup Das .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmad For the State: Mr. Tapas Roy, APP 4/19.06.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Sushil Singh and Another Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1401 o1. Sushil Singh 2. Ramesh Chandra @ Ramesh Chandra Konshal.Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another .............. Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. Ananda Sen 3/ 19.6.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the parties got their dispute resolved and have also filed a compromise petition, he may be permitted to withdraw this application. In view of the submission, let this application be dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Bhagwan Lal and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2116 o1. Bhagwan Lal 2. Kunti Devi 3. Rajan @ Rajan Sharma @ Rajan Shahani 4. Sunita Devi 5. Sangita Devi @ Sangita Kumari .. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. Naresh Pd. Thakur For the State : Mr. Hardeo Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ........ 2/19.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Bhagwan Lal, Kunti Devi, Rajan @ Rajan Sharma @ Rajan Shahani, Sunita Devi and Sangita Devi @ Sangita Kumari is moved by Sri Naresh Pd. Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri Hardeo Pd. Singh, learned Additional PP. for the State. This is a case under Sections 498A/323/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law and sisters-in-law of informant. There is general and vague allegation against these petitioners. No specific ov...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »