Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pallav Roy Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Pallav Roy vs State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 19, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972439

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pallav Roy

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p.no.136 of 2012 pallav roy .......................................petitioner versus state of jharkhand and another ...opposite parties coram: honble mr. justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner : mr. tapash kabiraj for the state : a.p.p 6.19.6.13. i.a.no.3553 of 2013 an interlocutory application bearing no.3553 of 2013 has been filed wherein prayer has been made to make necessary correction in the last part of the order dated 27.2.2013 wherein complaint case no.01 of 2008 has been recorded instead of l.e.o case no.01 of 2008. in view of the prayer made in the interlocutory application, 'complaint case no.01 of 2008' as recorded under order dated 27.2.2013 be read as 'l.e.o case no.01 of 2008'. accordingly, the order dated 27.2.2013 is modified to the extent indicated above. the aforesaid i.a stands disposed of. let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioner. ( r.r. prasad, j.) nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.136 of 2012 Pallav Roy .......................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ...Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. Tapash Kabiraj For the State : A.P.P 6.19.6.13. I.A.No.3553 of 2013 An interlocutory application bearing no.3553 of 2013 has been filed wherein prayer has been made to make necessary correction in the last part of the order dated 27.2.2013 wherein complaint case no.01 of 2008 has been recorded instead of L.E.O case no.01 of 2008. In view of the prayer made in the interlocutory application, 'complaint case no.01 of 2008' as recorded under order dated 27.2.2013 be read as 'L.E.O case no.01 of 2008'. Accordingly, the order dated 27.2.2013 is modified to the extent indicated above. The aforesaid I.A stands disposed of. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial